Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

170kt to 5 at LGW

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

170kt to 5 at LGW

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 21st Feb 2009, 21:55
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Here and there
Posts: 2,781
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
170kt to 5 at LGW

I just wondered how everybody is getting on with the 170kt to 5nm trial at LGW?
tubby linton is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2009, 22:04
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: The Welsh Riviera
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No worries. Just fly two dots below the glide to 6d and then execute a 5g pull up to wash off the speed. (extending the gear and land flap as you do).

Maybe time to move some traffic out to the regional airports rather than compromise safety at the overcrowded London hubs dontchathink? Ah, but that would inconvenience the travel plans our our dearly beloved government employees mebee?

McDoo is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2009, 23:22
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: right here
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
you can also config to gear down and F15 before 5NM, but keep the bug at 170. not very economic, but than you are already in a "drag" config when you come to 5NM, so the speed fades quickly and you can go to landing flaps.
FCS Explorer is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2009, 23:24
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: I wouldn't know.
Posts: 4,498
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Probably as allways depends on type or even variant. In a 737 800 i do not see any problem even with SOP required gear extension at 2000RA and 1000ft established (configures, checklist done, >40% N1). However in a -700 it is a completely different kind of game as Vrefs are so slow with usual values between 110 and 125kts (F30), nearly impossible to get that right with 170 to 5 if you have stringent SOP restrictions.
Denti is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2009, 23:28
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: The Welsh Riviera
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
On a serious note (for which I am seriously not famous) 160 to 4d has been standard for a while. If asked to to 170 to 5d you still have a mile to lose ten knots to be back where we started. Anyone fly a type that struggles to do this?
McDoo is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2009, 01:01
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Near sheep!
Posts: 915
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What does this achieve at LGW? Surely it gives less chance to get the O/B's on their way??
WindSheer is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2009, 01:03
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: In a far better place
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
At the higher weights, flaps 10 works too.
captjns is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2009, 07:08
  #8 (permalink)  

Beacon Outbound
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: "Home is were the answer machine is"
Posts: 689
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I believe this came about because airlines asked for it. At least that is what I was told happened at STN were the same 170 to 5 has been in use for some time now.

160 to 4 doesn't work on on our type because the F5/F10 speed is often in the 165K range. We don't lower the gear until 4nm on a standard low drag approach (weather permitting), so would have to lower the gear early (and waste fuel) to select F15 to comply with 160kts.
IRRenewal is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2009, 07:22
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: NL
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What about the well accepted 1000´ AAL establishment criterium (speed/rate/thrust/config)?

Or r u guys flyin Cessna´s and Piper´s around?
RobinR200 is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2009, 07:31
  #10 (permalink)  

Beacon Outbound
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: "Home is were the answer machine is"
Posts: 689
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Or r u guys flyin [sic]
B738. Landing gate 500' VMC, 1000' IMC.
IRRenewal is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2009, 09:40
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: In a far better place
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
160 to 4 doesn't work on on our type because the F5/F10 speed is often in the 165K range.

ATC recognizes this and understands the fact that on some aircraft gear and flaps would have to be extended to maintain 160 knots on the nose, resulting in a larger noise foot print to those on the ground.

With that being said 164 knots has not been and still is not a show stopper for traffic separation with traffic 4 to 5 miles ahead flying 4 knots slower, which equates to a closure rate of 1 mile in 15 minutes… or 404’ per minute.
captjns is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2009, 10:43
  #12 (permalink)  

Beacon Outbound
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: "Home is were the answer machine is"
Posts: 689
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ATC recognizes this and understands the fact that on some aircraft gear and flaps would have to be extended to maintain 160 knots on the nose, resulting in a larger noise foot print to those on the ground.
Yep, I know that. But I have been told off by ATC before when their mode S readout showed I hadn't bugged 160k. In addition, the auto throttle in the Boeing has a tendency to fly on the fast side. This is due to the way the A/T logic works. Selecting 165 often results in the A/C flying around 170 kts.

170 to 5 gets around all of this just nicely.

not a show stopper for traffic separation with traffic 4 to 5 miles ahead flying 4 knots slower
Except that the traffic ahead is not flying at 160 kts any more, since they have slowed down to their final approach speed. If their final approach speed is 115 kts (and they started configuring early to get the speed off, as seems to be required on a light -700 according to earlier posters) and mine is 145 kts, that 10 kts extra speed to 4nm might just become a factor.

'continue approach, expect late landing clearance'
IRRenewal is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2009, 10:59
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: ? ? ?
Posts: 2,281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
To maintain 170 to OM is very often required in FRA.

But flying the big bus it's not so easy to decelerate to Vapp, 'round 135 Kts, AND comply with profile stabilization criteria when required to maintain 170 to 5.
Henry VIII is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2009, 12:36
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 2,044
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
IRR
But I have been told off by ATC before when their mode S readout showed I hadn't bugged 160k
I would be "surprised" if your Mode S reports "bugged" speed... If so, and this principle applied to an Airbus, ATC would have the delight of figuring out GS Mini

Our Mode S shows actual IAS (and other parameters). The only "bugged" parameter it shows is Altitude/FL.

See FlitePartners Ltd - Mode S Elementary & Enhanced Surveillance (EHS and ELS) for a list of "Enhanced Mode S" parameters...

NoD
NigelOnDraft is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2009, 12:47
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: in some mud
Age: 89
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
738 behind 319. Both supposedly flying 170kts. A 5 mile gap will rapidly turn into a no mile gap. Which is fun.
General_Kirby is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2009, 14:56
  #16 (permalink)  

Beacon Outbound
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: "Home is were the answer machine is"
Posts: 689
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nigel,

Quote from our ops manual:

Our aircraft are fitted with Enhanced Mode S transponders and ATC can
view:
• the flight number,
• current heading, altitude and speed selected on the MCP,
• the current V/S
But that came from ops, therefore not guaranteed to be technically correct. This exact wording was introduced in the ops manual in 2006. I'll ask some questions.
IRRenewal is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2009, 15:12
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: In a far better place
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This site give good information about Mode S operations.

EUROCONTROL - Mode S Operational Overview

http://www.caa.co.uk/docs/7/DAP_SSM_..._Factsheet.pdf

Both documents state that ATC can interrogate selected altitude and Aircraft call sign.

Enhanced Surveillance

Mode S Enhanced Surveillance provides all the functionality of Elementary Surveillance but, in addition, it provides Data Link functionality and access to further DAPs. In order to achieve this, the aircraft must have an interface between the transponder and its avionics system. The additional DAPs available are divided into the following 2 categories:

Aircraft Current State Vector Information

The aircraft current state vector information indicates the current state of motion of the aircraft. The information available includes:

(1) Ground Speed.
(2) Track Angle.
(3) Turn Rate.
(4) Roll Angle.
(5) Climb Rate.
(6) Magnetic Heading.
(7) Indicated Air Speed.
(8) Mach No.


Aircraft Intention Information

Aircraft intention information may be available from the avionics to indicate the future path of the aircraft. This information may be displayed to controllers and used to enhance Safety Net systems such as Short Term Conflict Alert (STCA). The information available includes Selected Altitude and the Barometric Pressure Setting on which this is based.

Last edited by captjns; 22nd Feb 2009 at 15:34.
captjns is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2009, 16:47
  #18 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Here and there
Posts: 2,781
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
My old airbus has a full flap extension speed of 175kt,and the athr is quite sloppy.160 to 4 was always better as you were not lowering flaps against the placard limit.We have had a lot of flap problems over the years and I wonder just how much of it can be blamed on the extra wear and tear from doing this.
tubby linton is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2009, 23:17
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Seems fine in the A321 so far. Gear just before 5 miles, and still passing 4 dme at 160kts or less.
Alteburger is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.