PPRuNe Forums


Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11th Mar 2017, 13:25   #181 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Moscow region
Age: 58
Posts: 281
JTO,

Indeed, you are right about "shifting the focus". Though this NK ugly shorty would unlikely threaten the US territory, Japan and South Korea are under threat.

But is it really difficult to make VX on a country level? I am not an expert in chemistry, but using a common sense: it was developed in mid 50's in UK by the guys working for agriculture to fight weeds :-) No serious MoD investment, no huge plants in their possession. There was even an open GB patent with all the formulas, reaction chain description, etc. Might be impossible to make for jihadists hiding in the holes, but not for a militarized economy of the 25 mln country.

IMHO, helas, it is only China that can change all that (the NK regime), in a "couple of clicks". But they obviously do not want to: no need for them to scare their long-term rival (Japan) themselves. Let Kim do that.
A_Van is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th Mar 2017, 14:01   #182 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 4,747
I think China has a number of reservations about regime -change

1. They are not sure it can be done peaceably and they don't want a couple of million refugees flooding in

2. They sure as hell don't want a united (western) Korea across the border

3. They have strong prejudice about people interfering in other people's countrries
Heathrow Harry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th Mar 2017, 11:35   #183 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Under a recently defunct flight path.
Age: 70
Posts: 739
US to deploy missile-capable drones across border from North Korea

Article in the Guardian

Quote:
Deployment of Grey Eagle drones, designed to carry Hellfire missiles, in the South represents significant build-up of US military muscle.
Lyneham Lad is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 14th Mar 2017, 19:41   #184 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: birmingham
Posts: 24
I don't know much about NK but the Guardian comments pages sure are filled with loony tunes who just hate the US with a capital H. NK ? All the US's fault, NK threaten all their neighbors? The US's fault. In fact everything anywhere in the world is apparently the fault of the US. Have they always been like this ? Really odd people.
westernhero is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th Mar 2017, 19:57   #185 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 3,368
Some piccies of the PLAAF.

http://http://news.xinhuanet.com/eng..._135926878.htm
Fareastdriver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th Mar 2017, 06:43   #186 (permalink)
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Brighton
Age: 63
Posts: 8,278
Don't waste time, do they?

Warning that Beijing's military bases in South China Sea are ready for use

https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...hina-sea-ready
ORAC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th Apr 2017, 14:52   #187 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Under a recently defunct flight path.
Age: 70
Posts: 739
Chinese patrol ships keep presence around Malaysian reefs

Article in today's Guardian:-
Extract -
Quote:
Chinese coastguard vessels maintain a near-constant presence around reefs claimed by Malaysia in the South China Sea, ship-tracking data shared with the Guardian has revealed.

The findings show the extent of Beijing’s military ambitions far south of its borders, antagonising south-east Asian countries and deepening a potentially explosive foreign policy crisis with the US president, Donald Trump.

During the first two months of 2017, three Chinese ships patrolled the Luconia Shoals, an area of islets and reefs that are more than 1,000 miles (1,600km) from mainland China and only about 90 miles (145 km) north of Malaysian Borneo.
Something else to be discussed at Mar-a-Lago...
Lyneham Lad is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10th May 2017, 19:25   #188 (permalink)
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Brighton
Age: 63
Posts: 8,278
Satellite images reveal Chinese expansion in South China Sea
ORAC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th May 2017, 20:31   #189 (permalink)
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Brighton
Age: 63
Posts: 8,278
Satellite image shows Chinese deployment of new aircraft to South China Sea
ORAC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th May 2017, 07:37   #190 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 4,747
Well it makes sense to put your AEW assets closer to where they might be needed I'd have thought............
Heathrow Harry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th May 2017, 10:31   #191 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 492
I'd say "the west" should react by, step by step, putting own assets into the area as well. P-8, base agreements, naval patrols, new permanent stuff. Make them pay a price for any tiny bit. They move - we move. THAAD was quite right.
Kerosene Kraut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th May 2017, 13:55   #192 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 4,747
Trouble is not everyone in the area is that keen on risking a fight with China. the West (ok the USA) has to have agreements and treaties in place to build a permanent presence. The locals will want cast-iron guarantees that we'll back them if it all goes pear-shaped
Heathrow Harry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th May 2017, 15:03   #193 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Off San Diego surfing, watching for sharks
Posts: 3,099
Who's the we in "we'll"?
West Coast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th May 2017, 15:52   #194 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 4,747
well of course I mean the generic "we" as the free thinking liberal people of the West...

But if it comes to Military action it actually means YOU as in the YOUSA - and maybe with whoever's arms you can twist on any specific issue...........

The rest of us will back them but only as far as a UN Resolution - God forbid military action - which is why the SE Asians are a bit worried about upsetting China
Heathrow Harry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th May 2017, 16:08   #195 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Darkest Surrey
Posts: 4,757
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kerosene Kraut View Post
I'd say "the west" should react by, step by step, putting own assets into the area as well. P-8, base agreements, naval patrols, new permanent stuff. Make them pay a price for any tiny bit. They move - we move. THAAD was quite right.
So US wouldn't be that concerned if Cuba and China got friendly and China started moving missiles etc in ?

Some people want to go looking for a War all the time.

China hasn't attacked anybody yet everybody seemingly want to surround them with missiles and then claim it is China being belligerent.
racedo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th May 2017, 16:13   #196 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Darkest Surrey
Posts: 4,757
Quote:
Originally Posted by Heathrow Harry View Post
well of course I mean the generic "we" as the free thinking liberal people of the West...
This Free thinking liberal bit I struggle with ................................... I believe in Dmocracy and Capitalism but struggle to find much of that in the west.

People with the most money can buy the Government they want in the west and then use that Govt in pursuit of their own goals.

Just exactly what is the purpose of the West ?

Millions of people living in poverty, no income yet "the leaders" instead of looking after their own population are rushing to start a war somewhere else.

It then becomes a rinse and repeat continuously even though it doesn't work.
racedo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th May 2017, 06:01   #197 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Next door.
Posts: 573
http://http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/05/19/us-blasts-china-unprofessional-intercept-military-plane-fighter/ Looks like someone's been watching Top Gun again...or they wanted pics of antennas on the top?
Stitchbitch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th May 2017, 09:02   #198 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Japan
Posts: 264
Chinese 'coastguard' ships flying drones over the Senkaku Islands?


https://www3.nhk.or.jp/nhkworld/en/news/20170519_17/


Japan's Defense Minister Tomomi Inada has revealed that Self-Defense Force aircraft were scrambled when a drone was spotted near a Chinese ship in Japanese waters.

Inada told reporters on Friday that 2 F-15 fighters and an AWACS surveillance plane were dispatched after the sighting by the Coast Guard the previous day.

The drone was flying near one of 4 Chinese patrol ships that entered Japan's territorial waters near the Senkaku Islands in the East China Sea.

Inada said the drone was operated by Chinese vessels that intruded into Japanese waters and this was a serious infringement of Japan's sovereignty.

The Foreign Ministry lodged a protest with China on Thursday, saying the conduct could escalate tensions.

Japan controls the islands. The Japanese government maintains the islands are an inherent part of Japan's territory. China and Taiwan claim them.
jolihokistix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th May 2017, 10:48   #199 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: No longer a hot and sandy place....but back to the UK for an indefinite period
Posts: 170
Al Jazeera news are reporting that a USAF surveillance aircraft has been buzzed within fifty metres, by a couple of Chinese interceptors.
A note for Top Gun fans....for a period, one interceptor flew inverted over the top of the USAF plane.
Boy_From_Brazil is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT. The time now is 18:40.


© 1996-2012 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1