Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Windshield damage and Airline procedures

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Windshield damage and Airline procedures

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 18th Mar 2010, 01:05
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Melbourne
Age: 37
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Windshield damage and Airline procedures

Your outer shield is cracked by a bird...Would you continue as planned?
Dwight Goodman is offline  
Old 18th Mar 2010, 02:05
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 960
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
For our B737-700 IGW airplanes....

With either window 1, 2 or 3 outer panes cracked or shattered -

Continue normal operation.

But I wouldn't recommend operating the windshield wipers on that side for the main windows!

Cheers...FD...

Ooops, sorry....just read 'probationer',

Windows #1 and #2 are the main front windshields for each of the pilots.

Windows #3 are the big (both) sides (flight deck) windows.

cheers...
Flight Detent is offline  
Old 18th Mar 2010, 02:08
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Arizona USA
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Your outer shield is cracked by a bird...Would you continue as planned?
Normally yes.
Type L1011.
However, if visibily is degraded to a significant extent, then normally the window is replaced at the next station.
411A is offline  
Old 18th Mar 2010, 06:41
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Arizona USA
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
However - As pilots, how certain can you be that it is just the outer pane etc.
Depends on the type...L1011, it makes no difference.
No restrictions...pressurisation, speed, etc.
None.
411A is offline  
Old 18th Mar 2010, 11:26
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Scotland
Age: 80
Posts: 451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The outer glass is basically only to run windshield wipers and to give a scratchproof surface - it depends on manufacturer but can be as little as 1/8 of an inch thick. On 747 the prucedure is to remove the cracked outer glass before departure.
bcgallacher is offline  
Old 18th Mar 2010, 11:35
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 1,270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As pilots, how certain can you be that it is just the outer pane etc.
Close one eye whilst looking at the crack and place a pencil tip over it. Move your head a bit and the parallax will reveal how far away away the crack is.

Simples!
rudderrudderrat is offline  
Old 18th Mar 2010, 14:53
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: PuB near U
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Depends on type i guess. Some aircraft might have a level + pressure differential limit. If level restricted- fuel consideration.
The next consideration would be the sector- if u departing from base they might want u to go back and not AOG it out of base.
ggofpac is offline  
Old 18th Mar 2010, 19:55
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: OZ
Posts: 580
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The outer glass is basically only to run windshield wipers and to give a scratchproof surface - it depends on manufacturer but can be as little as 1/8 of an inch thick.
On 747 the procedure is to remove the cracked outer glass before departure.
747 #1 window, the procedure you refer to is for only 1 brand of window fitted to the 747 ("Triple X" I think). From memory to define the serviceability of the window required for dispatch revolved around visual impairment caused by the damage and structural security, whether arcing could be seen inside the window and the window heat was functional.
If any or all of these defects presented after a bird strike in flight, what would be the action?
Continue/return to an airport where these defects would cause the least issues? e.g avoid ice/rain conditions if avail.
Or fly on as 1 windscreen is serviceable ?
Bolty McBolt is offline  
Old 18th Mar 2010, 22:29
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: away from home
Posts: 896
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hmmm let's see. As far as I can recall I have had 4-5 outer pane failures in 3 different types of aircraft. None precluded me from continuing the flight to destination, however on 2 occasions I was leaving home base, and Maintenance wanted me back exactly for the reason that they had a window, whereas availability at outstation was either questionable or definitely non-existent. On the other occasions landed at destination and gave the airplane to Maintenance.
Non-events, except for a slightly extended layover at an outstation a couple of times.
oceancrosser is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2010, 02:20
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The outer pane on my aircraft (757/767) is not structural.
Cracking of any or all glass plies or delamination between any plies does
not affect the pressurization capability of the window.
In the absence of an air leak or window deformation, no airplane or cabin altitude change is necessary.
A window is deformed if it bulges or bows significantly.
UAL320Capt is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2010, 09:12
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: Ex-pat Aussie in the UK
Posts: 5,799
Received 121 Likes on 58 Posts
I've had a couple of the windows fail in flight on the 73. The QRH procedure has changed a few times over the past couple of years, generally becoming more conservative. Both of these failures (as are most) were due to arcing of the window heat. If the window failed due to a physical strike, then the integrity of the rest of the window must be called to question.

If the strike occurred in the climb, I would return. In the descent, I would land at destination. A bird strike is pretty unlikely in the cruise!
Checkboard is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.