Easyjet Madness
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: AUS
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Jet2 have EZY in their sights. They’ve removed TUI as the main package holiday threat and now seem to be after EZY. The Liverpool base opening is the first sign of this and plenty more to come.
They’re already taking a lot of their Pilot’s (trainers?) so I wonder will we see J2 push into LGW?
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: everywhere
Posts: 447
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Regarding the arrogance bit, i would tend to agree. How can you hire co pilots with 1000 hrs and ask them to pay for their type rating?
The difference between J2 and Ezy is that J2 have adults running the company whereas Ezy is run by former cabin crew who have no idea about the operational side of running an airline. In my time at the Orange mob the pilot side of the management seemed to be non-existent with everything delegated to managers who seemed to terrify most of the employees.
Surely this would come under discrimination… i do agree it is madness in the hiring climate we currently have to be charging for type ratings to anyone let alone experienced first officers. I know for a fact we are losing left and right seat pilots to J2 and EK. Plus the usual lot to virgin and BA. From what I’ve seen so far this summer it looks as if numbers are tight especially so in the right seat. Not the chaos of last summer, but we aren’t yet at peak flying.
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: UK
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You posted incorrect information on the Amy Johnson thread in 2019 including about this.
Join Date: Jun 2022
Location: Seattle
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It’s called “positive discrimination”. Which is discrimination. What’s much more interesting is what happened to the poster girl.
Also easyJet don’t get the numbers wrong; this is how they run the airline. It’s a cyclical thing and has been occurring roughly very three years since it’s inception. It won’t change because they don’t want it change.
Also easyJet don’t get the numbers wrong; this is how they run the airline. It’s a cyclical thing and has been occurring roughly very three years since it’s inception. It won’t change because they don’t want it change.
)
Join Date: May 2018
Location: london
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
At least a stopped clock is correct twice a day. A320LGW can never be accused of such a high hit rate
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Earth
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There is an issue here of an airline appearing to promote diversity, whilst for many years recruiting school leavers via CTC / L3 with the family means to pay 100K+ for their training. How socially and economically diverse is the group of young pilots who have the family backing to pay this?
Join Date: Mar 2022
Location: Scotland
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There is an issue here of an airline appearing to promote diversity, whilst for many years recruiting school leavers via CTC / L3 with the family means to pay 100K+ for their training. How socially and economically diverse is the group of young pilots who have the family backing to pay this?
Doesn’t matter whether your parents are millionaires or from a council estate. Once you have a uniform on there’s no telling your background so why bother increasing diversity that can’t be virtue signalled ?
Whenever you see a group photo of new starter pilots on social media being promoted (usually 6-8 white males) someone always comments “it would be nice to see more females” or “it would be nice to see more people of colour”. No one ever comments “They all look rich, it would be nice to see someone from a council estate in Barnsley” because that can’t be determined from a photo and therefore the airline can’t receive negative comments
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: everywhere
Posts: 447
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Kendrick I take it you are still salty from my light hearted comment on the virgin thread about a year ago .. do move on, life is too short my dear friend
As for the link, there is nothing on the link regarding payment so it neither proves nor disproves anything
As for the link, there is nothing on the link regarding payment so it neither proves nor disproves anything
Self Sponsored ratings
Simply put, telling people not to go for self-sponsored ratings does not work.
I was the fool who followed that advice back in the early 2000s when the bar was set at 500 multi. Off I went to “do things the right way” and build up 500 hours of multi, and in the interim the industry became almost exclusively self sponsored. I saw the next twenty years of my career involve a hard slog to get back on economic parity with my peers, some who are close friends, who self-sponsored. I’ve never paid for a rating in my career, but would have had a much easier ride if I did.
It’s akin to telling a drowning man to let go of a piece of string as it’s not strong enough to hold their weight. You can shout, “wait for a rope!” They’re still going to grab it.
Those inside the industry need to fight equally as hard to put down self-sponsored ratings. Hire talent, not just the wallet. It’s in all of our interests to do so, not just the young wannabes who don’t have many options.
I was the fool who followed that advice back in the early 2000s when the bar was set at 500 multi. Off I went to “do things the right way” and build up 500 hours of multi, and in the interim the industry became almost exclusively self sponsored. I saw the next twenty years of my career involve a hard slog to get back on economic parity with my peers, some who are close friends, who self-sponsored. I’ve never paid for a rating in my career, but would have had a much easier ride if I did.
It’s akin to telling a drowning man to let go of a piece of string as it’s not strong enough to hold their weight. You can shout, “wait for a rope!” They’re still going to grab it.
Those inside the industry need to fight equally as hard to put down self-sponsored ratings. Hire talent, not just the wallet. It’s in all of our interests to do so, not just the young wannabes who don’t have many options.
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: everywhere
Posts: 447
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I fully agree about self sponsored ratings. I regularly see people brag on linkedin that they are doing things "the right way" and not paying for a rating (pay2fly as they call it). They often fly things such as DA42s for some small surveying op or similar.
Whilst noble in their intentions, I cannot help but think that in 3 yrs a person who paid at RYR or another airline is eligible to apply for Emirates, whilst their options in 3yrs will pretty much be similar to whatever it is they are doing right now. That income difference is the type rating money paid back ... has it not occurred to them??
Whilst noble in their intentions, I cannot help but think that in 3 yrs a person who paid at RYR or another airline is eligible to apply for Emirates, whilst their options in 3yrs will pretty much be similar to whatever it is they are doing right now. That income difference is the type rating money paid back ... has it not occurred to them??
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Earth
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I fully agree about self sponsored ratings. I regularly see people brag on linkedin that they are doing things "the right way" and not paying for a rating (pay2fly as they call it). They often fly things such as DA42s for some small surveying op or similar.
Whilst noble in their intentions, I cannot help but think that in 3 yrs a person who paid at RYR or another airline is eligible to apply for Emirates, whilst their options in 3yrs will pretty much be similar to whatever it is they are doing right now. That income difference is the type rating money paid back ... has it not occurred to them??
Whilst noble in their intentions, I cannot help but think that in 3 yrs a person who paid at RYR or another airline is eligible to apply for Emirates, whilst their options in 3yrs will pretty much be similar to whatever it is they are doing right now. That income difference is the type rating money paid back ... has it not occurred to them??
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: BR
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The problem of self sponsored type rating as the "best" possibility for a first job was a monster created by pilots who wanted to fast track to an airline job without going through the "hassle" of hour building. Some airlines wisely realized people were willing to pay for this and started offering this program and freed themselves the responsibility of financing training for their own pilots, which is the rule in most places worldwide.
Now this monster is too big and no one knows how to defeat it, as you can see from posts above. Those who decide to follow the traditional career path of hour building flying small airplanes and/or regional airlines get behind financially compared to those who pay for a type rating right out of flight school and start flying a B737/A320 as their first job.
I honestly don't know how this can be solved since saying "don't pay for it" does not work. People are willing to pay for it. Only a change in regulations would force airlines to pay for the training of their own pilots.
Now this monster is too big and no one knows how to defeat it, as you can see from posts above. Those who decide to follow the traditional career path of hour building flying small airplanes and/or regional airlines get behind financially compared to those who pay for a type rating right out of flight school and start flying a B737/A320 as their first job.
I honestly don't know how this can be solved since saying "don't pay for it" does not work. People are willing to pay for it. Only a change in regulations would force airlines to pay for the training of their own pilots.