Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

A321 Pitch and power with N1

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

A321 Pitch and power with N1

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 23rd April 2016 | 04:37
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
From: Birmingham
A321 Pitch and power with N1

Hello guys,

I feel uncomfortable with the epr indication on the 321. Any nice hints concerning power setting with the n1 indication? Any rule of thumb?

Thanks!

SW
Speedwinner is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd April 2016 | 05:25
  #2 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 609
Likes: 1
From: Around the world.
Hi,

Just have a look at your unreliable airspeed QRH tables, it will give you some N1 pitch and power.

To be honest tooling the thing around I don't look at the EPR gauges much at all because I find them of little help, the speed trend arrow is much more help for finessed flying.
tom775257 is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd April 2016 | 20:53
  #3 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 1999
Posts: 991
Likes: 128
From: big green wheely bin
What's wrong with EPR?
Jonty is offline  
Reply
Old 24th April 2016 | 14:59
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
From: Porirua
Speedwinner
Im not taking the piss here,but what is there to be "uncomfortable"about.We fly these aircraft by the" numbers".Performance,and those numbers attached to it are just that.The rule of thumb is to correlate the current conditions,aircraft,weather,etc that give you the numbers,that essentially give you an EPR,plus others,how is that uncomfortable???.If I've missed the point here apologies in advance ,But,Fly the numbers,period
The Egt,for me is a great indication on how tired that engine is.With the old A1 engines an over temp ,in certain conditions was as a given,exceeding any parameter of any of those indications,whether it be a CFM or IAE, is just that,and you take the nessacery actions.I have never felt uncomfortable with the EPR unless I've exceeded its limitations
The second post by Tom,is exactly the place to look,because mate,I had an "actual"not the sim,and they work bloody well

Last edited by Pakehaboy; 24th April 2016 at 15:24.
Pakehaboy is offline  
Reply
Old 25th April 2016 | 00:23
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
From: Frankfurt
i think it's 1.0(GW) that i start with, then during approach I adjust around that.
on the N1 gauge you can use (GW)% and adjust

Question> anyone flying by fuel flow these days?
EDDT is offline  
Reply
Old 26th April 2016 | 19:02
  #6 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 39
From: Wanderlust
The problem with EPR is all pitch and thrust tables give N1 and the doughnut is on the EPR. So you cannot position the doughnut to the correct value. You need to push the thrust lever approximately and wait for the actual N1 to register. Off course with trend arrow it is not a problem.
vilas is offline  
Reply
Old 30th April 2016 | 16:06
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,205
Likes: 0
From: US
When? In cruise? Check the N1's and you'll have a good reference for an unreliable airspeed event.


On final for power? With auto thrust off(please do!!)? F3 is typically about 5% less N1 vs F Full. Obvious it changes with winds and a/c weight. Try about 50% N1 for F3 and adjust as necessary(it's called pilotage). Or start with 55% N1 for Full flaps and adjust as necessary. Play the constant mind game - why did the speed change? Updraft? Downdraft? Wind change? Is yes how much should I adjust my new target/base line N1? If there were no changes and the speed is decreasing or increasing the initial baseline/target N1 needs to be adjusted. This is what makes flying a skill, and fun!
misd-agin is offline  
Reply
Old 30th April 2016 | 16:08
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,205
Likes: 0
From: US
Recent 321 approach had four power settings from about 1200' to touchdown - 42% slowing, 48% target, 52% (48% was slightly low and wind changed from crosswind to headwind), then 49%. Speed within a 5 kt range the entire time.


Autothrust would have made continuous changes. Ugh.
misd-agin is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.