Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Airbus Flysmart TO Perf EO Acceleration

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Airbus Flysmart TO Perf EO Acceleration

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 3rd July 2023 | 11:42
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Aviation Qualifications: Spotter
Posts: 241
Likes: 50
From: Coast to Coast...
Airbus Flysmart TO Perf EO Acceleration

The Flysmart Takeoff performance calculated Engine Out Acceleration Altitude for most airports with no terrain considerations is 800ft AGL. What happened to the days of 1500 AGL as a rule? I keep on telling guys that this is simply a minimum and I can adjust it to a higher value (limited by TOGA time limit) if I wanted to. Seems we have a lot of monkey say, monkey do going on. I'm being asked "where is it written that you can change it?" It's common sense that you probably don't want to be accelerating at 800ft AGL out of LGW given 3 GA airfields in close proximity. Thoughts?
Smooth Airperator is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd July 2023 | 15:39
  #2 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 39
From: Wanderlust
Originally Posted by Smooth Airperator
The Flysmart Takeoff performance calculated Engine Out Acceleration Altitude for most airports with no terrain considerations is 800ft AGL. What happened to the days of 1500 AGL as a rule? I keep on telling guys that this is simply a minimum and I can adjust it to a higher value (limited by TOGA time limit) if I wanted to. Seems we have a lot of monkey say, monkey do going on. I'm being asked "where is it written that you can change it?" It's common sense that you probably don't want to be accelerating at 800ft AGL out of LGW given 3 GA airfields in close proximity. Thoughts?
Many LCCs use 800 ft THR RED/ACC ALT where possible for fuel saving. 1500/3000 was for noise abetment. So it depends on company policy.
vilas is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd July 2023 | 17:23
  #3 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 83
Likes: 2
From: Central Europe
Does Flysmart not give you the max EO accel altitude limited by 10 min OEI TOGA thrust? As long as you respect it you should be fine with a delayed leveloff/ acceleration.
FLX/MCT is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd July 2023 | 17:59
  #4 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,246
Likes: 202
From: Here and there
OP is talking about the EO ACC so fuel savings and noise abatement are irrelevant. Our EO ACC is 1500 minimum with 800 only applying to the all engines operating case.

Personally I think it best to enter the Flysmart EO ACC in the perf page. That way you have a readily accessible reminder of the minimum value. If you suffer an engine failure, there’s nothing stopping you from delaying the acceleration until you’re comfortable. There’s nothing saying you MUST level off at the EO acceleration altitude, you have to secure the engine and complete any turns anyway, but there’s also no good reason to actually change it to a higher value preemptively. Unlike the all engines operating case, the EO ACC altitude has no effect on anything in the cockpit , it doesn’t automatically increase the speed for example.
AerocatS2A is offline  
Reply
Old 4th July 2023 | 09:13
  #5 (permalink)  
50 Countries Visited
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 202
Likes: 69
From: on the edge.
From Airbus FCTM, FMGES PREPARATION:

The engine-out acceleration altitude must:
  1. Be at least 400ft above airport altitude;
  2. Ensure that the net flight path is 35ft above obstacles;
  3. Ensure that maximum time for takeoff thrust is not exceeded.

There are generally a minimum and a maximum one-engine-out altitude values.

The minimum value satisfies the first two criteria. The maximum value satisfies the last one.
Any value between those two may be retained.

The one-engine-out acceleration altitude is usually defaulted to 1500ft AGL, and may be updated as required.

Last edited by TheEdge; 4th July 2023 at 10:24.
TheEdge is offline  
Reply
Old 4th July 2023 | 12:27
  #6 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 39
From: Wanderlust
I missed out the OEI acceleration altitude which obviously is different.
vilas is offline  
Reply
Old 4th July 2023 | 15:24
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Aviation Qualifications: Spotter
Posts: 241
Likes: 50
From: Coast to Coast...
800ft out of a busy international airfield just seems wrong. Airmanship wise.
Smooth Airperator is offline  
Reply
Old 4th July 2023 | 22:18
  #8 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 543
Likes: 337
From: Blue sky
Originally Posted by Smooth Airperator
800ft out of a busy international airfield just seems wrong. Airmanship wise.
There is nothing wrong with 800ft. The problem in dence airspace is the SID that you won’t be following. From that point of, 800ft or 1500ft doesn’t make any difference, your track change is the main problem. Even worse, you’re forcing your crewmember to be non standard and you’re deviating from a ’calculated’ vertical path.

Seems more like a false sense of security. It’s not because you’ve been doing it for all this time’ all this time it was the safest option. We should learn from the past.
BraceBrace is offline  
Reply
Old 5th July 2023 | 04:09
  #9 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,246
Likes: 202
From: Here and there
Originally Posted by Smooth Airperator
800ft out of a busy international airfield just seems wrong. Airmanship wise.
"Mayday, mayday, mayday, [callsign] with an engine failure, require tracking straight ahead, climbing 4000', standby for further."
AerocatS2A is offline  
Reply
Old 5th July 2023 | 06:11
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,320
Likes: 102
From: IRS NAV ONLY
Originally Posted by Smooth Airperator
800ft out of a busy international airfield just seems wrong. Airmanship wise.
Most busy airports will at least have a good chunk of controlled airspace around them. I'd worry much more about some regional airports, where only the CTR is controlled.

FWIW, at a Boeing operator I work for, we don't have an option to select a different EO acceleration altitude, so we're stuck with what we have - default is 1000ft AAL, unless higher required to maximise payload.
FlyingStone is offline  
Reply
Old 5th July 2023 | 18:23
  #11 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 940
Likes: 57
From: Scotland
Ask your technical department or fleet technical pilot. There are a vast range of configurable options under the hood in Flysmart+ which will have been evaluated and set by your Technical Managers of which this is one.

We set it to 1000’ agl minimum.

Jwscud is offline  
Reply
Old 6th July 2023 | 06:34
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2021
Posts: 29
Likes: 3
From: Hong Kong
Originally Posted by AerocatS2A
If you suffer an engine failure, there’s nothing stopping you from delaying the acceleration until you’re comfortable. There’s nothing saying you MUST level off at the EO acceleration altitude, you have to secure the engine and complete any turns anyway
FCTM is quite clear on this: “delay the (EO) acceleration only for the purpose to secure the engine”

I don’t see the completion of a turn or being “comfortable” as a valid reason to delay EO acceleration.
Rico_Corp is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.