Final Reserve and FPF
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2007
Location: FL390
Age: 38
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Final Reserve and FPF
Hello everyone.
Final reserve is a planning figure for 30 mins required for dispatch, lets say for the A320 its around 1100kgs.
I am wondering if that should change inflight if one encounters fuel penalty failures inflight.
Lets say you lose green hydraulic fluid and after gear extension you cant retract it and you have to divert to a close airport (not your day). So you have increased fuel consumption, almost double. Leveling off you realise that you burn around 4000kg/hr.
Does the "planning" fuel value of 1100kgs for landing still applies as a threshold for fuel mayday declaration? Or you factor the fuel penalty and make that mayday call threshold at 2000kgs to adjust?
Obviously you will declare urgency or emergency in bad weather under time pressure with technical issues for other reasons and the fuel mayday may come late towards the end of the flight.
But my question is more academic. Are you obliged to adjust the final reserve fuel value for the emergency fuel declaration with increased fuel consumption?
My guess is that you should adjust and count the FPF because ATC has an estimate of your endurance from your flightplan. Declaring a fuel mayday late would compromise safety.
Have searched ICAO FPFM (9976) and Annex 6 but still nothing there.
Final reserve is a planning figure for 30 mins required for dispatch, lets say for the A320 its around 1100kgs.
I am wondering if that should change inflight if one encounters fuel penalty failures inflight.
Lets say you lose green hydraulic fluid and after gear extension you cant retract it and you have to divert to a close airport (not your day). So you have increased fuel consumption, almost double. Leveling off you realise that you burn around 4000kg/hr.
Does the "planning" fuel value of 1100kgs for landing still applies as a threshold for fuel mayday declaration? Or you factor the fuel penalty and make that mayday call threshold at 2000kgs to adjust?
Obviously you will declare urgency or emergency in bad weather under time pressure with technical issues for other reasons and the fuel mayday may come late towards the end of the flight.
But my question is more academic. Are you obliged to adjust the final reserve fuel value for the emergency fuel declaration with increased fuel consumption?
My guess is that you should adjust and count the FPF because ATC has an estimate of your endurance from your flightplan. Declaring a fuel mayday late would compromise safety.
Have searched ICAO FPFM (9976) and Annex 6 but still nothing there.
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Posts: 946
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have no reference but you definitely need to take the fuel penalty into account. The Mayday Fuel is based on remaining flight time by definition not a definite value in fuel quantity which makes sense. At anytime during flight if you believe you are going to land with less than 30 min of fuel, you must call Mayday fuel.
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: on the edge.
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Wanderlust
Posts: 3,407
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hello everyone.
Final reserve is a planning figure for 30 mins required for dispatch, lets say for the A320 its around 1100kgs.
I am wondering if that should change inflight if one encounters fuel penalty failures inflight.
Lets say you lose green hydraulic fluid and after gear extension you cant retract it and you have to divert to a close airport (not your day). So you have increased fuel consumption, almost double. Leveling off you realise that you burn around 4000kg/hr.
Does the "planning" fuel value of 1100kgs for landing still applies as a threshold for fuel mayday declaration? Or you factor the fuel penalty and make that mayday call threshold at 2000kgs to adjust?
Obviously you will declare urgency or emergency in bad weather under time pressure with technical issues for other reasons and the fuel mayday may come late towards the end of the flight.
But my question is more academic. Are you obliged to adjust the final reserve fuel value for the emergency fuel declaration with increased fuel consumption?
My guess is that you should adjust and count the FPF because ATC has an estimate of your endurance from your flightplan. Declaring a fuel mayday late would compromise safety.
Have searched ICAO FPFM (9976) and Annex 6 but still nothing there.
Final reserve is a planning figure for 30 mins required for dispatch, lets say for the A320 its around 1100kgs.
I am wondering if that should change inflight if one encounters fuel penalty failures inflight.
Lets say you lose green hydraulic fluid and after gear extension you cant retract it and you have to divert to a close airport (not your day). So you have increased fuel consumption, almost double. Leveling off you realise that you burn around 4000kg/hr.
Does the "planning" fuel value of 1100kgs for landing still applies as a threshold for fuel mayday declaration? Or you factor the fuel penalty and make that mayday call threshold at 2000kgs to adjust?
Obviously you will declare urgency or emergency in bad weather under time pressure with technical issues for other reasons and the fuel mayday may come late towards the end of the flight.
But my question is more academic. Are you obliged to adjust the final reserve fuel value for the emergency fuel declaration with increased fuel consumption?
My guess is that you should adjust and count the FPF because ATC has an estimate of your endurance from your flightplan. Declaring a fuel mayday late would compromise safety.
Have searched ICAO FPFM (9976) and Annex 6 but still nothing there.
Errm, why? Circumstances may force that upon you and as long as you have followed a reasonable decision making process, there isn’t an issue. ASR/MOR, certainly.
To answer the OP, you are in a non-normal situation, so it would be eminently sensible to reconsider your reserves (normally 30mins clean, 1500’ AAL, PLW @ALT). If you had dispatched IAW the DDG with the gear locked down, your increased fuel burn at all stages of flight would have to be accounted for in the flight plan, including the final reserve figure.
To answer the OP, you are in a non-normal situation, so it would be eminently sensible to reconsider your reserves (normally 30mins clean, 1500’ AAL, PLW @ALT). If you had dispatched IAW the DDG with the gear locked down, your increased fuel burn at all stages of flight would have to be accounted for in the flight plan, including the final reserve figure.
Only half a speed-brake
It is penalty of 180 percent which comes on top of the normal burn.
Assuming normal FRF 1250 and ALTN fuel of 1750,
3 + 3 x 1.8 = 8.4 T.
If that was for G HYD LO PR with doors hanging, there's another +15% IIRC.
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2007
Location: FL390
Age: 38
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Another fact missed often in case of the L/G down mentioned above is the penalty algorithm.
It is penalty of 180 percent which comes on top of the normal burn.
Assuming normal FRF 1250 and ALTN fuel of 1750,
3 + 3 x 1.8 = 8.4 T.
If that was for G HYD LO PR with doors hanging, there's another +15% IIRC.
It is penalty of 180 percent which comes on top of the normal burn.
Assuming normal FRF 1250 and ALTN fuel of 1750,
3 + 3 x 1.8 = 8.4 T.
If that was for G HYD LO PR with doors hanging, there's another +15% IIRC.
Real consumption is much less, close to x2.1 (ref Bomb on board QRH)
Plus, with flysmart in-flight calculation you can have more realistic consumption calculation according to your selection in the EFB (Select NSC)
After some emails between my company and airbus to clarify, airbus replied that flysmart is more accurate and approved app to calculate such computations in-flight
So thats good news
Only half a speed-brake
Haha, already have the QRH open because of the other thread. Bomb is for level flight after descent with CF 1 + L/G down, suggesting 'LO SPD'.
This brings another question, which flaps and speed profile would one choose to minimize fuel burn. It's an edge case only relevant for loss of G HYD at take-off with weather below minima (TKOF alternate).
The idea of calculating this for a MisAPCH from DES after a failure is a bit vain because you won't have 3x the fuel normally needed to ALTN, so no point of diverting.
The other combinations seem only theoretical such as diversion en route (EMERG ELEC) but G/A from the chosen airport, after which a leg to a different backup field needs to be flown.
This brings another question, which flaps and speed profile would one choose to minimize fuel burn. It's an edge case only relevant for loss of G HYD at take-off with weather below minima (TKOF alternate).
The idea of calculating this for a MisAPCH from DES after a failure is a bit vain because you won't have 3x the fuel normally needed to ALTN, so no point of diverting.
The other combinations seem only theoretical such as diversion en route (EMERG ELEC) but G/A from the chosen airport, after which a leg to a different backup field needs to be flown.
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2007
Location: FL390
Age: 38
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Haha, already have the QRH open because of the other thread. Bomb is for level flight after descent with CF 1 + L/G down, suggesting 'LO SPD'.
This brings another question, which flaps and speed profile would one choose to minimize fuel burn. It's an edge case only relevant for loss of G HYD at take-off with weather below minima (TKOF alternate).
This brings another question, which flaps and speed profile would one choose to minimize fuel burn. It's an edge case only relevant for loss of G HYD at take-off with weather below minima (TKOF alternate).
The idea of calculating this for a MisAPCH from DES after a failure is a bit vain because you won't have 3x the fuel normally needed to ALTN, so no point of diverting.
The other combinations seem only theoretical such as diversion en route (EMERG ELEC) but G/A from the chosen airport, after which a leg to a different backup field needs to be flown.
The other combinations seem only theoretical such as diversion en route (EMERG ELEC) but G/A from the chosen airport, after which a leg to a different backup field needs to be flown.
For instance, flying to a 75 track NM ALTN field without failure is 700kgs. With gear down as per QRH its around 2000kgs. Whereas, flysmart in flight for alternate (CLB-CRZ-DES) calculates 1200kgs.
Only half a speed-brake
Yes, I was too concise. The bomb 'slow' does not say how slow, just gives you 1/G as a hint. You land a the nearest available and better have fuel for that. But also can go slower, which is better and the same concept why the gear is down. 2+G and F speed is nice for structural considerations but the burnoff might be incompatible with distance to diversion field.
For the preciously discussed case, if you needed to divert after MisApch with gravity gear, what conf and speed to choose - that was my thought (at the absence of hints). Easy answer to that, clean but gear out.
The examples you give sound logical after thinking about them a bit. BTW did you had the chance to check the dispatch for gear down performance data and compare them to FlySmart with failure?
For the preciously discussed case, if you needed to divert after MisApch with gravity gear, what conf and speed to choose - that was my thought (at the absence of hints). Easy answer to that, clean but gear out.
The examples you give sound logical after thinking about them a bit. BTW did you had the chance to check the dispatch for gear down performance data and compare them to FlySmart with failure?
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2007
Location: FL390
Age: 38
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sadly airbus removed the relevant performance section. These tables are not anymore in my FCOM. But yes, I remember that they were pretty accurate.
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Having a margarita on the beach
Posts: 2,424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hi,
You are considering L/G down with doors closed correct? i.e. loss of G HYD during takeoff roll or shortly after and the inability to raise the gear.
Flysmart gives You data for LRC in terms of CAS, MAX and OPT altitude and a combination to obtain the Maximum specific range.
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Having a margarita on the beach
Posts: 2,424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hello everyone.
Final reserve is a planning figure for 30 mins required for dispatch, lets say for the A320 its around 1100kgs.
I am wondering if that should change inflight if one encounters fuel penalty failures inflight.
Lets say you lose green hydraulic fluid and after gear extension you cant retract it and you have to divert to a close airport (not your day). So you have increased fuel consumption, almost double. Leveling off you realise that you burn around 4000kg/hr.
Does the "planning" fuel value of 1100kgs for landing still applies as a threshold for fuel mayday declaration? Or you factor the fuel penalty and make that mayday call threshold at 2000kgs to adjust?
Obviously you will declare urgency or emergency in bad weather under time pressure with technical issues for other reasons and the fuel mayday may come late towards the end of the flight.
But my question is more academic. Are you obliged to adjust the final reserve fuel value for the emergency fuel declaration with increased fuel consumption?
My guess is that you should adjust and count the FPF because ATC has an estimate of your endurance from your flightplan. Declaring a fuel mayday late would compromise safety.
Have searched ICAO FPFM (9976) and Annex 6 but still nothing there.
Final reserve is a planning figure for 30 mins required for dispatch, lets say for the A320 its around 1100kgs.
I am wondering if that should change inflight if one encounters fuel penalty failures inflight.
Lets say you lose green hydraulic fluid and after gear extension you cant retract it and you have to divert to a close airport (not your day). So you have increased fuel consumption, almost double. Leveling off you realise that you burn around 4000kg/hr.
Does the "planning" fuel value of 1100kgs for landing still applies as a threshold for fuel mayday declaration? Or you factor the fuel penalty and make that mayday call threshold at 2000kgs to adjust?
Obviously you will declare urgency or emergency in bad weather under time pressure with technical issues for other reasons and the fuel mayday may come late towards the end of the flight.
But my question is more academic. Are you obliged to adjust the final reserve fuel value for the emergency fuel declaration with increased fuel consumption?
My guess is that you should adjust and count the FPF because ATC has an estimate of your endurance from your flightplan. Declaring a fuel mayday late would compromise safety.
Have searched ICAO FPFM (9976) and Annex 6 but still nothing there.
the mayday fuel is time based, hence whatever increases your fuel consumption (gear stuck down, slats/flaps and so on) will affect how much time you can be in the air with a given amount of fuel. You will need to reassess all your critical fuel scenarios such as the final reserve fuel for instance. On the A320 a single hydraulic failure is not an emergency but the inability to land with at least 30 min of fuel in your tanks (if that is the case) will become one, like in your example.
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2007
Location: FL390
Age: 38
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks all for your time.
By the way. Do anyone knows what's the company final reserve for Lufthansa? Have heard that they have adjusted it to 45mins of fuel, which I find awesome.
I was looking recently a study that occurred some years ago in their simulators about an approach in LFMN and then a nose gear would not come down with a hydraulic failure, plus on the second approach they had flaps locked.
This study after some mathematical forecasts concluded that the final reserve of 30mins was not enough to be safe according to todays high complexity on the flightdecks, and that its more applicable to the old jet era. A recommendation to adjust to 45 mins would dramatically minimize the risk of fuel starvation.
By the way. Do anyone knows what's the company final reserve for Lufthansa? Have heard that they have adjusted it to 45mins of fuel, which I find awesome.
I was looking recently a study that occurred some years ago in their simulators about an approach in LFMN and then a nose gear would not come down with a hydraulic failure, plus on the second approach they had flaps locked.
This study after some mathematical forecasts concluded that the final reserve of 30mins was not enough to be safe according to todays high complexity on the flightdecks, and that its more applicable to the old jet era. A recommendation to adjust to 45 mins would dramatically minimize the risk of fuel starvation.
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Having a margarita on the beach
Posts: 2,424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks all for your time.
By the way. Do anyone knows what's the company final reserve for Lufthansa? Have heard that they have adjusted it to 45mins of fuel, which I find awesome.
I was looking recently a study that occurred some years ago in their simulators about an approach in LFMN and then a nose gear would not come down with a hydraulic failure, plus on the second approach they had flaps locked.
This study after some mathematical forecasts concluded that the final reserve of 30mins was not enough to be safe according to todays high complexity on the flightdecks, and that its more applicable to the old jet era. A recommendation to adjust to 45 mins would dramatically minimize the risk of fuel starvation.
By the way. Do anyone knows what's the company final reserve for Lufthansa? Have heard that they have adjusted it to 45mins of fuel, which I find awesome.
I was looking recently a study that occurred some years ago in their simulators about an approach in LFMN and then a nose gear would not come down with a hydraulic failure, plus on the second approach they had flaps locked.
This study after some mathematical forecasts concluded that the final reserve of 30mins was not enough to be safe according to todays high complexity on the flightdecks, and that its more applicable to the old jet era. A recommendation to adjust to 45 mins would dramatically minimize the risk of fuel starvation.
Legally landing with 30 mins of gas in the tanks of a large category transport aircraft is not ideal but it is definitely not going to change.
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Vladivostok
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My company recently updated Flight Ops Manual and Fuel policy is 30’ of final reserve at dispatch phase, but they require to call “Minimum Fuel “ when Land ANSA would be with fuel less than for 45’…