Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

A320 multiple ADR failure

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

A320 multiple ADR failure

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 19th December 2018 | 20:51
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
From: Canada
A320 multiple ADR failure

Hello fellow bus drivers...had a discussion with my FO today about which ADR’s we would shut off in the event of uncommanded pitch down (OEB). As far as I could tell by studying our manual, we would lose the least amount (system wise) by selecting ADR 2 & 3 off. In particular terrain being associated with ADR 1.

Referencing our ABNORMALS section, it specifically mentions that ADR 1 & 3 would result in gear manual extension with no possibility of retraction. He was adamant that ADR 2 & 3 would also have this same result.

just curious if anyone else has a definitive answer to that? I’m not in the sim for another three and a half months...so I can’t go and test it for myself...
upontop325 is offline  
Reply
Old 19th December 2018 | 21:20
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
From: FL390
Nope your FO is wrong
Manual gear extension is required in 1+3

Deciding which ADR will be on is not so important initially as the task is, which is to get out of normal law and considering the PFs PFD indications

As soon as the flight path is recovered you can rethink which ones you will keep for long term use in the subsequent flight and approach
Lantirn is offline  
Reply
Old 19th December 2018 | 22:56
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
From: Canada
Thanks, that’s what I thought. I’ve always made a point of briefing that my first choice would be 2+3 unless I already knew 1 was bad,(MEL, etc,) because you’d lose terrain warnings.
upontop325 is offline  
Reply
Old 19th December 2018 | 23:31
  #4 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 374
Likes: 28
From: Country Victoria, Australia
If you had an uncommanded pitch down, wouldn't you want to get rid of the one that was actually doing the controlling at the time? It shouldn't matter what else you're going to lose, as that would be incidental compared to a pitch down.
mrdeux is offline  
Reply
Old 20th December 2018 | 00:10
  #5 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 496
Likes: 19
From: Ziltoidia... indeed'd.
1 + 2 off so you can use the switching panel to display air data information on either side, allowing both pilots to have the controls. It helps during app preparation and briefing, and also allows some sort of fatigue management as neither AP nor A/THR would be available for the reminder of the flight.

Gear extension and retraction is available whenever ADR1 or ADR3 are available, show your FO the logic diagram in the FCOM.
iggy is offline  
Reply
Old 20th December 2018 | 00:41
  #6 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
From: Canada
Airbus just says turn two off...as a previous poster mentioned...to force it into alternate law and getting rid of the protections that are driving it down in the first place. You wouldn’t necessarily know right away which one is the culprit until you had a chance to troubleshoot, which you might not have time to do when you’re pointed at terra firma.

Logic diagrams...I have access to AOM 1 and AOM 2...didn’t see any logic diagrams. I wish I had access to Airbus’ source material...but I only have access to my company manuals.

I do like the idea of 1+2 to be able to switch 3 from left to right as needed.

Thanks all for the replies...
upontop325 is offline  
Reply
Old 20th December 2018 | 01:25
  #7 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 496
Likes: 19
From: Ziltoidia... indeed'd.
iggy is offline  
Reply
Old 1st January 2019 | 21:26
  #8 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 422
Likes: 5
From: 5° above the Equator, 75° left of Greenwich
Having a look at the FCOM in Abnormal and Emergency Proc's, the status page for dual ADR failure only shows ADR 1+3 as the only combination that requires a manual gear extension (with subsequent no retraction). While I have always contemplated turning off 2 and 3 in the event of that failure popping up, I have to say I do like iggy's idea of turning 1 and 2 off so we can switch #3 to either side as required. Something to ponder about.

As a side note, turning off 1+2 apparently would leave you without "ATC/XPDR". I imagine it is only the data provided by the ADR's, not the xpdr signal as such?
Escape Path is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.