EASA Duty/Flight Limitations
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: 112 Ocean Avenue, 11701
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
EASA Duty/Flight Limitations
EASA proposes the following 244 pages amendment...
http://easa.europa.eu/rulemaking/doc...%202010-14.pdf
Some "interesting" numbers at page 48 regarding the staff costs
http://easa.europa.eu/rulemaking/doc...%202010-14.pdf
Some "interesting" numbers at page 48 regarding the staff costs
Join Date: Jan 1997
Location: UK
Posts: 7,737
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There's an early March deadline for submissions to answer/rebut/modify 14 questions EASA consider remaining open for debate and change. You'll find them in the early part of the December 2010 document inked above.
With them supposedly resolved it's freeze time for final draft and then into law for April 2012 kick off.
That's the theory anyway
Rob
With them supposedly resolved it's freeze time for final draft and then into law for April 2012 kick off.
That's the theory anyway
Rob
Up until now the UK CAA have continued using CAP371 because it not only meets but exceeds Subpart Q requirements.
Does anyone know whether they are going to be able to opt out of the new requirements?
Does anyone know whether they are going to be able to opt out of the new requirements?
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 1,642
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Bean
Not this time although it's anything from a done deal. Most G reg carriers will have industrial agreements inside EASA FTL is my personal view.
The only thing i'm looking forward to is no limits on consecutive early / lates / nights and the factorisation tables on ETOPS.
Not this time although it's anything from a done deal. Most G reg carriers will have industrial agreements inside EASA FTL is my personal view.
The only thing i'm looking forward to is no limits on consecutive early / lates / nights and the factorisation tables on ETOPS.
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: European Administrative Area (Western District and Islands)
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Don't rely on it Angry, check. My own outfit are insisting on retaining reference to words to effect of "any approved ftl scheme in force under its jurisdiction" in our scheduling agreement, meaning when/if the rules change to allow for example proposals such as 40% longer days and min rest reduced to 7.5 hrs, we have to do it, and it won't cost them a penny.