![]() |
Originally Posted by 3Greens
(Post 10463305)
how so then? Because your post made me doubt myself so I had a look at my logbook from 1999 when I joined. Seems very similar actually. Every weekend worked. 4 reserves a year. 790 hours. And 5 east coasts a month the norm. Few months with 5 trips and two sims. It has pretty much always been pants (in relative terms), one way or another, at the bottom of a seniority list...on one fleet (744) it was mitigated by seeding the Blindlines with a "decent" trip...(e.g. HRE or GRU), and what saddens me is it appeared around the time of the ballot that many thought getting rid of Bidline would be the answer to all their problems.. Now, we've done "The four Yorkshiremen" ... do we need to think about trying a look on "The Bright Side". Maybe somebody can come up with a solution to weekend working that doesn't drop everybody in the muck...I reckon setting a flying hours target of 750 a year would be a start and might get JSS working as advertised pre-ballot..fat chance of that. |
I thought we were starting on occasions to see to six trips a month on some lines in relatively recent "days of old" under Bidline and Roster assign/FA but I'm probably wrong. Introducing some kind of points system for weekends is an attempt to remove the seniority advantage for that element of monthly bidding. Messing about with inhibitors is an attempt to do away with the seniority advantages there also. We seem to be attempting to use a strict seniority system with a load of sticky plasters. It is true that the BALPA members voted for JSS. When 50% of the pilots are more senior than the others, and many of those in the bottom half recognise they will be in the top half by the time the system comes in, funnily enough, it gets voted in - particularly when tied to a paydeal, it doesn’t mean it is a good system for the guys in the bottom portion. I know plenty of people who are refusing commands purely because they don’t want to give up the huge lifestyle advantages afforded be being senior. |
Plus one to working every weekend when junior, first on short haul, as an FO, then again long haul, a glance at my log book shows the delightful 183/182 combo 4 times in a row, admittedly the 3rd was allocated from TASS, but today’s snowflakes would be at the priory after that! JSS is rubbish, I didn’t vote for it, and those did are stupid for following BALPAs advice, give the promise of a free gift in their packet of cereals and pilots will vote for anything. But JSS is not the problem, it’s the people that promote themselves into a command, then moan about working weekends, like they didn’t know and the people who join a seniority based company, with 34 pay points then moan about it. Those people are the problem! I wanna be a Captain.......... but I shouldn’t, have to work weekends, poor me........ |
"a glance at my log book shows the delightful 183/182 combo 4 times in a row"..
That's nasty..very very nasty.... for those going :confused: take a quick look at the timings of the BA183/182 (available on an Internet near you) and translate it into UK time/UK body clock timing. |
I’ve been with BA for quite a while now. I’ve had the best 22 odd years of my life. Great people to work with, going to great places round the world. I really have had a ball. JSS has changed all of that. If you’re junior you’re going to work every weekend, every month, doing a lot of the most fatiguing trips available with minimum days off. And that’s just long haul, I can’t speak for short haul. Anyone applying, just bear that in mind... |
Originally Posted by wiggy
(Post 10465094)
"a glance at my log book shows the delightful 183/182 combo 4 times in a row"..
That's nasty..very very nasty.... for those going :confused: take a quick look at the timings of the BA183/182 (available on an Internet near you) and translate it into UK time/UK body clock timing. OK you do get two shots at a sleep but my (in-experienced) view would be the sleepy scientists would have a field day with that trip. Looks good on paper I can roster anything job. |
JSS is rubbish, I didnt vote for it, and those did are stupid for following BALPAs advice, give the promise of a free gift in their packet of cereals and pilots will vote for anything. |
Snowflack: “those that promote themselves into a command?” Nobody promotes themselves. They get the opportunity to prove they can meet the required standard. It’s a good job somebody will take a SH command because just imagine how many course failures there would be if we were dragging long term SFO’s from LH to SH LHS against their will. Ryanair has it right. Seniority based on the day you join. Seniority as a captain based on the date you pass your command upgrade. It would solve the problem we have regarding SH command |
Originally Posted by bex88
(Post 10465611)
Ryanair has it right. Seniority based on the day you join. Seniority as a captain based on the date you pass your command upgrade. It would solve the problem we have regarding SH command |
.Ryanair has it right. Seniority based on the day you join. Seniority as a captain based on the date you pass your command upgrade. It would solve the problem we have regarding SH command In passing just an observation that I think might be worth making to avoid any tendency to stereotype parts of the BA workforce: Over the years at BA there have been more than a handful of "long term" Long Haul Co-pilots who have successfully gone to Short Haul for a command by way of a Command conversion. |
Originally Posted by bex88
(Post 10465611)
Snowflack: “those that promote themselves into a command?” You know what he meant; don't be difficult. You joined BA late, got an early short haul command, and now can't stop moaning about the BA / seniority system. Get over it! |
The Blu Ridband. Wrong, wrong and the seniority system is fine as a concept but the delivery of it is not. Since you know me send me a email and I will happily meet you to give you the facts surrounding my position. You are probably misinformed as many are and I don’t blame you for that. Email is just the standard BA one. wiggy, quite correct. It is one of the most challenging courses RHS LH to LHS SH. If you are not committed to it, it will be a much greater ask than it is. It’s the attitude of guys I have flown with that gets me. The system as I said is fine but the attitude of a minority shows a lack of compassion or empathy and in some cases a spiteful enjoyment. Re reading I should have worded my point better. |
No more Short Haul courses until the end of the summer schedule according to latest Comms on yammer. |
Holdpool
Hi All, I’ve been in the BA holdpool for just over 2 months now. Slightly unexpected as we were told during the process that the holdpool was pretty much non-existent and to expect to be called up very quickly. Anyone else been waiting that long, or would anyone that’s recently received an offer be able to let me know how long they were waiting before it came? cheers |
Originally Posted by Stall-turn-Go
(Post 10467968)
Hi All, I’ve been in the BA holdpool for just over 2 months now. Slightly unexpected as we were told during the process that the holdpool was pretty much non-existent and to expect to be called up very quickly. Anyone else been waiting that long, or would anyone that’s recently received an offer be able to let me know how long they were waiting before it came? cheers |
Originally Posted by AIMINGHIGH123
(Post 10468810)
TUI is probably the best at the moment. Unless you’re French or Dutch. KLM pay a massive bonus if TR on joining -we do get a compensation if we still have a pilot loan on the date of joining. -this year is the last year we get a compensation for slashing klms pension contribution to the half. For the last four years. Next year back to normal pension contribution(which is much better than the compensation) |
Originally Posted by AIMINGHIGH123
(Post 10468810)
TUI is probably the best at the moment. Unless you’re French or Dutch. KLM pay a massive bonus if TR on joining |
Originally Posted by The Foss
(Post 10468932)
I wouldn’t think so - there’s people leaving TUI after less than a year to join as type rated 787 at BA. Came across one who’d left tui for a320 as well. Be surprised if any going the other way. |
Originally Posted by AIMINGHIGH123
(Post 10468976)
To be fair I don’t know any moving either way but rosters I have seen plus remuneration, TUI is not bad. How many FOs year 1 or 2 at BA grossing 90k? I know of 3 at TUI from the 6 I personally know. Please give details? I would say something has gone badly wrong with TUIs staffing levels if they are giving every new FO in the business 3 day off working payments a month, even more remarkable considering the seasonality issue of their business. |
I'd say 600 hours quoted above as being a slight exaggeration. At least in my experience - on the 73 fleet my average was around 700 - which when you consider for the winter period I averaged 4/5 flights (even as little as 1 flight) per month, it gives a taste of how busy the summer can be.
the figures quoted above in regards to FOs earning potential within TUI can also be true, but is by no means guaranteed. It has nothing to do with the crewing levels being wrong though. As a charter airline, it has to be adaptable, and therefore crewing at around 80% and offering considerable remuneration to pilots willing to work on days off, is actually cheaper in the long run than having a surplus of pilots and paying for pensions, national insurance, etc for the next however many years. Most duties attract 2 WDO payments, some even 3 - so its quickly quite easy to see how 90k is achievable if 1. The opportunity to work on days off is there, and 2. You are willing to be flexible. |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 12:57. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.