Working Life After Flying
I’m pleased to see your experience in airline recruitment Calypso, that’s an experience I don’t have.
However, what I do have is a 36 year career in aviation during which time I have worked for eight airlines and undertaken six type ratings. I’ve never put any money up front into any sort of “cadetship”, I’ve never worked just for flight pay in order to get a type rating, but it did take ten years of hard aviation graft and 5000 hours in GA before I got a job in an airline. To my mind it’s not people who might be prepared to take a pay cut to keep their jobs in the face of an unprecedented global pandemic who are destroying this profession. It was destroyed when companies like Astreus, Ryanair, EasyJet and all the others started to schemes where holders of fATPLs could get a type rating and then fly for 500 hours effectively for free in the hope of getting a permanent job. But even then those schemes wouldn’t have destroyed the profession and started a race to the bottom unless those fATPL holders hadn’t jumped on the band wagon to avoid working their way up through instructing, single crew air taxi, regional turboprops etc on the way to a shiny jet.
And you’re right, the maths about career earnings is simple. Having had to survive for some of those years on savings due to airline failures I, unlike you, couldn’t afford to sit at home waiting for the good times to come back. And if I did in two years time I would be looking for a job having no current type rating, not having flown for two years, having only three years to retirement and competing with thousands of out of work pilots from BA, Virgin, Norwegian, Thomas Cook, Flybe, Emirates and possibly every other airline on the planet.
So however much you want to pontificate I will do what I need to do to keep a job and put the money in the bank that my family needs, and I’m sure I won’t be alone in that. And if that means accepting a pay cut for a while then I’ll do it. And if that means that someone with ten or twenty or thirty years of earning potential ahead of them are upset then so be it, why should I sacrifice what is left of my career to help you with yours.
However, what I do have is a 36 year career in aviation during which time I have worked for eight airlines and undertaken six type ratings. I’ve never put any money up front into any sort of “cadetship”, I’ve never worked just for flight pay in order to get a type rating, but it did take ten years of hard aviation graft and 5000 hours in GA before I got a job in an airline. To my mind it’s not people who might be prepared to take a pay cut to keep their jobs in the face of an unprecedented global pandemic who are destroying this profession. It was destroyed when companies like Astreus, Ryanair, EasyJet and all the others started to schemes where holders of fATPLs could get a type rating and then fly for 500 hours effectively for free in the hope of getting a permanent job. But even then those schemes wouldn’t have destroyed the profession and started a race to the bottom unless those fATPL holders hadn’t jumped on the band wagon to avoid working their way up through instructing, single crew air taxi, regional turboprops etc on the way to a shiny jet.
And you’re right, the maths about career earnings is simple. Having had to survive for some of those years on savings due to airline failures I, unlike you, couldn’t afford to sit at home waiting for the good times to come back. And if I did in two years time I would be looking for a job having no current type rating, not having flown for two years, having only three years to retirement and competing with thousands of out of work pilots from BA, Virgin, Norwegian, Thomas Cook, Flybe, Emirates and possibly every other airline on the planet.
So however much you want to pontificate I will do what I need to do to keep a job and put the money in the bank that my family needs, and I’m sure I won’t be alone in that. And if that means accepting a pay cut for a while then I’ll do it. And if that means that someone with ten or twenty or thirty years of earning potential ahead of them are upset then so be it, why should I sacrifice what is left of my career to help you with yours.
It was destroyed when companies like Astreus, Ryanair, EasyJet and all the others started to schemes where holders of fATPLs could get a type rating and then fly for 500 hours effectively for free in the hope of getting a permanent job. But even then those schemes wouldn’t have destroyed the profession and started a race to the bottom unless those fATPL holders hadn’t jumped on the band wagon to avoid working their way up through instructing, single crew air taxi, regional turboprops etc on the way to a shiny jet.
Who was seating in the LH seat of a Ryanair flight 15 year ago, a 200h fATPL pilot or an experienced one?
Nothing new here.
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: IRS NAV ONLY
Posts: 1,230
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Most people won't have a home, if they don't work for 2 years.
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Europe
Posts: 704
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So however much you want to pontificate I will do what I need to do to keep a job and put the money in the bank that my family needs, and I’m sure I won’t be alone in that. And if that means accepting a pay cut for a while then I’ll do it. And if that means that someone with ten or twenty or thirty years of earning potential ahead of them are upset then so be it, why should I sacrifice what is left of my career to help you with yours.
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Borders
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As I've previously suggested, pilot salaries were ripe for a "refresh" and this situation has provided airline management with the ideal excuse to take the axe to Ts&Cs. From an accountant's point of view, it is easy to see why £100k+ salaries are unjustifiable for a role which has an extremely low (academic) bar to entry, has massive oversupply and is highly aspirational. The "new normal" will be captains on train driver salaries (without any of the associated benefits) and first officers either paying to be there or on minimum wage, zero hours contracts. It's no good stomping our feet and pretending that it isn't the case. The salaries we enjoyed three months ago will be comfortably the highest the vast majority of us will ever earn in our careers.
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Uk
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There’s never been an unity in this game - if you get moral scruples and sit at home, thousands will queue up for your place. Even at half pay it’s better than working outside the flightdeck
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: on a beach
Age: 68
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Europe
Posts: 704
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If we assume the wildly pessimistic scenario of pilots starting to get paid as much as cashiers in McDonald's, we'll get where the USA used to be not too long ago. A bona fide shortage of pilots for any but the top-notch carriers. In conjunction with the artificial shortage created by the 1500-hour rule, it genuinely grounded some regionals for lack of crews. Hence, good packages started being offered, far superior to those in Europe.
You can't be doing P2F from line training till command upgrade. Neither can you survive for years on 18K, however strong your passion is. A job is a job, you count on it to make a living. Anyone in their right mind can only survive for that long sleeping in the car and eating canned beans three times a day. This, if it happens, will lead to flying becoming far less attractive and far less likely to be a lifelong career of choice rather than a few-year "I-tried-flying-a-jet-for-real" affair. And things will self-adjust.
Although I'm in the moderately optimistic lot foreseeing a reasonably good future for the profession, I cannot deny that things will get ugly for anywhere between 1 and 3 years from now. But afterwards, demand will be back and higher than in 2019 and many existing crews will have retired. So, who will be needed to get those planes flying? Hint: not only the 200-hour guys, you can't run any airline on cadets only.
You can't be doing P2F from line training till command upgrade. Neither can you survive for years on 18K, however strong your passion is. A job is a job, you count on it to make a living. Anyone in their right mind can only survive for that long sleeping in the car and eating canned beans three times a day. This, if it happens, will lead to flying becoming far less attractive and far less likely to be a lifelong career of choice rather than a few-year "I-tried-flying-a-jet-for-real" affair. And things will self-adjust.
Although I'm in the moderately optimistic lot foreseeing a reasonably good future for the profession, I cannot deny that things will get ugly for anywhere between 1 and 3 years from now. But afterwards, demand will be back and higher than in 2019 and many existing crews will have retired. So, who will be needed to get those planes flying? Hint: not only the 200-hour guys, you can't run any airline on cadets only.
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Grrrr
Age: 17
Posts: 674
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I will advise against listening to any of the obvious management trolls who fester on this thread. It is in their interest to paint a picture of the sky falling,so that it will be easier to lower terms and conditions. It is the classic “never let a good crisis go to waste “ ploy.
I really don’t think you need to be a “management troll” to predict that the results of this pandemic will have a devastating effect on the industry. Just read the papers or watch the news, apart from the “our plan is working” UK government daily briefing. For the UK alone there are predictions of the UK economy suffering it’s worst recession in peace time, housing market crashing and 3.5 million people unemployed who won’t be spending money on going on holiday. Let’s say though that it’s not that bad, and is only as bad as the mini recession of the early 1990s. That lasted for four years, and I remember ex airline pilots with 10,000 hours sitting in the right seat of Navajos for no pay, just to get a bit of flying on empty sectors, and people coming out of Oxford in 1991 and taking six years to find a job. Add to that the unemployed pilots from Airlines around the UK and expats coming back from all over the world and sadly I can’t really share the optimism. Let’s just hope I’m wrong.
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 262
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think that a big problem is that the likes of ReallyAnnoyed have been stuck at home too long without seeing the real world out there. Not at all their fault, but it does limit their viewpoint.
To see airport after airport after airport full of parked up and sealed aeroplanes (I'm not talking about remote 'storage' airports, I'm talking about normal 'every day' airports), to see totally deserted airport terminals and to see the Departure Board in the terminal of one of the world's major international airports on what should be a hectic bank holiday with only five flights on it -- things are bad. Trying to bang on about maintaining Ts&Cs just does not fit into that real world out there. Taking whatever is needed to keep as many pilots in employment and avoid them having to worry about "Working Life After Flying" is most important right now.
Please do NOT try to confuse this situation with any other. It is totally unlike any other. I will repeat the graph from 'Flight' that I posted some time back:
Not a single situation that anyone has tried to compare with in the past comes anywhere near this.
excrab has it perfectly correct:
Best right now is to try to look after each other and ensure that as many pilots stay in work for as long as possible...
To see airport after airport after airport full of parked up and sealed aeroplanes (I'm not talking about remote 'storage' airports, I'm talking about normal 'every day' airports), to see totally deserted airport terminals and to see the Departure Board in the terminal of one of the world's major international airports on what should be a hectic bank holiday with only five flights on it -- things are bad. Trying to bang on about maintaining Ts&Cs just does not fit into that real world out there. Taking whatever is needed to keep as many pilots in employment and avoid them having to worry about "Working Life After Flying" is most important right now.
Please do NOT try to confuse this situation with any other. It is totally unlike any other. I will repeat the graph from 'Flight' that I posted some time back:
Not a single situation that anyone has tried to compare with in the past comes anywhere near this.
excrab has it perfectly correct:
The time to try to improve terms and conditions is when you have a position to bargain from.
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: uk
Posts: 913
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
All three lines above are correct, but, the current dire situation plus excrabs attitude (which is commonly shared by pilots) means that the third statement is paid lip service to only. Talk is cheap, decent Union representation is scarce and the next gen of pilots will be having the same conversations when the next big event occurs. Pilots have allowed themselves to become a cheap commodity and the only trajectory is down.
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Europe
Posts: 704
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Did the generation that tends to moan about the downward curve the most do anything when self-funded type ratings became a big thing? Nothing. Did they do much to stop P2F? Not really. Bogus self-employment contracts for the new entrants? Let them be! Because why bother when it's only a concern to the youngsters? And that was the case right until it crept upon everyone, young and old.
Nobody other than you can (or will) defend your own interests. Forget about anyone campaigning to make your life any better, nobody will bother and nobody will take the associated risks. Even in the best of times, everyone's priority is their own welfare. Also, nobody other than you can judge what's in your best interests right now. For someone, not working for 2 years in hopes of returning to the same package as in January afterwards might be the way to go. For many, it's not. Those many simply can't survive those 2 years without work - and their alternatives on the ground will not bring them any sizable fraction of the reduced package.
Some might call it trolling or whatever. I really, really wish it was... As much as we try to deny it, that's the reality of life.
Nobody other than you can (or will) defend your own interests. Forget about anyone campaigning to make your life any better, nobody will bother and nobody will take the associated risks. Even in the best of times, everyone's priority is their own welfare. Also, nobody other than you can judge what's in your best interests right now. For someone, not working for 2 years in hopes of returning to the same package as in January afterwards might be the way to go. For many, it's not. Those many simply can't survive those 2 years without work - and their alternatives on the ground will not bring them any sizable fraction of the reduced package.
Some might call it trolling or whatever. I really, really wish it was... As much as we try to deny it, that's the reality of life.
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Europe
Posts: 704
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Nothing wrong with that - and it's absolutely understandable in the light of how many carriers treated their personnel in the past months. As long as you are happy with your choice, it's all well and good. And you certainly won't be alone as in the past weeks many colleagues have made a similar choice simply because of being totally demoralised by the obnoxious treatment they received.
Best of luck in your new career!
Best of luck in your new career!
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Planet no. 3
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm reaching similar conclusions. Doing this fulltime in a low cost company now at reduced salary, what's the point? I'm just hoping they won't be able to max us out for a few years because of this virus.
It's an utter absurdity how on the one hand you'll have thousands of unemployed pilots doing nothing and on the other hand a layer of us "lucky ones" who can be exploited even more, on random rosters doing close to 900 hours a year.
It's an utter absurdity how on the one hand you'll have thousands of unemployed pilots doing nothing and on the other hand a layer of us "lucky ones" who can be exploited even more, on random rosters doing close to 900 hours a year.
Indeed.
Most airlines would obviously rather not hire two people on part time due to training overheads but those of us who genuinely benefit from such arrangements, and I know this will be controversial, would gladly cover those costs. I know many will wheep at hearing this and it is a slippery road (possibly, unless enshrined in union agreement) but for me at least, it's more important I'm regularly practicing my other trade than it is to lose a couple of grand on training expenses.
Incoming!
Most airlines would obviously rather not hire two people on part time due to training overheads but those of us who genuinely benefit from such arrangements, and I know this will be controversial, would gladly cover those costs. I know many will wheep at hearing this and it is a slippery road (possibly, unless enshrined in union agreement) but for me at least, it's more important I'm regularly practicing my other trade than it is to lose a couple of grand on training expenses.
Incoming!
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Uk
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
TBH,
the chances of doing this again , full time, part time or at all are fairly slim.
The competition for any posts worldwide will be enormous , and not only that, so will competition for jobs across all other sectors including McJobs.
I awake everyday to a desolate wasteland !
the chances of doing this again , full time, part time or at all are fairly slim.
The competition for any posts worldwide will be enormous , and not only that, so will competition for jobs across all other sectors including McJobs.
I awake everyday to a desolate wasteland !
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Planet no. 3
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The race to the bottom is reaching a point where safety will become compromised. Aviation remains very safe statistically but the bean counters are playing with fire and morale is at rock-bottom.
The technology and infrastructure are simply not there to easily replace us. So you may end up with a situation in the next few decades where aviation becomes less safe, with button pushers on low wages with no actual airmanship or exposure to "real flying", and you can only rely on technology for so much.
The technology and infrastructure are simply not there to easily replace us. So you may end up with a situation in the next few decades where aviation becomes less safe, with button pushers on low wages with no actual airmanship or exposure to "real flying", and you can only rely on technology for so much.
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Europe
Posts: 704
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That's the thing, there's a day after today and a day after tomorrow. Right now, there's a shortage of ANY good jobs in ANY industry. Even IT guys who were first thought to be recession-proof are being made redundant en masse.
But what do we do when things pick up? Skilled personnel will be needed again. And in large numbers. In the context of aviation, even if we assume that recovery to 2019 levels and further growth will not happen until 2024, there will still be a lot of retirements in that period, hence a need for someone to replace those people. Not to mention that some pilots who are still far from retirement age are walking away voluntarily - and someone will have to replace them as well. There might be loads of wannabes out there, but you can't run an airline on 200-hour cadets only.
But what do we do when things pick up? Skilled personnel will be needed again. And in large numbers. In the context of aviation, even if we assume that recovery to 2019 levels and further growth will not happen until 2024, there will still be a lot of retirements in that period, hence a need for someone to replace those people. Not to mention that some pilots who are still far from retirement age are walking away voluntarily - and someone will have to replace them as well. There might be loads of wannabes out there, but you can't run an airline on 200-hour cadets only.