Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Quick ques about ILS approach.

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Quick ques about ILS approach.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 23rd Dec 2011, 10:18
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Quick ques about ILS approach.

This is the simplest picture I could get:
http://www.altairva-fs.com/training/images/pt3.gif

When doing an ILS approach with this course reversal.
I will be flying at point A intercepting my localizer at course 360, then at point B which should be a certain distance from my LOC, I turn on to a HEADING of approx 315, then again on to a heading of 115 where I intercept my localizer inbound course of 180.

Is this right?
LikeABoss is offline  
Old 23rd Dec 2011, 10:30
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: GPS L INVALID
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pretty much... Except you would probably fly a radial outbound until some distance from the DME, flying the LOC backwards is somewhat unusual in that situation. Are you referring to a specific approach?

Edit: I didnt even bother checking the exact direction - in all fairness it may be prescribed by the procedure or it may be a standard PANS-OPS reversal (80/260 or 45/180, both 1:15 timing for C and D)

Last edited by STBYRUD; 23rd Dec 2011 at 11:13.
STBYRUD is online now  
Old 23rd Dec 2011, 11:07
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Zulu Time Zone
Posts: 730
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No it's not right LAB. You should be turning on to 135 not 115. I'd suggest working out reciprocals in your head until it becomes second nature. I don't wish to be blunt, but at the end of the day you will have to be on top of these basics because you can't be up there faffing around.

[sorry STBYRUD, we seem to be doing a bit of concurrent editing. Of course he should turn onto 115 if that's prescribed, but that wouldn't be the 45/180 procedure turn being described on the website he got the image from!]

Last edited by oggers; 23rd Dec 2011 at 11:23.
oggers is offline  
Old 23rd Dec 2011, 13:32
  #4 (permalink)  
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: On the Beach
Posts: 3,336
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
oggers:

No it's not right LAB. You should be turning on to 135 not 115. I'd suggest working out reciprocals in your head until it becomes second nature. I don't wish to be blunt, but at the end of the day you will have to be on top of these basics because you can't be up there faffing around.
Or, just use the procedure turn numbers on the approach chart.
aterpster is offline  
Old 23rd Dec 2011, 13:38
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: edge of reality
Posts: 792
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And always keep in mind what the wind up there (as opposed to on the ground) is likely to be doing to you ...
MungoP is offline  
Old 23rd Dec 2011, 14:49
  #6 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As above, LAB - (apart for your maths) you were quite right BUT as MungoP reminds you, those 'headings' are really 'tracks'.
BOAC is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.