Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

easyJet Performance A..nomalies

Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

easyJet Performance A..nomalies

Old 16th Oct 2018, 15:54
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: MAN
Posts: 788
easyJet Performance A..nomalies

Evening all - I notice the press on the subject to the latest Takeoff Performance errors or anomalies at Gatwick. How are these being addressed? Congratulations to easyJet for having a safety culture that enables their Pilots openly report these issues, they could be easily covered up.


Six perfomance anomalies in 12 months?
A lot of "verbiage" in the SOPs particularly during the line up sequence that seems to add zero value

Thoughts?
Dogma is offline  
Old 16th Oct 2018, 16:47
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1,486
Unless both Pilots refer to their individual EFB T/O Performance module (which may have timed out) during the PEDS, there’s no real safety value whatsoever.
Nightstop is offline  
Old 17th Oct 2018, 07:03
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seat 0A
Posts: 7,767

PEDS

Please explain?
Capn Bloggs is offline  
Old 17th Oct 2018, 09:23
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Italy
Posts: 78
Originally Posted by Capn Bloggs View Post
Please explain?
briefing recap during taxi out:
Performance Flex/Toga and T/o intersection
Engine out Procedure Standard/non standard
Departure sid written in the clearance vs sid written on ...............the MCDU FPL page
Stop Climb
I-WEBA is offline  
Old 17th Oct 2018, 09:59
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seat 0A
Posts: 7,767
Thanks Weba.
Capn Bloggs is offline  
Old 17th Oct 2018, 14:25
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: between supple thighs
Posts: 235
EASA has released an SIB regarding possible issues with Flysmart and changes of intersection departures.
sleeve of wizard is offline  
Old 17th Oct 2018, 16:31
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 1,468
Originally Posted by sleeve of wizard View Post
EASA has released an SIB regarding possible issues with Flysmart and changes of intersection departures.
Thatís not relevant as itís only for the iPad version of Flysmart which easy donít use
EGPFlyer is online now  
Old 17th Oct 2018, 18:48
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Up north
Posts: 1,607
Haven't seen this, what were the anomalies? FlySmart producing different perf numbers or user / input related issues?

CP
CaptainProp is offline  
Old 17th Oct 2018, 20:59
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: United States
Posts: 985
Flysmart is a bug riddled disgrace . if you want any evidence of the utter ineptitude of the regulator , look no further than Flysmart .

I wonder how many of the easyJet incidences included One Engine Taxi Departure procedures ?
Nil further is offline  
Old 18th Oct 2018, 00:00
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: LGW
Posts: 842
easyJet does up to 1800flight a day ...

Thus is the exposure of risk.
a350pilots is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2018, 08:11
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: somehere sandy!
Posts: 264
Originally Posted by CaptainProp View Post
Haven't seen this, what were the anomalies? FlySmart producing different perf numbers or user / input related issues?

CP
Only an issue with selecting an intersection on the graphical interface rather than the runway drop-down menu.
Has been rectified by update in last few days,

Be interesting to know if the issue was discovered 'the hard way'!
goeasy is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2018, 13:22
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: United States
Posts: 985
Go easy

that may be the case for the latest crop (I donít know) but easy have had a fair few where it was nothing to do with the menus graphical or otherwise.

inexoerienced crews rushing about , trying to make OTP whilst starting engines during taxi at the worlds busiest single runway airport

what could possibly got wrong ..............
Nil further is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2018, 14:52
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: In the flightdeck
Age: 45
Posts: 760
Originally Posted by Nil further View Post
Go easy

that may be the case for the latest crop (I don’t know) but easy have had a fair few where it was nothing to do with the menus graphical or otherwise.

inexoerienced crews rushing about , trying to make OTP whilst starting engines during taxi at the worlds busiest single runway airport

what could possibly got wrong ..............
The worlds busiest single rwy airport often keep you in the queue for 20 min before line-up. Hardly a stressfull place to start 2nd engine while you sit and do nothing anyway.

Besides, starting that second engine consist of pressing 2 buttons, turn a knob and moving a switch. It takes 5 seconds before your hands are free again. I have never heard of a single Ezy crew member finding it stressfull to start a engine, sorry.
Cmon-PullUP is offline  
Old 20th Oct 2018, 13:00
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: United States
Posts: 985
No mention of stress in my post ,my concern is Situational Awareness , starting an engine during taxi reduces my situational awareness and overall capacity when i need it most , i.e. about to check the Perf figures and launch in to the sky .

I have watched with my own eyes , multiple cock ups during OETD affecting Perf , holding points and taxi clearances due to the amount of sh1t that is occurring during taxi .
As one with a modicum of experience i always found taxi out an essential time to get ones ducks in a row after the carnage that is a 25min turn and trap those errors that do occur from time to time .

No stress here my friend. Can you tell me how many of the above perf incidents involved OETD procedure ?

Ad separatim Have a read at the AAIB BFS Ezy intersection departure and tell me honestly that the culture of rush had nothing to do with that shocker ?
Nil further is offline  
Old 20th Oct 2018, 17:20
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: N5109.2W10.5
Posts: 611
Have a read at the AAIB BFS Ezy intersection departure and tell me honestly that the culture of rush had nothing to do with that shocker ?
I have read the report at https://reports.aviation-safety.net/...319_G-EZAA.pdf and can't see any signs of rush or single engine taxi distraction.

The performance calculation was reviewed on stand before engine start and they had so much time they bothered to change a wet V1 to a dry V1. An anomoly ‘this behaviour is encountered when using a touchscreen which software is not optimized, i.e. pre-L6 software for windows touchscreens.’ (Page 43) caused the runway in use and intersection (RW25 intersection B) to default to the full length of a runway with the lowest number (RW 07 in this case). (Caused by an unintentional swipe on the screen near runway choice). The Flysmart software then produced performance figures for full length RW 07.

The crew failed to suspect the figures were in error despite the large changes in V1, VR and V2 (page 38) and large thrust reduction from TOGA to Flex 67įC.
That size change would have flagged alarm bells for me.

Last edited by Goldenrivett; 21st Oct 2018 at 17:40. Reason: typo
Goldenrivett is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us Archive Advertising Cookie Policy Privacy Statement Terms of Service

Copyright © 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.