Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Question about entry into Reversal Procedure

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Question about entry into Reversal Procedure

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7th Apr 2011, 17:25
  #101 (permalink)  
9.G
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: paradise
Posts: 559
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ZIGGY 4 ARR for Ontario would probably be the one filed for coming from NW as indicated on the airdrome chart for El Monte. It brings you all the way around to PDZ. Not sure whether this has got anything to do with with the LAX airspace structure.
9.G is offline  
Old 7th Apr 2011, 19:31
  #102 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Where it's Too Cold
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
9.G = While I usually get he Z4 pretty early, it's always possible to lose radios prior to that clearance, and have to fly last known assigned alt/clearance to IAP.
theficklefinger is offline  
Old 7th Apr 2011, 19:42
  #103 (permalink)  
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: On the Beach
Posts: 3,336
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
9.G:

ZIGGY 4 ARR for Ontario would probably be the one filed for coming from NW as indicated on the airdrome chart for El Monte. It brings you all the way around to PDZ. Not sure whether this has got anything to do with with the LAX airspace structure.
As a practical matter, coming from any distance you would usually get that or the other STAR. They indeed add flight path miles (at least arriving from the NW to avoid LAX inbounds. But, V197 can avoid LAX inbounds, albeit with more handling by the Ontario area SoCal folks. And, if KONT is busy then V197 conflicts with the Pomona SID. But, KONT is often not busy, especially these days.

But, it is possible to get PMD V197 POM under some traffic conditions.

The circumstances do make a good hypothetical. Before those STARS came into being, coming from the NW, V197 if filed was usually granted with a crossing restriction at POM then a heading for vectors to final west of POM.
aterpster is offline  
Old 7th Apr 2011, 20:40
  #104 (permalink)  
9.G
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: paradise
Posts: 559
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
While I usually get he Z4 pretty early, it's always possible to lose radios prior to that clearance, and have to fly last known assigned alt/clearance to IAP.
Sure, no objections here on my side, theficklefinger.

As a practical matter, coming from any distance you would usually get that or the other STAR. They indeed add flight path miles (at least arriving from the NW to avoid LAX inbounds. But, V197 can avoid LAX inbounds, albeit with more handling by the Ontario area SoCal folks. And, if KONT is busy then V197 conflicts with the Pomona SID. But, KONT is often not busy, especially these days.
If filed and approved by all means I don't see any reason not to fly it as it shortens the mileage quite a bit. In practical terms whatever the dispatcher has filed as ATS flight plan I'll simply follow it, I don't have time and resources to explore all possible filing options during preflight briefing however knowing the local particularities may prompt a request to ATC while airborne to reroute if feasible.
9.G is offline  
Old 7th Apr 2011, 21:15
  #105 (permalink)  
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: On the Beach
Posts: 3,336
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
9.g:

KEMT is Piper/Cessna type airport. Coming down from the north is ususally over EHF. Being able to go PMD-POM cuts off a lot of miles.
aterpster is offline  
Old 11th Apr 2011, 14:24
  #106 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Mobile, AL
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm reading this with interest as the same issues came up last week as I was completing my JAA IR in Ireland.

Transiting from Dublin/Weston (EIWT) to Knock (EIKN) I was outside of the entry sector for the base turn for the ILS approach at EIKN. Looking to avoid the hold, I inquired about requesting manoeuvring space to the west of the beacon (within the DOC) to enable alignment with the base turn sector. No one had any problems with that, although I was cautioned that if the airspace was occupied that it would be denied. Fair enough...

In the end the examiner needed to see a hold so I just did the hold for alignment on the test itself
MarkMcC is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.