Mid and end RVR
Thread Starter

Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 118
Likes: 36
From: Somewhere
Mid and end RVR
I’m looking for the EASA regulation regarding CAT II and CAT III operations, specifically whether it requires the use of mid and end RVR or not.
From what I’ve seen, I’m not sure — if anyone has found the actual written regulation, please share it.
we’ve already discussed this a lot. I just want to see the official wording stating whether it’s required or not.
Thank you.
From what I’ve seen, I’m not sure — if anyone has found the actual written regulation, please share it.
we’ve already discussed this a lot. I just want to see the official wording stating whether it’s required or not.
Thank you.

Joined: Apr 2003
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 3,652
Likes: 492
From: Europe
https://www.easa.europa.eu/en/downloads/2019/en
https://www.easa.europa.eu/sites/def...endment_16.pdf
https://www.easa.europa.eu/en/document-library/easy-access-rules/online-publications/easy-access-rules-air-operations?page=1&kw=Planning+minima
https://www.easa.europa.eu/sites/def...endment_16.pdf
https://www.easa.europa.eu/en/document-library/easy-access-rules/online-publications/easy-access-rules-air-operations?page=1&kw=Planning+minima
Thread Starter

Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 118
Likes: 36
From: Somewhere

Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 2,605
Likes: 154
From: Having a margarita on the beach
I’m looking for the EASA regulation regarding CAT II and CAT III operations, specifically whether it requires the use of mid and end RVR or not.
From what I’ve seen, I’m not sure — if anyone has found the actual written regulation, please share it.
we’ve already discussed this a lot. I just want to see the official wording stating whether it’s required or not.
Thank you.
From what I’ve seen, I’m not sure — if anyone has found the actual written regulation, please share it.
we’ve already discussed this a lot. I just want to see the official wording stating whether it’s required or not.
Thank you.
ED Decision 2023/007/R
APPLICATION OF RVR OR VIS REPORTS — ALL AIRCRAFT
(d) If a deterioration in the RVR or VIS is reported once the aircraft is below 1 000 ft or in the FAS, as applicable, then there is no requirement for the approach to be discontinued. In this situation, the normal visual reference requirements would apply at the DA/H.
(e) Where additional RVR information is provided (e.g. midpoint and stop end), this is advisory; such information may be useful to the pilot in order to determine whether there will be sufficient visual reference to control the aircraft during roll-out and taxi. For operations where the aircraft will be controlled manually during roll-out, Table 1 in AMC1 SPA.LVO.100(a) provides an indication of the RVR that may be required to allow manual lateral control of the aircraft on the runway.
Disclaimer: always comply with your Operator regulations (OM-A) if more restrictive.
Thread Starter

Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 118
Likes: 36
From: Somewhere
GM1 NCC.OP.230 Commencement and continuation of approach
ED Decision 2023/007/R
APPLICATION OF RVR OR VIS REPORTS — ALL AIRCRAFT
(d) If a deterioration in the RVR or VIS is reported once the aircraft is below 1 000 ft or in the FAS, as applicable, then there is no requirement for the approach to be discontinued. In this situation, the normal visual reference requirements would apply at the DA/H.
(e) Where additional RVR information is provided (e.g. midpoint and stop end), this is advisory; such information may be useful to the pilot in order to determine whether there will be sufficient visual reference to control the aircraft during roll-out and taxi. For operations where the aircraft will be controlled manually during roll-out, Table 1 in AMC1 SPA.LVO.100(a) provides an indication of the RVR that may be required to allow manual lateral control of the aircraft on the runway.
Disclaimer: always comply with your Operator regulations (OM-A) if more restrictive.
ED Decision 2023/007/R
APPLICATION OF RVR OR VIS REPORTS — ALL AIRCRAFT
(d) If a deterioration in the RVR or VIS is reported once the aircraft is below 1 000 ft or in the FAS, as applicable, then there is no requirement for the approach to be discontinued. In this situation, the normal visual reference requirements would apply at the DA/H.
(e) Where additional RVR information is provided (e.g. midpoint and stop end), this is advisory; such information may be useful to the pilot in order to determine whether there will be sufficient visual reference to control the aircraft during roll-out and taxi. For operations where the aircraft will be controlled manually during roll-out, Table 1 in AMC1 SPA.LVO.100(a) provides an indication of the RVR that may be required to allow manual lateral control of the aircraft on the runway.
Disclaimer: always comply with your Operator regulations (OM-A) if more restrictive.
I saw it in GM1 CAT.OP.MPA.305 “Commencement and continuation of approach” as well as in the AMC, but I’m not quite sure, because it feels counter-intuitive — is it really true that only the TDZ needs to be considered?( Because I believe FAA and ICAO(Doc 9365) still require it.)

Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 2,605
Likes: 154
From: Having a margarita on the beach
Thank you very much.
I saw it in GM1 CAT.OP.MPA.305 “Commencement and continuation of approach” as well as in the AMC, but I’m not quite sure, because it feels counter-intuitive — is it really true that only the TDZ needs to be considered?( Because I believe FAA and ICAO(Doc 9365) still require it.)
I saw it in GM1 CAT.OP.MPA.305 “Commencement and continuation of approach” as well as in the AMC, but I’m not quite sure, because it feels counter-intuitive — is it really true that only the TDZ needs to be considered?( Because I believe FAA and ICAO(Doc 9365) still require it.)





