Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Accidents and Close Calls
Reload this Page >

Alaska Airlines 737-900 MAX loses a door in-flight out of PDX

Wikiposts
Search
Accidents and Close Calls Discussion on accidents, close calls, and other unplanned aviation events, so we can learn from them, and be better pilots ourselves.

Alaska Airlines 737-900 MAX loses a door in-flight out of PDX

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 6th Jan 2024, 16:16
  #101 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: 75' from the runway edge and 150' from the threshold
Age: 74
Posts: 247
Received 30 Likes on 12 Posts
Originally Posted by Fright Level
I often read comms transcripts from US events and there seems a reluctance to use ICAO standard phraseology. "We are an emergency" doesn't have the gravitas of a mayday call which I thought was what it should have been.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-67899564
Originally Posted by Matt2725
From the audio I heard, even after the pilot declared they were an emergency, the next controller on approached asked again if they were an emergency aircraft (not sure why this wasn't passed on. I can only assume the Alaska wasn't squawking 7700 for some reason). The pilot reponsed in the affirmative, and gave the souls and fuel onboard. Yet soon after, ATC asked for souls and fuel onboard, which required the same readback again.

Not sure what we going on with the controllers, but the communication seemed pretty poor throughout.
Flight Level, Matt2725, please see my post no. 78. Not only does it give every one notice that you're in a baaaad way but your clearances can be sorted very quickly, nearby airfields will be wanting to offer you runways and the tower controler will press the big button on the red phone in the tower to scramble the crash crew. If I remember correctly captain Sullenberger didn't "I want to declare an emergency" He used "Mayday, mayday, mayday Cactus xxx double birdstrike (or similar) See this as an example:
ACW342 is offline  
Old 6th Jan 2024, 16:17
  #102 (permalink)  
JG1
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: on root
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Auxtank
Except for;

Hard to believe an aircraft equipped with this pinball game technology had just been built and delivered. There's a lot wrong in this industry.
JG1 is offline  
Old 6th Jan 2024, 16:22
  #103 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Beyond the Blue Horizon
Age: 63
Posts: 1,257
Received 153 Likes on 96 Posts
Well this just enforces my view re 737 Max and indeed makes me question my whole view of Boing as a company. I spent most of my working career on their products, but now actively avoid their products. I dont like the 787 and avoid 737 Max for pretty obvious reasons, though I was on a LH 747 up from Singapore at the end of last year, and she was fine and felt at ease. The new Boeings are a shadow of their predecessor's. To put in context I fly probably 2-3 times a week long and short haul over the year. If I am thinking like this and I am only humble SLF, how many others are taking this view re Boeings new products ? Get the company base back to Seattle, kick the accountant's back to where they belong, and let engineers design things. Accountancy is a support function in a business, not the defining thing unless you are an accountancy practice. There will be books written in the future about the demise of this business !!

Rant over
Cheers
Mr Mac
Mr Mac is offline  
Old 6th Jan 2024, 16:28
  #104 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Canada
Age: 63
Posts: 5,208
Received 133 Likes on 60 Posts
Originally Posted by JG1
Hard to believe an aircraft equipped with this pinball game technology had just been built and delivered. There's a lot wrong in this industry.
That sir is an insult to pinball machines everywhere!

Too bad Boeing thinks “QA” stands for Quality Avoidance,…..
Big Pistons Forever is offline  
Old 6th Jan 2024, 16:31
  #105 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 75
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I remember a HS 748 crashing near East Midlands in the UK that lost a door and it wrapped itself round the leading edge of the tailplane.
Control lost and straight down. The swept tail of a 737 may prevent the door from staying put but I would not bank on it.
canard68 is offline  
Old 6th Jan 2024, 16:43
  #106 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: us
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
All things considered, Boeing had a very lucky day. Had this happened on a flight halfway to PHNL at FL390, Boeing would no longer be in the commercial aircraft business.
runner1021 is offline  
Old 6th Jan 2024, 16:58
  #107 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: London
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Matt2725
From the audio I heard, even after the pilot declared they were an emergency, the next controller on approached asked again if they were an emergency aircraft (not sure why this wasn't passed on. I can only assume the Alaska wasn't squawking 7700 for some reason). The pilot reponsed in the affirmative, and gave the souls and fuel onboard. Yet soon after, ATC asked for souls and fuel onboard, which required the same readback again.

Not sure what we going on with the controllers, but the communication seemed pretty poor throughout.
Exactly my first thought when I heard the ATC comms.

Declaring mayday is an unambiguous, worldwide recognised statement that gets everyone’s attention.

The Thomson incident from the early 2000’s that someone posted here is a clear example of how to communicate.

Friend of mine recently had to call the coastguard on the telephone as his boat was on fire and he couldn’t get to the VHF. Even on the phone, he went through the mayday sequence because it told the coastguard two important things:

1- All the relevant info
2- The person on the phone knows what they are talking about.
Voodoo78 is offline  
Old 6th Jan 2024, 17:01
  #108 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: UK
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by JG1
Hard to believe an aircraft equipped with this pinball game technology had just been built and delivered. There's a lot wrong in this industry.
You would probably be surprised how many parts on a 737 have identification starting "707"......
Thruster763 is offline  
Old 6th Jan 2024, 17:02
  #109 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
VAS aviation video summary with ATC comms



MLHeliwrench is offline  
Old 6th Jan 2024, 17:06
  #110 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Timbuktu
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by MechEngr
Amazingly the nearby tray table remained in place.
And the safety card in the pocket in front. Better attached than that door.

Originally Posted by runner1021
All things considered, Boeing had a very lucky day. Had this happened on a flight halfway to PHNL at FL390, Boeing would no longer be in the commercial aircraft business.
They had 2 no-survivor crashes in a row of the same type, and are still in business.
brak is offline  
Old 6th Jan 2024, 17:09
  #111 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Ankh Morpork, DW
Posts: 652
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Auxtank
Good question. They should also have had a Master Caution with DOORS on the right hand annunciator panel as well but as you say; if the thing had taken it's hardware with it then possibly no.
The lights are marked INOP and are not wired to the "doors". The lights will test, but don't function as a warning.
ImbracableCrunk is offline  
Old 6th Jan 2024, 17:12
  #112 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Hawarden (near EGNR)
Age: 74
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is it me, or have most window incidents been on the Left Hand side?
Even the BAC 1-11 incident was on the LH side, albeit the Captain's windscreen.
Ancient-Mariner is offline  
Old 6th Jan 2024, 17:12
  #113 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

FAA orders grounding of 171 Boeing planes


https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-67903655
AirScotia is offline  
Old 6th Jan 2024, 17:14
  #114 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: inv
Posts: 349
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 2 Posts
Grounded in the US by the FAA

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-67903655
scr1 is offline  
Old 6th Jan 2024, 17:22
  #115 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: switzerland
Posts: 48
Received 6 Likes on 3 Posts
To be accurate it is a no-fly until completion of an inspection that takes 4 to 8 hrs:



IB
Ivor_Bigunn is offline  
Old 6th Jan 2024, 17:39
  #116 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Sudbury, Suffolk
Posts: 256
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Ivor_Bigunn
To be accurate it is a no-fly until completion of an inspection that takes 4 to 8 hrs:
IB
This implies to me that a specific issue has been identified as THE cause of this event.

Which, without the door present is remarkable and points to some gross failure of assembly
Maninthebar is offline  
Old 6th Jan 2024, 17:40
  #117 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Syd
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 2 Posts
Why do I feel uncomfortable everytime I hear an airline crew from the US demonstrating a complete lack of RT awareness?

As for Boeing, its not a good look.

Along with the issues over 777x certification, the issues with the 767 tanker, the issues with the 787, the issues with the Max (tail bolts), the issues with the Max (bulkhead), the issues with the Max (MCAS).

In fact, one could argue the aerospace industry in the US has taken its eye off the ball.

V-22, F-22, F-35.......

The realities of a bean counters financialised economy.

Orange future is offline  
Old 6th Jan 2024, 17:41
  #118 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Hawarden (near EGNR)
Age: 74
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by MechEngr
I suspect the 200 mph gust might have had some influence, however short a time that was. For a moment the child likely resembled the car lot inflatables with their arms flailing in the air.

So, someone on the ground gets: A door. An inner panel. A chilhttps://theaircurrent.com/feed/dispa...zation-issues/d's shirt. A seat cover. And, per the BBC, a cellular phone.

Amazingly the nearby tray table remained in place.

I picture a rural location where someone, looking up into a tree, says "Bob? What the hell did you get up to last night?"
I wonder if that cellular phone rings out if called? Would give a rough location of the "door" maybe?

Ancient-Mariner is offline  
Old 6th Jan 2024, 17:44
  #119 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2024
Location: TOKYO
Age: 28
Posts: 25
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I can't imagine an airline using the Boeing MAX brand to sell a ticket to their customers.
"Take a ride with use on our brand new A350s! Luxuries mile high!"
or
"Take a ride with us on our brand new Boeing 737 MAX'S! This airline cares more about money than your safety".
JapanHanuma is offline  
Old 6th Jan 2024, 17:47
  #120 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Brussels
Age: 56
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And now all Max's in the US. How these bricks are still allowed to fly is beyond me. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/01/05/b...4e81acd2ee83fc
Quantz is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.