Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Application of P-RNAV in terminal airspace.

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Application of P-RNAV in terminal airspace.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 6th Sep 2008, 12:31
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Chester
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Application of P-RNAV in terminal airspace.

Have just read AIC92/2003 and TGL10 without finding the answer I was looking for.

My a/c is a 737NG which is P-RNAV capable.

My company is not P-RNAV approved (and I have not had the training which I need to answer the following questions).

1. Can someone please confirm I cannot operate an RNAV SID (such as the NICE PERUS 3B) which has no conventional overlay.

2. Is there such a thing as a PRNAV SID/STAR or only full RNAV and conventional overlay RNAV SID/STARs.

3. Is there any difference between SID and STARS...my understanding is that I cannot use RNAV (without conventional backup) below MSA on either?
300-600 is offline  
Old 6th Sep 2008, 19:30
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: London
Posts: 390
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1) You can operate a B-RNAV departure which has no conventional overlay (you'll find there is no turn below MSA). You just can't fly a PRNAV departure (clearly says PRNAV on the plate, not just RNAV), such as OKTET 3A (since you're talking about NICE).

2) Yes, there is such a thing as a pure PRNAV sid/star, refer to 1

3) Correct. Must be PRNAV for no conventional nav below MSA on both

P
Permafrost_ATPL is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2008, 11:03
  #3 (permalink)  
Sir George Cayley
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
P-RNAV is coming to UK airspace soon, but first DAP propose introducing B-NAV below FL 095. See the Campaign's website:
http://www.caa.co.uk/default.aspx?ca...29&pagetype=90

This will also remove ADF receivers from the schedule, thus allowing all those who currently put ADF u/s in the remarks column to come clean and admit one isn't even fitted!

Sir George Cayley
 
Old 7th Sep 2008, 11:22
  #4 (permalink)  
Sir George Cayley
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Just looking again at the first post, that AIC ref doesn't look right

http://www.nats-uk.ead-it.com/aip/cu...6_Y_125_en.pdf

This is the latest on the AIS website which laid the foundations for P-RNAV. I'm told the next step will widen the scope to CA beyond London late 2009/early 2010.

Also, I think the TGLs are to be included in EASA regulations; AMC 20-8 rings a bell.

Hope this helps

Sir George Cayley
 
Old 7th Sep 2008, 14:53
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Oztrailia
Posts: 2,991
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts
What ever happened to the day we used to file our own flight plans with the A/C equipment fitted: 2 VOR, 2 ILS, 2 ADF, Mode C etc etc

Too damn complicated now.
ACMS is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2008, 22:23
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: I'm somewhere where I don't know where I am.
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Interesting that the OKTET 3A from Nice Aerad plate (or whatever they are called these days) does not state PRNAV. I had to look to the French AIP to confirm that it was indeed a PRNAV departure. I have been looking for a reference that any departure with no overlay is PRNAV, however, haven't been bored enough to hit PANSOPS yet.
rudolf is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2008, 22:26
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: home
Posts: 1,567
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
rudolf,

Our jepp charts have the Oktet 3a as a PRNAV departure which would suggest that Aerad have missed it off your charts.
Right Way Up is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2008, 22:33
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: I'm somewhere where I don't know where I am.
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Have passed the info up, should be labeled next issue. Aerad, I mean EAG, yikes, rubbish!
rudolf is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2008, 10:20
  #9 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Chester
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for the replies so far guys.
The Oktet 3A/3E were actually the SIDs which started this thread for me and ,as has been said, certain plates do not state PRNAV which some pilots assume (incorrectly it seems) mean they can do a BRNAV departure without a conventional overlay. Although these two SIDs are similar the tracks are slightly different.

The AIC was from the crewroom (paper copy) which may well not have been updated (cost saving initiative rears its ugly head again).

If anyone can tell me how to get into PANSOPs I will have a look at the point Rudolf mentioned.

Cheers
300-600 is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2008, 13:22
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: France
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
P-RNAV is a uniquely European approval and is called RNAV 1 in PANS-OPS (or will be when the next amendment is published this November) You should never fly an RNAV SID or STAR using B-RNAV unless it clearly states on the chart that this is authorised. The problem is that the chart that the State publishes is generally not the chart that the pilot sees - EAG, Jepp et al have their own company standards and sometimes stuff can get missed in the transfer from State to Industry.

As far as flight planning is concerned, stand by for a change when the new PBN rules come in - not sure when, but you will be asked to file PBN/D1-4 if Field 18. D1= RNAV 1 All sensors, D2= RNAV 1 GNSS, D3=RNAV 1 DME/DME and D4=RNAV 1 DME/DME/IRU
LLLK is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2008, 13:25
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: France
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
P-RNAV is still governed by TGL 10 rev 1 at the moment. When it moves to AMC 20 I believe that it will be called AMC 20-16 but this will not be for another 6-9 months.
LLLK is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2008, 20:49
  #12 (permalink)  
Sir George Cayley
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
PANS-OPS is ICAO Doc 4444 see ICAO | International Civil Aviation Organization

Have a credit card ready with plenty of spondulix as it's v expensive

What am I saying? You fly a BBJ

It's cheep

Sir George Cayley
 
Old 9th Sep 2008, 22:03
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Victoria, BC
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
For free ICAO Docs go here: http://dcaa.slv.dk000/icaodocs/

DOC 4444 is there
eflowj is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.