PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Terms and Endearment (https://www.pprune.org/terms-endearment-38/)
-   -   BA or Virgin? Which is better? (https://www.pprune.org/terms-endearment/138688-ba-virgin-better.html)

Cattivo 31st October 2018 08:38


Originally Posted by wiggy (Post 10297481)


It’s early so I’ll be polite: whilst what you say might be literally true amongst the “lot” you know, especially if they are relatively new joiners and have been on Blindlines, (now extinct due to JSS) I’m afraid your statement creates a misleading impression of the overall picture at BA.

Like a few in this place I’m able to look at BA’s 900 hour warning lists which gives those close to a legal limit a heads up. One of these, the December BA 777 P2 900 hours warning list, contains the names of everybody on that status who is close to to, above or well above 750 annual flying hours. It has over 100 individuals on it, and a lot of those P2s are actually well up in the 800’s.

It is also worth noting that as a result of the high hours we routinely have a number of pilots having their bidding limited and/or rosters massaged in order to stay below 900 per annum/100 in 28 days.

That state of affairs is fairly standard these days month in, month out, across all the longhaul seats and fleets apart from possibly temporarily the 787. It is not a low hours airline.

It is unlikely the new rostering system at BA will bring hours down by any significant amount.so the facts are don’t for one minute think BA long haul full time is a 750 hour per annum operation.



Wiggy, if you’re laying out these facts to argue how busy we all are you need to also state that a LOT of these individuals will be flying that level of hours by CHOICE. Many individuals chase down the 900 limit to drop trips in December, many pick up overtime to pay for new toys and many will bid way over CAP for whatever reason. I agree it’s not a low hour airline and I may be wrong but I think for the majority, if you don’t want to work that hard, you don’t have to.

DuctOvht 31st October 2018 08:46


I know a lot of people at BA on all LH fleets and know nobody that has done more than 750 hours full time.
Utter nonsense.

I can assure you, from personal experience, that this is very much NOT the case. Many long haul pilots in BA are right up on the limits, constantly.

Don’t be fooled that this is somehow through personal choice either. If you’re senior enough to get triplines inevitably you’re working at or over CAP (to try and avoid Force Assign - where BA can plant a trip across that special event that you’d carefully bid to be off for) then you’ll be damn close to 900hrs. It’s utterly inconceivable that JSS is going to lighten the workload (although FA will be a thing of the past, in theory. In practice these trips will be ‘optimised’ onto rosters, no longer attracting the extra money they currently do). Frankly, the only thing that will improve our lot is more pilots and they cost money, so we will never have enough.

So, to sum up, either they’re lying or you are.

GS-Alpha 31st October 2018 09:38

I have just had a quick skim of the P2 747 high hours list, which means you are in danger of coming up against the annual legal limit. More than one third of the fleet are on it. I find myself on the list, having spent my entire year doing my level best to work as little as possible, and I have the advantage of nearly two decades of seniority on my side. These are facts, not conjecture, or asking ‘a lot’ of my mates.

wiggy 31st October 2018 12:21


Originally Posted by Cattivo (Post 10297539)
Wiggy, if you’re laying out these facts to argue how busy we all are you need to also state that a LOT of these individuals will be flying that level of hours by CHOICE.

Well after about three decades in various positions on senority lists I’d humbly suggest that a lot of the time being above the magic 750 hours is not done by choice, though I’d accept it is more of a factor in the very very high hour cases.

I refer you to the likes of the previous posters, such as Tay Cough, Duct and GS - a lot of full timers at BA are working >750 simply because of it’s the BA way, it is not down to December, Christmas or new toys.



Captain Spam Can 31st October 2018 12:31

It’s good to see some people being honest with the OP. I find that in this industry certain people will only tell you how great something is when nothing is perfect and more often than not the person asking needs the honest answer as the decision will affect his/her family life, financial circumstances etc. I would recommend asking a mature person with a happy family life outside of work and other interests and nothing to gain, an uncompetitive nature and humble. There you will find a balanced opinion which will probably make your nice predicament much tougher.......the grass is always a different shade and the circus is always the same except for the monekys.

flightpattern 31st October 2018 14:06

Thanks all - you make some salient points. Getting an unbiased opinion is difficult - no one wants to talk down on what they’ve worked damn hard to get. Even though this forum tends to go off on tangents, for the most part it’s pilots generously putting their time into helping people like me on deciding their futures, so thanks a million for your contributions & honesty!

FYI I’m already 787 LH, so I am familiar with the lifestyle but if I was to pick based on what I’ve read, it has to be Virgin.. I do like the idea of having SH in the back pocket for the future, and will be hard to turn down the variety of BA so it is a big trade off..

The one bug bear for me is the unknown future of the company. Whilst I appreciate no one has a crystal ball, where do people in virgin see the company going with the new acquisitions and Branson pretty much out the picture?

Optimistically, I think it could have a hugely exciting future. There’s just a small part of me that threats about the long term game plan of Delta & AF KLM, and what their plans are for an iconic but loss making brand.. (I’ve got over 30 years to go (eek))

macdo 31st October 2018 14:15

From what its worth IMHO, having seen a fair few BA and VS rosters, and known people who do both jobs, and you already know what LH is like and you would have zero seniority starting with BA which will only slowly become less onerous, VS is the correct answer. If your lifestyle changes in the future and you want stable SH, move to Easyjet :-)

BitMoreRightRudder 31st October 2018 15:33

What a great position - kudos to you for having the 2 offers on the table..

From my viewpoint the big plus for BA is job security, though bear in mind Virgin have a significant presence at LHR. Their slot pairings are worth millions. In the (very) unlikely event they went to the wall, those slots would be fought over by several large airlines, and the aircraft and crews would I imagine end up flying for the winner of the slot war. So IMHO a job at VA is pretty darn safe, just the future of the brand is in question, more so than at BA anyway. Maybe job certainty, as in who you are working for, is a better way to put it.

The biggest plus for Virgin I can see is the 750hrs and rotating seniority. That’s a fantastic draw. We have had guys leave BA LH for VA. Don’t think we get many going the other way? The VA guys I’ve met down route seem very happy with their lot. For the record I’m BA LH p2 and it’s hard work and noticeably so the last year or so. The new rostering system has really thrown up a big question mark over the future and the potential lifestyle we can all expect, especially for the junior. It’s BA’s brexit basically. No one really knows.

Anyway, tough call but a nice problem to have - good luck and enjoy either way!

Jumbo2 31st October 2018 16:29

Since it got mentioned earlier on every time I taxi past Terminal 3 I notice more and more Delta aircraft at the gates and less Virgin Aircraft. I get the feeling Virgin is expending at places like Manchester and Gatwick but shrinking at Heathrow. Since I don't work for Virgin this is just an observation. Is it a correct observation that Delta has taken over quite a few of the Virgin slots at Heathrow or are they just covering the slots because of the ongoing 787 engine problems?

sudden twang 31st October 2018 18:02

There are subtle things to consider also:
How many positioning sectors do you do/ year? Are they counted in the 900/750? In what cabin?
many transits by road?
pension contributions?
LOL?
Private health?
Training vacancies ( if that’s your bag)
Staff travel VS much better
Ease of commute ( I’d much rather be BA if living ion mainland Europe)
I could go on it’s not easy best of luck.

wiggy 1st November 2018 07:34

Clamchowder:


Not having access to your system I can't do anything but judge on what I hear. It is a FACT that 100% of my ex-colleagues and friends at BA are sat under 750, one laughing about the quiet year on 650.
To which I would ask:

1. What Fleet(s) are they on, and
2. Are they on Blindlines
3. Are they doing a lot of reserve?

Under the BA system it is hard to keep the flying hours down to 750 when the credited hours target set by the company ( which is very roughly speaking sum of flying plus all other duties, with some factoring to cater for long slips,ground duties etc) is 1051 (Long haul), unless you fall into one or more of the following categories:

1. You are on a fleet that is suffering a lot of downtime, :oh:

2. On a fleet that has a high percentage of “long” slips (i.e. 48 hours or more, so your credit earned might be based on factored time away from base rather than flight time )

3. On Blindlines (where some credit earned is by virtue of being available to the company for work but possibly not actually flying)

4. Or are doing a lot of unused reserve (ditto).

Some or a combination of those will produce lowish flying hours outliers...Whatever the reason for your contacts lack of flying they should enjoy it whilst they can.....(especially the Blindline holders with the advent of JSS).

OTOH the average full time line pilot exposed to triplines on longhaul fleets with a high percentage of nightstops such as the 777 and most especially now the 747 will struggle to keep the flying hours below 750.

By way of example I went part time years ago (there’s a message in itself), I do triplines, I never pick up extra work and fortunately I'm senior enough to pick up the occasional relatively high credit but relatively low flying hours trip. If I pro-rata my annual flying hours up to a full time equivalent I’m always above 750, usually up around 780 -820...Given I've been using the system for more than a handful of years I'd suggest that is not chance or carelessness, that's just the way it works for a lot of pilots at BA..

Sorry this has turned into a long post but fundamentally IMVHO you cannot look at BA rostering, as actually worked by a significant number of the BA pilot workforce, and put it on a par with the Virgin 750 hour agreement, which is what it appears you are trying to do.

Mylius 1st November 2018 10:19

Forget about hours for a second, has anyone thought about the dynamics of the seniority list which you might be about to join? BA has recruited around 1500 pilots in the last decade or so which accounts for a third of the pilot workforce. It’s a big bubble which puts new joiners at the back of quite a long queue for everything (especially LH commands). Virgin’s expansion is possibly yet to come.

Combined with 34 pay points now you really have to invest a great deal of time in BA to reap the rewards of seniority (which will no doubt be diluted by JSS but that’s another thing...)

Sure, you get to travel in First class at BA, you get credit for positioning sectors, the top scale Capt salary is more, the variety of destinations is incredible, but if you are looking for a career move in your 30s then Virgin would probably be the place to go now just for speed of progression. If you’re in your early 20s then BA can offer you a very good career.

Any airline that wants to make money won’t have its pilots sitting around at home all day. 750 hours is a very good headline but if you factor in positioning sectors, time spent on a coach back from Glasgow, I wonder whether that changes the picture at all?

As for job security....let’s face it neither airline is going anywhere is it?

Just my thoughts. Flame away.

Riskybis 1st November 2018 10:28


Originally Posted by Mylius (Post 10298686)
Forget about hours for a second, has anyone thought about the dynamics of the seniority list which you might be about to join? BA has recruited around 1500 pilots in the last decade or so which accounts for a third of the pilot workforce. It’s a big bubble which puts new joiners at the back of quite a long queue for everything (especially LH commands). Virgin’s expansion is possibly yet to come.

Combined with 34 pay points now you really have to invest a great deal of time in BA to reap the rewards of seniority (which will no doubt be diluted by JSS but that’s another thing...)

Sure, you get to travel in First class at BA, you get credit for positioning sectors, the top scale Capt salary is more, the variety of destinations is incredible, but if you are looking for a career move in your 30s then Virgin would probably be the place to go now just for speed of progression. If you’re in your early 20s then BA can offer you a very good career.

Any airline that wants to make money won’t have its pilots sitting around at home all day. 750 hours is a very good headline but if you factor in positioning sectors, time spent on a coach back from Glasgow, I wonder whether that changes the picture at all?

As for job security....let’s face it neither airline is going anywhere is it?

Just my thoughts. Flame away.

the only guys that would be on a coach back from Glasgow would be the 747 guys and girls as I believe they do a Glasgow - Orlando ?

Tricia Takanawa 1st November 2018 11:01

Anything over 30 I would head to VS personally for the reasons quoted above, unless you really want short haul. In that case, head to easyJet.

BA only really has 2 pros:
1. Job security. They're making cash hand over fist. (Ask yourself how... LHR slots (What happens if the 3rd RWY is approved). Old aeroplanes that are owned, but will cripple the airline if the oil price rockets as they'll suddenly need to invest in new airframes, but the production waitlist for 350/787 etc is long. And above all COST CUTTING.)
2. Variety if you want to try different places/fleets etc. (Already being long haul, Im sure you've realised that after around 4 years the excitement of visiting places for 24/48 hours soon wears thin)

VS pros.
Retirement bulge coming = Fast cmd, and increased seniority.
Better pay initially inc pension on flight pay.
Being at the bottom of a BA seniority list, looking at JSS coming in, ROTATING SENIORITY is a huge plus. This means at least every 3 months you'll be bidding at 33% down the list, getting some important days off. OK 1 in 3 months will be :{, but in BA that will be 12 in 12 months. When you do get some seniority, it is still rewarded as your worst month will now be 88% and best 22%, BA every month will be 66%, just about starting to get some weekends etc.
750 Hours PA! Granted sims etc don't count, but as Wiggy mentioned, they don't really in BA either as we work to 1051 credit hours. For info, leave is only credited around 2:51 per day. So 14 days leave in a month leaves circa 48 hours left to work in 2 weeks, ignoring wrap days.

Ignoring all of the above, they both seem to have very different cultures. At the end of the day, you need to fit in. Are you Red or Blue?

stiflersmom 1st November 2018 11:24

First off, congrats flightpattern, you're in a great position.

I'm BA P2 LH and reasonably senior. I agree with your pro's and con's although I'd also highlight that the time to command in Virgin is likely to be very much shorter than in BA. The current time to command for LH in BA is around 18+ years, whereas my mates in Virgin seem to be coming up for command after about 12 years at the moment. From what they tell me that time to command is likely to reduce further due to the upcoming retirement bulge in Virgin. While BA recruitment is racing ahead we still have a lot of relatively young LH Captains as a product of the cadet scheme back in the 90's who understandably wont be going anywhere for a while yet. BA short haul commands are currently coming up after as little as 2 or 3 years although there's a reason for this! I think you'd struggle to find many pilots in BA who would say that full time BA SH is a sustainable career choice so I'd weigh that against the pro of being able to switch between LH and SH.

My own experience is that most BA LH pilots will be doing something north of 800 hours before overtime. As stated above blindlines, reserve and or broken aircraft ala 787, will keep your hours lower than average although pilot shortages on certain fleets and triplines will keep your hours high.

The rotating seniority at Virgin is a massive plus to my mind. I did nearly 10 years of blind lines albeit with hindsight I could and should have bid off my fleet sooner to get more control. My situation was unusual as a result of the retirement age being extended and being on a very senior fleet but my point is that if there is unforeseen stagnation for any reason you could find yourself stuck at the bottom for a long time whereas at Virgin at least you'd still have the opportunity to have some control over your working life. Just note that on achieving a new command at BA, you'll be back to the bottom of your seniority list and have to work your way up all over again, although you would go across to the P1 pay scales at your current pay point whereas in Virgin you'd go back to P1 pp1.

The pensions at both airlines are similar now but bear in mind you'd be joining BA onto 34 paypoints (changed from 24 a few years ago) also that Virgin has a higher starting salary and the potential for a much quicker command at Virgin while working approx 10% fewer hours than at BA and I could certainly see a strong case for going to Virgin over BA. I have a mate who joined BA in 2004 and shortly thereafter resigned to go to Virgin. When he resigned the BA manager was aghast as to why he would leave BA to join a lesser airline! He's now a Captain, quite happy as far as I can tell and steadily moving up the seniority list whereas in BA he'd be a relatively senior FO on any LH fleet, with about 4-5 years to go to command, earning a lot less than he currently does and working 10% harder for it!

Good luck with whatever you decide.

macdo 1st November 2018 15:29

Someone up above commented 'are you red or blue?'. That's a very important factor to consider as the two airlines are very different habitats. Over the long term this could be a deal killer if you select the wrong one for your personality.

Ennie 1st November 2018 16:04

So.... 14 years on, where did you go?

Pickled 2nd November 2018 16:09

In BA senior LH pilots normally fly the longer flights, the junior pilots tend to do the East Coast, Central Africa and Middle East. The junior pilots work harder, have more fatigue, but may not do as many flying hours per year.

Comparing flying hours is not everything, but junior BA pilots will normally work considerably harder than Virgin pilots. You will normally be junior at least twice, on joining and when first getting a LH command (more than 2 times if you go DEP, SH command, LH command).

20+ years ago a friend and I left our previous airline at the same time, he chose Virgin and I chose BA. He has earned far more money than me (LH command 13 years earlier), worked less and had far more fun. I chose BA at the time because it seemed more secure. BA outsources every job that they practically can, but that is most unlikely to apply to line pilots (training is another matter). I still think that BA offers greater security but wish that I had joined Virgin all those years ago.

RexBanner 3rd November 2018 08:20


Originally Posted by Pickled (Post 10299832)
BA outsources every job that they practically can, but that is most unlikely to apply to line pilots (training is another matter)

Just goes to show the power of the rumour mill. The possible outsourcing of training was a Chinese whisper that apparently rose and grew out of all proportion out of nothing more sinister than the maintanence of the TBA/TBC buildings being under consideration for outsourcing. BA have already investigated outsourcing training a couple of years back but decided it was cheaper to keep it in house, amongst other reasons.



Tay Cough 3rd November 2018 11:43

Some SH training has been outsourced to L3 for capacity reasons, I believe. Although that has caused some issues of it’s own apparently.

flightpattern 6th November 2018 14:51

Thanks all for your honesty, advice & input - it really has made for an interesting read and helped make an informed decision.

cefey 6th November 2018 15:18

Could anyone be so kind and explain red vs blue thing? How is culture/mentality in each of the companies? Thanks!

BleedingOn 6th November 2018 17:12


Originally Posted by cefey (Post 10303459)
Could anyone be so kind and explain red vs blue thing? How is culture/mentality in each of the companies? Thanks!

Blue = confident in the knowledge that one is working for the worlds favourite airline

Red = Fur coat and no knickers. All about the brand

Actually these are sweeping generalisations: there are great guys and a few not so great working at both. My impression is that crew interaction levels are overall better at VS than BA, but mixed fleet crews have certainly made that gap closer.

Hope that helps!

Riskybis 6th November 2018 17:46


Originally Posted by BleedingOn (Post 10303561)


Blue = confident in the knowledge that one is working for the worlds favourite airline

Red = Fur coat and no knickers. All about the brand

Actually these are sweeping generalisations: there are great guys and a few not so great working at both. My impression is that crew interaction levels are overall better at VS than BA, but mixed fleet crews have certainly made that gap closer.

Hope that helps!

God it makes me so sick “ the worlds favourite airline “
BA has rapidly gone downhill, anyone that goes to work and thinks that is probably a bit of a c@ck or a thoroughbred Nigel ( basically the same )

Virgin looks way more exciting than BA

Tay Cough 6th November 2018 19:41

BA hasn’t used the “world’s favourite” tagline for decades. Technically, it was actually correct at the time.

“JAFA” could possibly be a better one these days.:}

Barcli 7th November 2018 15:44


Originally Posted by Riskybis (Post 10303595)


God it makes me so sick “ the worlds favourite airline “
BA has rapidly gone downhill, anyone that goes to work and thinks that is probably a bit of a c@ck or a thoroughbred Nigel ( basically the same )

Virgin looks way more exciting than BA

Trust me there are about 4000 that think it and believe it......

Jumbo2 7th November 2018 19:49


Originally Posted by Barcli (Post 10304588)
Trust me there are about 4000 that think it and believe it......

And you know them all on a personal level to make such a statement?

This topic was going so well with respect for each other, until Riskybis and Barcli came along...

2 Whites 2 Reds 7th November 2018 20:00


Originally Posted by Barcli (Post 10304588)
Trust me there are about 4000 that think it and believe it......

There's approximately 4300 pilots in BA and during my 4 years in the company I can assure you that the ratio of c@ck : good guy/girl is no different than anywhere else. The misconception that we're all a bunch of Nigel's poncing around thinking we're the best is frankly just outdated utter b@ll@x.

RexBanner 7th November 2018 20:51


Originally Posted by 2 Whites 2 Reds (Post 10304813)
during my 4 years in the company I can assure you that the ratio of c@ck : good guy/girl is no different than anywhere else

If we’re talking Short Haul, my experience of it is that I had far more great days out at easyJet in my year there than I’ve had in 3 years at BA. The severe lack of pragmatism of many in the LHS at BA and minutiae driven briefings and stress levels in that seat are noticeably higher than any other airline I’ve worked for. They aren’t deliberately awkward or difficult individuals by nature outside of the flightdeck but boy do they make it hard work in the flightdeck. I don’t know if it’s something that you can blame those guys for as such I’ve got a feeling that it’s being driven by the training department here.

Riskybis 7th November 2018 21:14


Originally Posted by Jumbo2 (Post 10304807)
And you know them all on a personal level to make such a statement?

This topic was going so well with respect for each other, until Riskybis and Barcli came along...

Jumbo

its just my opinion , the reason is that I believe many colleagues in BA are watching there back , almost terrified of management .
Are you still on SH ? if so you haven’t flown with the wonderful captains we have on the 787 fleet .

wiggy 8th November 2018 06:32


its just my opinion , the reason is that I believe many colleagues in BA are watching there (sic) back , almost terrified of management .
I have to say I’ve never sensed anyone on the line being terrified of this lot or previous management, so I’m puzzled by that- in what context and in what way is this fear manifesting itself? Is it as in: “we’d better not bust the stable approach criteria” , or as in “ I’m not delaying the departure just because we have been under catered/just because we arrived late at the aircraft side :rolleyes:

I think being “aware” of the former is fair enough isn’t it? OTOH I’d agree there are one or two colleagues who can behave like Boy Scouts over some issues where we could take a legitimate stand.

Most of us on most Fleets get through the day not thinking much about management...if we do it is just to marvel at the thickness of the silo walls and annoyance at level of competence displayed by some at Waterside.

Riskybis 8th November 2018 07:20


Originally Posted by wiggy (Post 10305081)


I have to say I’ve never sensed anyone on the line being terrified of this lot or previous management, so I’m puzzled by that- in what context and in what way is this fear manifesting itself? Is it as in: “we’d better not bust the stable approach criteria” , or as in “ I’m not delaying the departure just because we have been under catered/just because we arrived late at the aircraft side :rolleyes:

I think being “aware” of the former is fair enough isn’t it? OTOH I’d agree there are one or two colleagues who can behave like Boy Scouts over some issues where we could take a legitimate stand.

Most of us on most Fleets get through the day not thinking much about management...if we do it is just to marvel at the thickness of the silo walls and annoyance at level of competence displayed by some at Waterside.

Don’t get me wrong , all the guys I have flown with have been very professional .
I think it’s just on the last few trips I have done , my gears have grinded down with some of the guys I have flown with .
Just bad luck I guess ..... Hopefully next roster will be ok

FACoff 8th November 2018 11:48


Originally Posted by RexBanner (Post 10304838)


If we’re talking Short Haul, my experience of it is that I had far more great days out at easyJet in my year there than I’ve had in 3 years at BA. The severe lack of pragmatism of many in the LHS at BA and minutiae driven briefings and stress levels in that seat are noticeably higher than any other airline I’ve worked for. They aren’t deliberately awkward or difficult individuals by nature outside of the flightdeck but boy do they make it hard work in the flightdeck. I don’t know if it’s something that you can blame those guys for as such I’ve got a feeling that it’s being driven by the training department here.

Absolutely spot on. I never knew how difficult a single sector could be made until I joined BA - I regularly find myself in total disbelief as the guy next to me conducts a 30 minute brief on a straight forward approach in CAVOK conditions. Even returning to LHR can be turned into a long drawn out affair. As you say, an astonishing lack of pragmatism.

Some places on the network obviously warrant proper discussion, and I appreciate many people have also come from long haul where briefings presumably become a novelty. But we're flying 6 day blocks, comprising anything up to 20 sectors, and you have to adjust accordingly. Quizzing me about the rad alt or MSA on our 5th approach into Heathrow will a) totally disengage me and b) make me want to punch you.

It's definitely something I think ought to be addressed in the training department as I’ve found it makes for an altogether more tiring day - especially if you’re with one of these people for 4 or 5 days in a row.

Riskybis 8th November 2018 12:24


Originally Posted by FACoff (Post 10305300)
Absolutely spot on. I never knew how difficult a single sector could be made until I joined BA - I regularly find myself in total disbelief as the guy next to me conducts a 30 minute brief on a straight forward approach in CAVOK conditions. Even returning to LHR can be turned into a long drawn out affair. As you say, an astonishing lack of pragmatism.

Some places on the network obviously warrant proper discussion, and I appreciate many people have also come from long haul where briefings presumably become a novelty. But we're flying 6 day blocks, comprising anything up to 20 sectors, and you have to adjust accordingly. Quizzing me about the rad alt or MSA on our 5th approach into Heathrow will a) totally disengage me and b) make me want to punch you.

It's definitely something I think ought to be addressed in the training department as I’ve found it makes for an altogether more tiring day - especially if you’re with one of these people for 4 or 5 days in a row.

Spot on sir

wiggy 8th November 2018 12:54

OK..I can see where you are coming from...

Once upon a time time we could almost get away with ”Bovingdon, 27L, any questions” on Longhaul, Route Checks excepted...over the years the whole song and dance act has grown..but don’t blame it all on the people in the LHS..trust me there are plenty of your colleagues in the RHS who insist on briefing every item on the “Wheel of Doom” for a CAVOK departure out of LHR.

akindofmagic 8th November 2018 13:06

Interesting discussion on briefings. I tend to tune out fairly quickly if the other bloke or bloke-ess is droning on. Briefings lose their effectiveness very quickly if they're too verbose, and in my experience the people who do the longest briefs tend to miss out the bits which are actually important.

As an aside, a colleague (to prove people weren't listening to briefs) once said "At the end of the runway I will ask for both FACs off, pull into a vertical climb and perform a flick roll off the top of the loop." It didn't register with the FO.

Wireless 8th November 2018 13:26


Originally Posted by Riskybis (Post 10305127)


Don’t get me wrong , all the guys I have flown with have been very professional .
I think it’s just on the last few trips I have done , my gears have grinded down with some of the guys I have flown with .
Just bad luck I guess ..... Hopefully next roster will be ok

i sympathise. Luckily on my fleet we have a tonne of “good folk” who just want to be partners in arms getting around with as little hassle as possible. Granted there’s a fair few Richard heads who I swear would have little propellers fitted on top of their epaulettes and even bigger Russian style hats if they could. I’ve just had a decent run of working with some really top folk and came away really enjoying the chats about non works stuff. But I know what it’s like when you do have a run of challenging ones. Can really suck the life out of it. A small example that doesn’t help is more than a few misunderstand the post flight review is meant to be a team thing, instead they seize the opportunity to play “have a go sim debrief”. Can make for that final little miserable draining experience to cap off on the way home on what is already a thankless job if you’ve been flying with someone who’s psychologically hard work.

I think it’s made worse both by LH and that BA are huge, it’s always new faces so pot luck. Some say that’s a positive as you rarely have to fly with any Richard heads frequently. But I found when I did fly frequently with Richard heads at previous airlines you actually could adapt to each other and in the end it wasn’t so bad really.

WRT the superiority. I personally only have seen it in a the minority of people on the line, but it definitely exists. More indoctrination I think. The majority of colleagues on my fleet seem normal balanced folk to me. Granted everyone is indoctrinated by the “BA way” but that’s not their fault as we all know it’s what this firm want from us. I think the superiority, super science “let’s make this job as hard as poss” level stuff really starts from the training dept level up into management. One of my joining letters even had something like “BA has the best pilots bla bla” or something like that. Nearly fell over. Had to pinch myself that we weren’t in 1930s colonial Britain :). I thought I might possibly be in the wrong place at that point ha! :)

islandhopper 8th November 2018 14:17

With all of the above comments it would indicate that Virgin is best :D

Riskybis 8th November 2018 14:44


Originally Posted by islandhopper (Post 10305423)
With all of the above comments it would indicate that Virgin is best :D

for pure enjoyment of the job and lifestyle I would have to agree , never really seen the guys or girls moan about Virgin ..... which says something

3Greens 8th November 2018 15:20


Originally Posted by RexBanner (Post 10304838)


If we’re talking Short Haul, my experience of it is that I had far more great days out at easyJet in my year there than I’ve had in 3 years at BA. The severe lack of pragmatism of many in the LHS at BA and minutiae driven briefings and stress levels in that seat are noticeably higher than any other airline I’ve worked for. They aren’t deliberately awkward or difficult individuals by nature outside of the flightdeck but boy do they make it hard work in the flightdeck. I don’t know if it’s something that you can blame those guys for as such I’ve got a feeling that it’s being driven by the training department here.

have you ever considered that it may be you? Or something that you’re doing that’s the problem? Just a thought; because, the odd one excepted, I don’t recognise your description of BA at all.


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:34.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.