Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Terms and Endearment
Reload this Page >

Ryanair: New Cadets Vs Experieneced De Fo

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Terms and Endearment The forum the bean counters hoped would never happen. Your news on pay, rostering, allowances, extras and negotiations where you work - scheduled, charter or contract.

Ryanair: New Cadets Vs Experieneced De Fo

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 29th September 2008 | 15:51
  #21 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,832
Likes: 115
From: UK
Aerospace 101:

I have never read so much crap for years. I can only assume that you have very little experience in aviation.

I have been training now for over 40 years and I love the ex-FR pilots. They can do non-precision approaches and circling approaches up the ying yang and are generally much better at hand-flying than most.

I can think of more than one flag carrier that would consider an NDB to be an emergency!
JW411 is offline  
Reply
Old 29th September 2008 | 17:24
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
From: North West
To much anti Ryanair sentiment getting the better of several posters here and thanks to those who know posting some sense.

The SSTR costs are in line with many other type rating organisation's charges.
Extra circuits are part of the deal if needed, the only recharge I have heard about is extra sims recommended by the OAA (GECAT) before the LST, even retraining in the sim for circuits after the 21 day expiry is RYR paid.
I heard that some cadet/s were sent back for more training on circuits at CAE but not sure who paid there.
Also there are some who fail the course or withdraw of their own will, like any other course.

As for onward recruitment, bring on the RYR guys any day, as their standards are high and the risk to a new employer of them not passing the course is very low.

There will be no holding pool of cadet awaiting line training as it costs RYR to put them in the sim every 21 days for recency checks if they dont fly.

So much rubbish is spouted here I wonder if any of the detractors have ever worked in an airline as flight crew or know much truth about RYR.
Too many believe rumours and repeat them until its become the de facto truth on the rumour circuit.
Of course I can think that there are many posters here who rubbish RYR because they failed to get in at selection and hold a grudge, others jump on the band wagon because their lives are so ordinary and boring that they cant think of anything better to do.

Give it a break, guys / girls let those who want to pay do so, for there will always be those who can and will do so to get that first job.
Let RYR crews fly their aircraft without unjustified twaddle being published here.
Night_fr8 is offline  
Reply
Old 1st October 2008 | 18:04
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
From: england
Base training £20k each??????????? Base training is 6 circuits for a cadet, that hardly costs FR £20k per head! I know fuel has gone up but surely this figure is incorrect, or do you mean line training costs?
BW
Bose Wave is offline  
Reply
Old 1st October 2008 | 19:41
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: north yorkshire
fr and trainees v experienced fo's

Talking from experience it pays fr not the trainees to use them on line training with training captains and then to ship them off to a brookfield contract. fr get the advantage not the trainees
flyingfunder is offline  
Reply
Old 1st October 2008 | 20:08
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 4,507
Likes: 4
From: last time I looked I was still here.
"The IAA would not allow 300 hr F/O's"

There are 150hr students starting the TQ course. It was the case that OCC;s were paid by RYR, certainly DEC's. Also, type rated or class rated pilots did not need base training. Their LT was much shorter so they were productive solo much quicker. Without full accounting facts it's difficult to know.
RAT 5 is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.