![]() |
Originally Posted by Biggles88
(Post 10491192)
I’ve been in the pool about the same time now. I heard from a source that they have stopped SH training for Aug & Sep as they can’t afford to release the trainers off the line over the busy summer schedule. Not sure how true it is but hopefully courses will start again in the Autumn. |
Pension
Is it possible to transfer the BA pension into a SIPP or are you locked into their scheme?
Thanks in advance! |
Originally Posted by aceman18
(Post 10494494)
Is it possible to transfer the BA pension into a SIPP or are you locked into their scheme?
Thanks in advance! |
You can also transfer money out of BAPP and into your own SIPP any time you like. |
Thanks guys.
|
How long are people waiting in the hold pool for SH recently? I note a post from May from someone saying they’d been waiting two months. |
Originally Posted by Gingerbread Man
(Post 10497451)
How long are people waiting in the hold pool for SH recently? I note a post from May from someone saying they’d been waiting two months. |
Just as bit of news for potential new joiners today, a Chief Pilot video has been delivered to our inboxes (mostly about ongoing industrial negotiations) in which he says he wants to share with us some exciting ideas for flight ops to benefit both us and the company. The cynic in me is guessing he’s referring to Klaus’ 24 hour Long Haul slips downroute :yuk: |
Heisenb3rg I’m guessing it’s got to be the destinations where there are regular and daily flights, Heathrow stuff like Nashville, Durban, Charleston and Gatwick trips like Mauritius and the Maldives etc would stay safe because the schedule simply wouldn’t allow it. For destinations like Los Angeles and San Fran though it’s an utter game changer and I agree with you, there’s literally no point in doing long haul if all you’re doing is slipping 24 hours an an airport hotel downroute. The sickening thing though is they’re (read Klaus is) trying to sell it like it’s in our interests because we’d have more “time at home”. It’s in reality their wet dream to reduce costs even further at the expense of flight safety. This is why we cannot back down now in these industrial negotiations because once BA/IAG management see weakness they’ll be like a cat with its prey, being cruel and vindictive until the life force of the workforce has disappeared. |
How do you know if you’re in the short haul hold pool or not? Are you informed once you’re successful in the sim? |
Originally Posted by Heisenb3rg
(Post 10497766)
Are 24 layovers really on the cards? Would any destination be safe or is that network wide? Because I can’t help but feel if that’s the case there’s surely no point in being long haul? By the time you’ve had a sleep and something to eat, you’ve run out of time to go and do anything other than sit by the pool for a few hours. If the airport hotel even has a pool. |
Not sure of the actual hour requirement Percula however as a junior pilot you’ll be nowhere near the seniority required for the fleet, especially now it’s down to one aircraft. To the best of my recollection it’s actually more senior than the 787 and the rest of the long haul fleets so the required Airbus hours would be a given by the time you achieved that level of seniority. (Unless you joined in Gatwick on the Max :} but that’s another story!) |
Most junior LCY captain 1026 Most junior LCY co-pilot 3327 Most junior 777 captain 1244 Most junior 777 co-pilot 4555 Most junior 787 captain 1608 Most junior 787 co-pilot 4553 Most junior 747 captain 1643 Most junior 747 co-pilot 4531 Most junior A380 captain 1653 Most junior A380 co-pilot 4557 Most junior A350 captain 1803 Most junior A350 co-pilot 3194 So, as Rex says, the LCY Airbus is more senior than other fleets for captains, although the A350 just beats it into second place for co-pilots. It’s certainly more senior than the 787. |
Originally Posted by eckhard
(Post 10497979)
Most junior LCY captain 1026 Most junior LCY co-pilot 3327 Most junior 777 captain 1244 Most junior 777 co-pilot 4555 Most junior 787 captain 1608 Most junior 787 co-pilot 4553 Most junior 747 captain 1643 Most junior 747 co-pilot 4531 Most junior A380 captain 1653 Most junior A380 co-pilot 4557 Most junior A350 captain 1803 Most junior A350 co-pilot 3194 So, as Rex says, the LCY Airbus is more senior than other fleets for captains, although the A350 just beats it into second place for co-pilots. It’s certainly more senior than the 787. |
Are the new joiners on the 380 only Airbus rated?
|
Assessment tips
Hi all,
Does anyone have any advice for the stage 1 computer assessment and verbal reasoning? Any tips would be much appreciated. |
Originally Posted by Heisenb3rg
(Post 10497766)
Are 24 layovers really on the cards? Would any destination be safe or is that network wide? Because I can’t help but feel if that’s the case there’s surely no point in being long haul? By the time you’ve had a sleep and something to eat, you’ve run out of time to go and do anything other than sit by the pool for a few hours. If the airport hotel even has a pool. |
Nearly all EK layovers are 24 hours. Makes it really hard when you have to try and sleep twice in 24 hours. |
Norfolkungood yes but it’s slightly different in Cathay as you’re flying with 4 crew, most BA flights are 3 crew. |
Just to avoid misunderstanding and perhaps raised expectations amongst potential joiners I take it by that you mean most of our "long range" ops is 3 pilot. Obviously (?) there's also a heck of a lot of two pilot work around at BA, even on the Long Haul Fleets.
|
Thanks for clarifying that Wiggy
|
:ok:
Hope that didn't come over as "picky"...I know what you were getting at but would just hate to see you being quoted verbatim by a new joiner to Long Haul who has had sight of his/her first JSS train wreck, with " but you said...:bored:". ATB. |
Who is the Sky God occupying #1 on the seniority list?
|
Somebody just like you. |
Originally Posted by Officer Kite
(Post 10498462)
Who is the Sky God occupying #1 on the seniority list?
|
Are the new joiners on the 380 only Airbus rated? |
Originally Posted by Threethirty
(Post 10498361)
Norfolkungood yes but it’s slightly different in Cathay as you’re flying with 4 crew, most BA flights are 3 crew. True. Unfortunately seems all our lords and masters want to reduce manning/ rest to the minimum to increase the productivity. Our lot would jump at the chance of 3 man. They tried it but as most of our departures are around midnight the FTLs didn’t quite allow it. We now do a large proportion of our LHs with 2 Second Officers as opposed to a 2 FOs. So the FO just gets the wrong rest and still has to be in the seat for landing! Notwithstanding our experience levels have dropped through the floor..... I fear for all of us where this is all leading..... |
If the pay rise offer of 11% over three years were to go ahead would that apply to new joiners’ salaries too or only existing employees? Do guys find they have much savings left over every month with the salary being as low as it is? Being bottom of the seniority list is it not still possible to swap flights once the roster is out and get options in there that you like? Thanks! |
Originally Posted by norfolkungood
(Post 10499089)
True. Unfortunately seems all our lords and masters want to reduce manning/ rest to the minimum to increase the productivity. Our lot would jump at the chance of 3 man. They tried it but as most of our departures are around midnight the FTLs didn’t quite allow it. We now do a large proportion of our LHs with 2 Second Officers as opposed to a 2 FOs. So the FO just gets the wrong rest and still has to be in the seat for landing! Notwithstanding our experience levels have dropped through the floor..... I fear for all of us where this is all leading..... The FO in the seat for the landing will (in theory) have a Captain in a better state of awake than himself. What else? |
Originally Posted by aaa333
(Post 10505082)
If the pay rise offer of 11% over three years were to go ahead would that apply to new joiners’ salaries too or only existing employees? Do guys find they have much savings left over every month with the salary being as low as it is? Being bottom of the seniority list is it not still possible to swap flights once the roster is out and get options in there that you like? Thanks! 2. Savings: Not a new joiner by any stretch of the imagination so can't help...and in any event guess that would depend on personal circumstances ...I'm sure somebody more helpful will be along in a minute. 3. Swopping: Certainly possible, FTLs allowing. Whether you are going to be able to get an option you like :) by getting rid an option you don't like :{ will be down to "taste". Swopping mundane trips to generate days off you want (again FTLs allowing) but it might be a slightly tougher task trying to get rid of an unpopular destination/trip by expecting to be able swop it with something "tasty". |
Originally Posted by Twiglet1
(Post 10505180)
Eventually the 2 Second Officers will get enough experience to be a FO.
The FO in the seat for the landing will (in theory) have a Captain in a better state of awake than himself. What else? |
Originally Posted by CXKA
(Post 10505253)
I have done these 2 SO flights when I was an RQ FO at CX and its all very well having a nicely rested Captain but the FO is trying their hardest just to stay awake. Another cost cutting idea that infringes on the safety of the operation.
|
Originally Posted by cessnapete
(Post 10505261)
BA don’t do “SOs”. On joining all copilots are fully trained and qualified as RHS for two crew ops. As Wiggy says many LH trips on 777/787/744/ and a few on A380 are operated with two crew. For a new LH FO, people are recruited with sufficient big jet hours to allow them, after the Type Rating to operate on two pilot trips immediately after Line Training as FO. |
Thanks for the reply Wiggy :) does anyone have a copy of the current PP payscale that new joiners sign on that they can paste here? Thanks! |
I seem to remember a notice earlier this year detailing training requirements of "cruise pilots" on 777 & 747 for new entrants. They did this on the A380 previously.
|
Originally Posted by CXKA
(Post 10505284)
I was speaking about CX, as for BA we have all seen the various docunet updates that mention cruise only pilots as an interim measure before being fully qualified to the line on LH fleets.
|
Is it true that if you join BA on the A320 based out of LGW you will come home every night with only possibly 1 or 2 lay overs a month?
As for LHR I heard you tend to do tours/trips for 3 or 4 days? Im a 6000 hour pilot with 3000 plus jet hours so I do not know what kind of fleet they would offer me whether it be domestic or international.I have never flown wide body international but the thought of doing that kind of flying is not very appealing to me and from what I have been reading on junior new hires with JSS it just seems like a world of pain. I ask because I am being interviewed by BA in 2 weeks time and if I get thru everything and get a job offer I would like to join on the A320 fleet but probably commute from Europe, most likely Spain where I would plan on living again. So coming home every night would not work for me unless I paid for hotels which kind of defeats the purpose of commuting. I refuse to live in London with all that grime crime and slime as I have a wife and daughter and wont expose them to all that rubbish. Any thoughts are most welcome. |
Originally Posted by Daddy Fantastic
(Post 10508550)
Is it true that if you join BA on the A320 based out of LGW you will come home every night with only possibly 1 or 2 lay overs a month?
As for LHR I heard you tend to do tours/trips for 3 or 4 days? Im a 6000 hour pilot with 3000 plus jet hours so I do not know what kind of fleet they would offer me whether it be domestic or international.I have never flown wide body international but the thought of doing that kind of flying is not very appealing to me and from what I have been reading on junior new hires with JSS it just seems like a world of pain. I ask because I am being interviewed by BA in 2 weeks time and if I get thru everything and get a job offer I would like to join on the A320 fleet but probably commute from Europe, most likely Spain where I would plan on living again. So coming home every night would not work for me unless I paid for hotels which kind of defeats the purpose of commuting. I refuse to live in London with all that grime crime and slime as I have a wife and daughter and wont expose them to all that rubbish. Any thoughts are most welcome. |
Only EDI GLA and JSY night stops from LGW. So you might as well join EZY for a fixed roster if you're going to LGW.
LHR does do tours, but being at the bottom of the list you wont have much say in whether you get them. Coupled in with at least 2 blocks of 3 weeks reserve a year, commuting to LHR for short haul would be tough on the home life too. Long haul is best for commuting, but again, being at the bottom of the list isn't going to get you a great roster, don't forget to add the multiple blocks of reserve every year. With that experience I would seriously try and look elsewhere. There are much better options now, that will pay more, give more days off and be a company that you are actually proud to say that you work for, with a much nicer day out when at work, rather than planning a mission to Mars every report. |
I’m Gatwick based (three years at Heathrow before) and rarely do a day trip in LGW unless it’s called from standby on reserve. However I am senior there and still have to do multiple nights in Gatwick (maybe 10 or so). As others have said not the best base for commuting unless, like me, you live in one of the few nightstop destinations and even then it’s a drag. The workload gets high all year round too if all you’re doing is bidding for nightstops because, by their nature, they’re mostly six sector single nightstops over two days with long links either side. I was told Gatwick was seasonal and quiet in the winter but that doesn’t apply if you ask Carmen for nightstops. Flew 95 hours in January, my first month there, March was just as bad. A lot of nights in my own bed though!! I wouldn’t necessarily say that LGW is more likely than LHR as I think we have nearly a full compliment in the RHS here, maybe a few less. According to iBid and looking at the historic compliment, however, it looks like LHR is under by nearly 30 pilots, possibly more. There’ll be many more unfrozen pilots leaving the Airbus from Heathrow next year than Gatwick too. Gatwick is a far friendlier base and nicer place to work IMHO vs Heathrow, you actually get to know people here and the knob jockeys in the LHS are considerably fewer. The aircraft though are absolutely knackered and the number of MEL items you can be confronted with upon boarding the aircraft for the first time can be frustrating and downright exhausting. More for anyone considering Gatwick vs Heathrow to be honest rather than the original poster.. |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 15:54. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.