Paravisual Display (PVD) 747-400
On the T7/744 you need to have the freq and LOC course hard tuned on the NAV RAD page.
I guess the logic is something like that. the display sits just at the bottom of your peripheral vision and as Pontius says it's very intuitive to use
All that said our latest T7s are being delivered without them, story goes they (well the one's we use) are expensive to maintain and in reality are rarely used in anger.
Is it simply a system that gives better peripheral and faster/quicker recognition needed because of the higher cockpits of the wide bodies resulting in greater slant ranges for seeing the runway lighting,
All that said our latest T7s are being delivered without them, story goes they (well the one's we use) are expensive to maintain and in reality are rarely used in anger.
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 1,270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hi Pontius,
I beg to differ.
During line up at taxi speed, the TriStar PVD would be steady with an intercept heading towards the centre line and then show a turn command to align with the centre line.
It was certainly more sophisticated than a simple localiser deviation display, and it considered:
airplane yaw rate
cross body acceleration
localiser deviation
localiser deviation rate.
It's not bright enough to roll right to intercept the centreline. It's not a flight director that is taking into account turn rates.....
During line up at taxi speed, the TriStar PVD would be steady with an intercept heading towards the centre line and then show a turn command to align with the centre line.
It was certainly more sophisticated than a simple localiser deviation display, and it considered:
airplane yaw rate
cross body acceleration
localiser deviation
localiser deviation rate.
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Wengen
Age: 53
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
PVD
No self-respecting airline can be without this option.
It has unfortunately disappeared on the B748,B777x and B788.
In Airbus parlance it's called PVI but only one indicator on LH-side and this too is no longer on the option list of A388, A350 and A320 Neo.
It has unfortunately disappeared on the B748,B777x and B788.
In Airbus parlance it's called PVI but only one indicator on LH-side and this too is no longer on the option list of A388, A350 and A320 Neo.
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: UK
Posts: 730
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks, Wiggy.
Would I be right in y understanding that they rotate fast the greater the displacement from the centre-line?
It seems a shame to remove or omit kit that the pilots have a clear and unanimous liking of, but that's what happens when engineers and accountants have absolute dictat over cockpit design... Engineers can come up with wonderful solutions to problems, but only pilots can know what works and what doesn't for us. I get the impression that modern test pilots are told merely to prove the design flies, and not allowed to feed back recommendations of what would make it better for line pilots and crew.
Would I be right in y understanding that they rotate fast the greater the displacement from the centre-line?
It seems a shame to remove or omit kit that the pilots have a clear and unanimous liking of, but that's what happens when engineers and accountants have absolute dictat over cockpit design... Engineers can come up with wonderful solutions to problems, but only pilots can know what works and what doesn't for us. I get the impression that modern test pilots are told merely to prove the design flies, and not allowed to feed back recommendations of what would make it better for line pilots and crew.
My old company deactivated the PVD on the 744 for the simple reason they were never needed. Tragically the one time they might have saved the day in Taiwan, the crew failed to recognize the off-set indication.
We were CAT3b on the 744 and the R/W centre lights were more than adequate. The recency requirements in the Sim and the fact it was never really needed, killed it off. Maybe Boeing agrees. I found it very useful for an engine failure in low vis but that is all. Sometimes the men in white coats can have too many gadgets. (my new car suffers from Geek Overload and is driving me nuts).
We were CAT3b on the 744 and the R/W centre lights were more than adequate. The recency requirements in the Sim and the fact it was never really needed, killed it off. Maybe Boeing agrees. I found it very useful for an engine failure in low vis but that is all. Sometimes the men in white coats can have too many gadgets. (my new car suffers from Geek Overload and is driving me nuts).
wiggy:
Quick survey. Are PVDs (where installed) still largely implemented as electro-mechanical displays? Or have they gone to something like a one line graphic LCD?
are expensive to maintain
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Wengen
Age: 53
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So, if their elimination is an issue of maintenance expense and this is still a valued instrument, it surprises me that someone hasn't come out with a 'digital' barberpole display. Quite simple to to with a one line graphical LCD properly backlit. No moving parts and no noise.
Unless you like the noise. We could easily emulate that.
Unless you like the noise. We could easily emulate that.
My old company deactivated the PVD on the 744 for the simple reason they were never needed. Tragically the one time they might have saved the day in Taiwan, the crew failed to recognize the off-set indication.
I used to fly 744s with PVDs fitted, but never used them in anger. Most Capatains chose not to use them as many pilots don't find the dispaly intuitive.
The PVI is an option on FBW Airbus and (I gather) it is an LCD display. But very few operators have taken up the option.
Join Date: Dec 2013
Age: 81
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
History
I was at Smiths, working in the design labs, CH3, and can recall seeing our barbers pole type Para-Visual Director which was invented by Mr Majendie, I think he was one of our test pilots.
Photo as Fig 1 in here:
http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/ca...1969005146.pdf
Correction - Mr Majendie was a de Havilland Test Pilot, which would figure because we were doing the DH Trident Autoland. Saw him once when he visited Test Equipment lab.
Photo as Fig 1 in here:
http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/ca...1969005146.pdf
Correction - Mr Majendie was a de Havilland Test Pilot, which would figure because we were doing the DH Trident Autoland. Saw him once when he visited Test Equipment lab.
Last edited by henry_crun; 20th Dec 2013 at 22:38.