Hand flying a 737 flight simulator
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,186
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hand flying a 737 flight simulator
When I first flew a real 737-200 in 1977 the Boeing instructor pilot told me that it could be flown with just two fingers holding the control wheel. In retrospect, he probably wasn't far wrong. But I don't recall ever having later problems using one hand to fly the 737 Classic series. But that was over 35 years ago and memories are not always reliable. This recent extract below from a You Tube movie about flying a Super Constellation seems to also back up the comment (or is it a myth) that even hand flying a 747 or MD-11 can be done with a light grip with two fingers in normal flight.
“We have a little bit of hydraulic helping us, but it needs a little force to handle it,” says Frei, who is operations director of the “Super Connie’s” Basle-based operator, the Super Constellation Flyers Association. “It’s not flying like a Boeing MD-11 or 747 with just two fingers"
I haven't flown a real 737 for over 20 years but I recently did a one hour session in a Level D (full flight) B737-300 simulator with most of it hand flying raw data. Flying with the left hand on the control wheel and right hand on the thrust levers, I found it quite heavy on the ailerons and at times during practice steep turns of 45 degrees angle of bank I needed both hands on the control wheel due to the stick forces involved. Even on instrument approaches the forces to actuate the control wheel in roll and pitch were heavier than I remembered from the -200 or 737 Classic old days. This was especially with trim changes occurring with flap configuration and thrust lever adjustment during manual flying of an ILS or VOR approach.
There was no way in the world that this particular simulator could be flown with just a two fingered technique. On the other hand maybe no 737 simulator can be flown with just two fingers. This leads me to believe if the "just two fingers" spiel was nothing more than an exaggeration used by instructors to accent the need not to over-control. Mind you, it could be that one's hand strength gets a bit weaker with advancing years
Like all Level D full flight simulators, this particular machine undergoes regular scheduled fidelity checks with a current 737 Classic pilot "flying" it. There have been no comments with regards to its fidelity and presumably that includes stick forces in normal manual flight. Is the 737 Classic any heavier in the rolling plane than (say) a 737 NG? Comments invited.
“We have a little bit of hydraulic helping us, but it needs a little force to handle it,” says Frei, who is operations director of the “Super Connie’s” Basle-based operator, the Super Constellation Flyers Association. “It’s not flying like a Boeing MD-11 or 747 with just two fingers"
I haven't flown a real 737 for over 20 years but I recently did a one hour session in a Level D (full flight) B737-300 simulator with most of it hand flying raw data. Flying with the left hand on the control wheel and right hand on the thrust levers, I found it quite heavy on the ailerons and at times during practice steep turns of 45 degrees angle of bank I needed both hands on the control wheel due to the stick forces involved. Even on instrument approaches the forces to actuate the control wheel in roll and pitch were heavier than I remembered from the -200 or 737 Classic old days. This was especially with trim changes occurring with flap configuration and thrust lever adjustment during manual flying of an ILS or VOR approach.
There was no way in the world that this particular simulator could be flown with just a two fingered technique. On the other hand maybe no 737 simulator can be flown with just two fingers. This leads me to believe if the "just two fingers" spiel was nothing more than an exaggeration used by instructors to accent the need not to over-control. Mind you, it could be that one's hand strength gets a bit weaker with advancing years
Like all Level D full flight simulators, this particular machine undergoes regular scheduled fidelity checks with a current 737 Classic pilot "flying" it. There have been no comments with regards to its fidelity and presumably that includes stick forces in normal manual flight. Is the 737 Classic any heavier in the rolling plane than (say) a 737 NG? Comments invited.
Last edited by Tee Emm; 16th Aug 2014 at 10:40.
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: East of West and North of South
Posts: 549
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If the aircraft (737 300-900) is in trim and only minor changes are needed (like say in cruise), you can fly the aircraft with one finger.
If you are making major changes to flightpath/thrust settings/configuration you need a firm grip. Basically anything which causes the aircraft no longer to be trimmed for the current conditions...
...like you experienced with the steep turns - obviously the aircraft was not in trim to continuously do a steep turn without control column input. If you had trimmed it out for the condition (which we normally wouldn't do during a turn), you could have continued the turn with a light 2 finger grip as well.
By the way a Classic is a 737 300-500. A 200 would be referred to as an "Original" or colloquially as "Jurassic", now a days.
Edit: Was a typo Denti, hereby corrected.
If you are making major changes to flightpath/thrust settings/configuration you need a firm grip. Basically anything which causes the aircraft no longer to be trimmed for the current conditions...
...like you experienced with the steep turns - obviously the aircraft was not in trim to continuously do a steep turn without control column input. If you had trimmed it out for the condition (which we normally wouldn't do during a turn), you could have continued the turn with a light 2 finger grip as well.
By the way a Classic is a 737 300-500. A 200 would be referred to as an "Original" or colloquially as "Jurassic", now a days.
Edit: Was a typo Denti, hereby corrected.
Last edited by cosmo kramer; 18th Aug 2014 at 02:04.
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: I wouldn't know.
Posts: 4,498
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Actually, the -600 is the NG version of the -500, so the classic is -300 to -500. The -600 never really caught on, same as the A318. It was around five to six tons heavier for around 115 passengers than the -500, which is a lot of extra weight per passenger. I know SAS is still flying a few ones, dunno who else.
I have been type-rated on 5 different transport category types where we trained on full-flight simulators (of various levels). In every case, the airplane has been easier to fly than the simulator. Now the DC-8 was not a 2 finger airplane...
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Southeast USA
Posts: 801
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
For whatever it is worth, the following is quoted directly out of the regulatory requirements for flight control tests for airplane flight simulators.
It should be apparent to anyone that these tests, when competently completed satisfactorily, should verify that the control “feel” in the simulator should be VERY much like that in the airplane.
It should be apparent to anyone that these tests, when competently completed satisfactorily, should verify that the control “feel” in the simulator should be VERY much like that in the airplane.
Static Control Tests:
Conducted in Ground Conditions
There are objectively measured tests for controls in all simulators. For example, the Roll Controller Position vs. Force and Surface Position Calibration test repeats what was actually conducted on an operational airplane. The test is conducted by recording the results of the aileron position and the spoiler angle while the cockpit roll controller (the wheel or side stick) is moved throughout an uninterrupted control sweep, meaning that the control (wheel or stick) is moved from neutral position to either the full left or full right position to the stop, and then reversed to the other stop, and finally back to the center position. Throughout the control displacement from minimum to maximum aileron/spoiler displacement in both directions, the position of the control wheel/side stick and both left and right aileron and associated spoiler positions are recorded, as is the pressure necessary to move the control wheel/side stick. The comparisons are to be exact to within the following limitations: ±2 lb (pounds) or 0.9 daN (deca-Neutons) for the breakout force (the force required to initiate movement); and then throughout the recording, ±10% or ±3 lb (1.3 daN) force, ±2° aileron, ±3° spoiler angle. These test are then spot-checked against in-flight data from tests such as, as engine out trims, or steady state sideslips.
These values are applicable to all 4 levels of airplane flight simulator, Levels, A, B, C, and D.
Dynamic Control Tests
Conducted in Takeoff, Cruise, and Landing conditions.
For underdamped systems: ±10% of time from 90% of initial displacement (0.9 Ad) to first zero crossing, and ±10 (n+1)% (where “n” is the sequential period of a full cycle of oscillation) of period thereafter.
±10% amplitude of first overshoot, applied to all overshoots greater than 5% of initial displacement (.05 Ad), ±1 overshoot (first significant overshoot must be matched).
For overdamped systems: ±10% of time from 90% of initial displacement (0.9 Ad) to 10% of initial displacement (0.1Ad). For the alternate method see paragraph 4 of this attachment. The slow sweep is the equivalent to the static test 2.a.2. For the moderate and rapid sweeps: ±2 lb (0.9 daN) or ±10% dynamic increment above the static force.
Data must show normal control displacement in both directions. Tolerance applies against the absolute values of each period (considered independently). Normal control displacement for this test is 25% to 50% of the maximum allowable roll controller deflection for flight conditions limited by the maneuvering load envelope
These values are applicable to Level C and Level D simulators.
Conducted in Ground Conditions
There are objectively measured tests for controls in all simulators. For example, the Roll Controller Position vs. Force and Surface Position Calibration test repeats what was actually conducted on an operational airplane. The test is conducted by recording the results of the aileron position and the spoiler angle while the cockpit roll controller (the wheel or side stick) is moved throughout an uninterrupted control sweep, meaning that the control (wheel or stick) is moved from neutral position to either the full left or full right position to the stop, and then reversed to the other stop, and finally back to the center position. Throughout the control displacement from minimum to maximum aileron/spoiler displacement in both directions, the position of the control wheel/side stick and both left and right aileron and associated spoiler positions are recorded, as is the pressure necessary to move the control wheel/side stick. The comparisons are to be exact to within the following limitations: ±2 lb (pounds) or 0.9 daN (deca-Neutons) for the breakout force (the force required to initiate movement); and then throughout the recording, ±10% or ±3 lb (1.3 daN) force, ±2° aileron, ±3° spoiler angle. These test are then spot-checked against in-flight data from tests such as, as engine out trims, or steady state sideslips.
These values are applicable to all 4 levels of airplane flight simulator, Levels, A, B, C, and D.
Dynamic Control Tests
Conducted in Takeoff, Cruise, and Landing conditions.
For underdamped systems: ±10% of time from 90% of initial displacement (0.9 Ad) to first zero crossing, and ±10 (n+1)% (where “n” is the sequential period of a full cycle of oscillation) of period thereafter.
±10% amplitude of first overshoot, applied to all overshoots greater than 5% of initial displacement (.05 Ad), ±1 overshoot (first significant overshoot must be matched).
For overdamped systems: ±10% of time from 90% of initial displacement (0.9 Ad) to 10% of initial displacement (0.1Ad). For the alternate method see paragraph 4 of this attachment. The slow sweep is the equivalent to the static test 2.a.2. For the moderate and rapid sweeps: ±2 lb (0.9 daN) or ±10% dynamic increment above the static force.
Data must show normal control displacement in both directions. Tolerance applies against the absolute values of each period (considered independently). Normal control displacement for this test is 25% to 50% of the maximum allowable roll controller deflection for flight conditions limited by the maneuvering load envelope
These values are applicable to Level C and Level D simulators.
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 1,270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hi AirRabbit,
As human pilots we "feel" the delta g during turns and during any maneuver which changes the vertical speed (take off rotation, landing flare, TCAS maneuvers etc.) The delta g feed back loop is how we judge the aircraft is responding to our pitch inputs and prevents us from exceeding +2.5g (in unprotected aircraft) or uncomfortable reduced / -ve g during a rapid level off from a climb. I don't know of any simulator capable of reproducing those motion cues.
So mathematically, the sim and aircraft performance may be identical, but a human pilot will still tell you it doesn't feel the same, and he is correct.
It should be apparent to anyone that these tests, when competently completed satisfactorily, should verify that the control “feel” in the simulator should be VERY much like that in the airplane.
So mathematically, the sim and aircraft performance may be identical, but a human pilot will still tell you it doesn't feel the same, and he is correct.
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Southeast USA
Posts: 801
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by rudderrudderrat
As human pilots we "feel" the delta g during turns and during any maneuver which changes the vertical speed (take off rotation, landing flare, TCAS maneuvers etc.) The delta g feed back loop is how we judge the aircraft is responding to our pitch inputs and prevents us from exceeding +2.5g (in unprotected aircraft) or uncomfortable reduced / -ve g during a rapid level off from a climb. I don't know of any simulator capable of reproducing those motion cues.
So mathematically, the sim and aircraft performance may be identical, but a human pilot will still tell you it doesn't feel the same, and he is correct.
So mathematically, the sim and aircraft performance may be identical, but a human pilot will still tell you it doesn't feel the same, and he is correct.
Originally Posted by TeeEmm
When I first flew a real 737-200 in 1977 the Boeing instructor pilot told me that it could be flown with just two fingers holding the control wheel. In retrospect, he probably wasn't far wrong. But I don't recall ever having later problems using one hand to fly the 737 Classic series.
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: East of West and North of South
Posts: 549
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
… if an airplane is capable of being “flown” with “2-fingers,” I would presume the reference would not include a 2-g, 60-degree bank level turn while maintaining the entry airspeed, even if other, more typical control was capable of being maintained with only “2 fingers.”
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,186
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Many thanks for all your replies. They are much appreciated. As a matter of interest, the steep turn normally required as part of an instrument rating test is based upon 45 degrees angle of bank and 250 knots. 60 degrees is real Gung Ho stuff and not really relevant other than unusual attitude practice.
Opinions vary, but some pilots prefer not to use the stabiliser trim in steep turns. One reason being steep turns are usually short term manoeuvres and if back trim is used during the turn to off-load the control force, rapid forward trim as well as slight power reduction is needed when rolling back to wings level. It can get complicated especially if conducted on instruments.
Opinions vary, but some pilots prefer not to use the stabiliser trim in steep turns. One reason being steep turns are usually short term manoeuvres and if back trim is used during the turn to off-load the control force, rapid forward trim as well as slight power reduction is needed when rolling back to wings level. It can get complicated especially if conducted on instruments.
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: N1035.5W06700.1
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
T.E.
I second what cough wrote.
The original are lighter than the classics and for me much more pleasant to hand fly as well.
One thing I have noticed so far in my experience is the larger the fuselage, the heavier the feeling of the controls.
Just my two cents
I second what cough wrote.
The original are lighter than the classics and for me much more pleasant to hand fly as well.
One thing I have noticed so far in my experience is the larger the fuselage, the heavier the feeling of the controls.
Just my two cents
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Southeast USA
Posts: 801
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by TeeEmm
As a matter of interest, the steep turn normally required as part of an instrument rating test is based upon 45 degrees angle of bank and 250 knots. 60 degrees is real Gung Ho stuff and not really relevant other than unusual attitude practice.
As human pilots we "feel" the delta g during turns and during any maneuver which changes the vertical speed (take off rotation, landing flare, TCAS maneuvers etc.) The delta g feed back loop is how we judge the aircraft is responding to our pitch inputs and prevents us from exceeding +2.5g (in unprotected aircraft) or uncomfortable reduced / -ve g during a rapid level off from a climb. I don't know of any simulator capable of reproducing those motion cues. So mathematically, the sim and aircraft performance may be identical, but a human pilot will still tell you it doesn't feel the same, and he is correct.
Last edited by AirRabbit; 19th Aug 2014 at 08:48.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,186
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I was merely attempting to point out that whatever task was being flown with “2 finger control” was not likely to result in something that would take at least a 60 degree bank, level turn
Fully understood. Please keep your posts coming. They are always thoroughly informing.
Moderator
One certification side issue. Stick load/g requirements are necessary to provide pilot safeguards in respect of overstressing during manoeuvring.
Ergo, it probably is quite poor form to trim in the turn. I suggest that the trim should be appropriate to the steady state situation (climb, cruise, descent) and that pilot plus his/her morning Willie Weeties is the answer to steep turn stick load fun and games.
Ergo, it probably is quite poor form to trim in the turn. I suggest that the trim should be appropriate to the steady state situation (climb, cruise, descent) and that pilot plus his/her morning Willie Weeties is the answer to steep turn stick load fun and games.
Nemo Me Impune Lacessit
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Derbyshire, England.
Posts: 4,094
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
One thing I have noticed so far in my experience is the larger the fuselage, the heavier the feeling of the controls.
Have flown B737-200 & -300, B747-400, B757-200 and B767-300ER, honestly can't say there was a whole lot of difference! The B747 is a big, refined lady but control forces never seemed proportional to her size!
Never trimmed in steep turns, releasing the back pressure as the bank came off was, during my training sessions, the 'norm'.
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: East of West and North of South
Posts: 549
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
[rant=on]
Arrrg... Read my WHOLE posts, instead of replying out of context. The original poster asked if it is possible to fly a 737 with "two finger". The answer is yes, if the aircraft is in trim. Even if in a steep turn you can fly it with two fingers, if you trim it out... That doesn't mean it's a good idea or practice. Infact I wrote in every post "which we would not normally do".
Now... Who the hell wants for fly a steep turn with two fingers anyway? [rant=off]
Arrrg... Read my WHOLE posts, instead of replying out of context. The original poster asked if it is possible to fly a 737 with "two finger". The answer is yes, if the aircraft is in trim. Even if in a steep turn you can fly it with two fingers, if you trim it out... That doesn't mean it's a good idea or practice. Infact I wrote in every post "which we would not normally do".
Now... Who the hell wants for fly a steep turn with two fingers anyway? [rant=off]
Moderator
cosmo - we understand your view.
However, due to the educational aspect of this forum for the new chums, occasionally we need to put in some clarification to provide for their balanced reading.
However, due to the educational aspect of this forum for the new chums, occasionally we need to put in some clarification to provide for their balanced reading.