737 Stall Test
Now, that is more like it flyboy.
Like it. :-)
Like it. :-)
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: last time I looked I was still here.
Posts: 4,507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Oh, they still make airplanes that require the stall warning to be tested before flight?
You can test many things, but is it necessary? I flew for many airlines who tested these on B737's, because you could, I suspect; or was it standard Boeing? They did not test everything, but did include the FDR & over speed clackers, but not the CVR? Again I suspect these are no-go items.
I know teach for a company who have just stopped testing stall warners and overspeeds, but do test the VOR/ILS each new crew. You figure it out.
There's nowt so queer a folk, but what do other airlines have as SOP's? And why?
You can test many things, but is it necessary? I flew for many airlines who tested these on B737's, because you could, I suspect; or was it standard Boeing? They did not test everything, but did include the FDR & over speed clackers, but not the CVR? Again I suspect these are no-go items.
I know teach for a company who have just stopped testing stall warners and overspeeds, but do test the VOR/ILS each new crew. You figure it out.
There's nowt so queer a folk, but what do other airlines have as SOP's? And why?
Last edited by RAT 5; 30th Aug 2013 at 15:31.
It takes several minutes after a cold power up for the Inertial Reference Units to stabilize and align. I don't know if the 737 Stall Warning uses the IRS but it would explain the 4 minutes if it does....
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: I wouldn't know.
Posts: 4,497
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
No, it doesn't need the IRS, however the other subsystems like the Stall Management / Yaw Damper Computer need a couple minutes to run through their respective BITE tests as well.
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Between a rock and a hard place
Posts: 1,267
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I tried this the other day, cold & dark plane.. put in on GND PWR and went for the stall warning test. Seemed to work fine? They were purring like a pussycat.
Note: The stall warning test requires that AC transfer busses are powered for up to 4 minutes (my bold)
Perhaps it means a maximum of 4 min, but it could go faster?
Note: The stall warning test requires that AC transfer busses are powered for up to 4 minutes (my bold)
Perhaps it means a maximum of 4 min, but it could go faster?
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: uk
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think that Denti might be on the right track in that the SMYD computers might be involved in the 4min requirement. Anyway, I've asked a bloke wot knows about 737 wiggly amps etc to find out. I'll be back.
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: In a far better place
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
No mention on 27-32 of the Mx. Ref. Man. About a 4 minute warm up time. The manual does state if during the test, the control column shaker operates until you release the test switch, or a maximum of 20 seconds. The 20 second maximum time limit prevents damage to the control column shaker motor. The stall warning test is inhibited when the airplane is in the air.
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: last time I looked I was still here.
Posts: 4,507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
B737 QRH technical questions
Over the years I have accumulated various QRH queries, but not found a technical pilot who could answer them, nor who followed them up to Boeing. I tried Boeing direct and was shunted back to 'your technical pilot'. Is anyone here willing to have a stab at answering them? It's not a mega list, <5. It might throw up some interesting thoughts & facts. From such round table discussions Boeing have altered things in QRH.
I've flown for various companies who asked Boeing to alter some checklists to suit the airline philosophy, and they obliged. Thus there are different ways of doing the same thing. I've since had contact with another operator via sim teaching who has altered the same QRH pilot actions in a different way to my previous experience, both of which are altered from standard Boeing. I wonder how many more versions there are out there.
But that in fact is a different topic to what my initial quest is: to understand why certain actions are required in certain scenarios. Any volunteers?
I've flown for various companies who asked Boeing to alter some checklists to suit the airline philosophy, and they obliged. Thus there are different ways of doing the same thing. I've since had contact with another operator via sim teaching who has altered the same QRH pilot actions in a different way to my previous experience, both of which are altered from standard Boeing. I wonder how many more versions there are out there.
But that in fact is a different topic to what my initial quest is: to understand why certain actions are required in certain scenarios. Any volunteers?
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Ormond Beach
Age: 49
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'd volunteer, but I'm not smart enough. Well, that and I don't fly a Boeing. In my Bombardier time I've witnessed airlines perform some procedures in diametrically opposite ways all the while claiming that performing them in any manner other than their own would result in major calamities.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: 36,000'
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks Denti & 172_driver.
I did check with the technicians on the 737NG in my company. As per them it takes a few minutes for the all systems to boot up, after AC power is applied.
Also as Denti mentioned, the word is up to.
Thanks
I did check with the technicians on the 737NG in my company. As per them it takes a few minutes for the all systems to boot up, after AC power is applied.
Also as Denti mentioned, the word is up to.
Thanks
