Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

TCAS and one-engine out operation

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

TCAS and one-engine out operation

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7th March 2016 | 11:27
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 480
Likes: 27
From: at the edge of the alps
TCAS and one-engine out operation

Most of the aircraft I flew so far, required TCAS to be set to TA ONLY in case of single-engine operation. There seem to be A/C, however, on which the TCAS will automatically disable CLIMB RAs in case of an engine-out condition.

Would appreciate any inputs on which aircraft have such a feature, and what it depends on whether aircraft have it or not. I have a faint suspicion that earlier TCAS software versions simply did not have the feature and aircraft manufactureres never bothered to implement/certify it once it was available.

Thanks for any vectors.
Alpine Flyer is offline  
Reply
Old 8th March 2016 | 00:28
  #2 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 435
Likes: 30
From: UK
I don't know of any aircraft that have an automatic inhibit of Climb in the event of an engine failure but if you think about it logically, if you are at lower levels and have a climb capability on one engine, why stay in TA only? Worse case scenario would be meeting another aircraft coming the other way also in TA only then no-one moves and a collision is assured.
Fly3 is offline  
Reply
Old 8th March 2016 | 01:03
  #3 (permalink)  
Community Builder
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 3,985
Likes: 568
From: Where the Quaboag River flows, USA
That's not how it works. If you are operating OEI, the TCAS on the intruder will issue an RA, while you do not "cooperate" in the maneuver. If the intruder flies the RA and do nothing, no collision.

GF
galaxy flyer is offline  
Reply
Old 9th March 2016 | 00:30
  #4 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 435
Likes: 30
From: UK
Unlikely I know but what happens if he is also single engine in TA only?
Fly3 is offline  
Reply
Old 9th March 2016 | 07:38
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 9,226
Likes: 996
From: Seat 1A
Don't drive home, Fly3, coz your number's up!
Capn Bloggs is offline  
Reply
Old 9th March 2016 | 08:03
  #6 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 417
Likes: 20
From: D(Emona)
That is even less probable than having two engines, destined to fail, incidentally mounted on your plane.
Dufo is offline  
Reply
Old 10th March 2016 | 08:07
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 4,835
Likes: 85
From: Boldly going where no split infinitive has gone before..
Unlikely I know but what happens if he is also single engine in TA only?
Or, not at all unlikely, the TA is the result of traffic only squawking mode "A"

Boeing QRH procedure for TCAS TA-

-Look for traffic using traffic display as a guide. Call out any conflicting traffic

- If traffic is sighted, maneuver if needed.
Wizofoz is offline  
Reply
Old 10th March 2016 | 21:56
  #8 (permalink)  

Only half a speed-brake
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 4,459
Likes: 136
From: Commuting not home
I had an disturbing experience in a SIM once.

On a typical, mandatory, and well rehearsed TCAS RA item, we had been climbing against a generated target. TA was issued, we acquired the intruder visually, called ATC and did not manoeuvre based on TA, waiting for the RA.

Which never came. SIM glitch. As we pushed the nose down, clearing the traffic with about 1/3 the desired TCAS miss distance, all three of us shuddered.
FlightDetent is offline  
Reply
Old 13th March 2016 | 03:29
  #9 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 267
Likes: 35
From: The Hot zone
"If traffic is sighted, maneuver if needed" and in the old school way of avoiding a collision it means turning to the right in any aviation jurisdiction. Pretty sure that rule has not changed. If a threat is imminent don't climb or descend, follow rules of the air and turn. Of course if you are IMC all bets are off.
Maisk Rotum is offline  
Reply
Old 13th March 2016 | 15:52
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 4,507
Likes: 4
From: last time I looked I was still here.
That's not how it works. If you are operating OEI, the TCAS on the intruder will issue an RA, while you do not "cooperate" in the maneuver. If the intruder flies the RA and do nothing, no collision.

To my understanding that will only be the case AFTER you have selected TA Only.

If I am correct I have always thought it an unnecessary delay in the Engine Failure QRH that TA Only is No. 9 in actions. Any time you have a wounded bird I want to tell all over a/c around me that I can not necessarily respond to an RA. Some QRH's have TA Only much earlier. Why the delay with an engine shutdown? It takes 1 second.
RAT 5 is offline  
Reply
Old 15th March 2016 | 14:56
  #11 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 435
Likes: 30
From: UK
To play Devil's Advocate for a second, if you have power and/or speed in hand after the engine failure because for, example, you are at light weighs or lower levels, why not reselect TA/RA for the protection it provides?
Fly3 is offline  
Reply
Old 15th March 2016 | 22:16
  #12 (permalink)  

Only half a speed-brake
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 4,459
Likes: 136
From: Commuting not home
Sound idea technically, especially against non-TCAS equipped intruders (only mode C/S).

In practical terms, it is too complicated to train in an airline environment. I foresee some liability issues too, unfortunately.

Last edited by FlightDetent; 17th March 2016 at 00:46.
FlightDetent is offline  
Reply
Old 15th March 2016 | 22:38
  #13 (permalink)  
Community Builder
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 3,985
Likes: 568
From: Where the Quaboag River flows, USA
Fly3,

You're NOT getting any "extra protection", the intruder will follow an RA and the miss distance will be as designed. The intruder is doing all the maneuvering without requiring the OEI plane to do anything.

GF

Last edited by galaxy flyer; 17th March 2016 at 01:58.
galaxy flyer is offline  
Reply
Old 17th March 2016 | 10:37
  #14 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 435
Likes: 30
From: UK
galaxy.
You are assuming that the other aircraft has TA/RA on. They might not.
Fly3 is offline  
Reply
Old 17th March 2016 | 22:06
  #15 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 761
Likes: 22
From: England
Guys
It is worth reading the Eurocontrol ACAS Bulletins. There are 19 of them now and you will find them here http://www.eurocontrol.int/publications?title=&field_term_publication_type_tid=233&year[value][year]=
Very good information.

MM
Miles Magister is offline  
Reply
Old 17th March 2016 | 22:30
  #16 (permalink)  
Community Builder
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 3,985
Likes: 568
From: Where the Quaboag River flows, USA
Fly3,

Correct, do you have the odds of two OEI TCAS-equipped planes flying a collision course? Vanishingly small, I'd submit.

GF
galaxy flyer is offline  
Reply
Old 18th March 2016 | 04:11
  #17 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 435
Likes: 30
From: UK
Yea. Murphy's Law applies though.
Fly3 is offline  
Reply
Old 18th March 2016 | 09:05
  #18 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 423
Likes: 1
From: Malvern, UK
Yea. Murphy's Law applies though.
So the scenario is...

- Two aircraft, each suffering one engine out, are on a collision course.

- ATC is completely asleep to the situation (after all, two aircraft emergencies in the sector at the same time is pretty mundane)

- The one that has RA to climb cannot. The one that has RA to descend has no RA capability.

Rather than cursing the TCAS designers for their lack of foresight I suggest you just accept that this really is not your day!
Dont Hang Up is offline  
Reply
Old 18th March 2016 | 12:50
  #19 (permalink)  

Only half a speed-brake
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 4,459
Likes: 136
From: Commuting not home
Originally Posted by Dont Hang Up
So the scenario is...
- two aircraft on a collison course
- one with engine out, tcas equipped and non-MEL
- other with XPDR with altitude reporting but no TCAS
- ATC not available for resolution
- see-and avoid not available
- too close to avoid through DESCEND RA
- crew trained not to stall after OEI RA (or recover)
FlightDetent is offline  
Reply
Old 18th March 2016 | 17:32
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 4,507
Likes: 4
From: last time I looked I was still here.
Last words heard: "I knew I should have called in sick."
RAT 5 is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.