Application of P-RNAV in terminal airspace.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Chester
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Application of P-RNAV in terminal airspace.
Have just read AIC92/2003 and TGL10 without finding the answer I was looking for.
My a/c is a 737NG which is P-RNAV capable.
My company is not P-RNAV approved (and I have not had the training which I need to answer the following questions).
1. Can someone please confirm I cannot operate an RNAV SID (such as the NICE PERUS 3B) which has no conventional overlay.
2. Is there such a thing as a PRNAV SID/STAR or only full RNAV and conventional overlay RNAV SID/STARs.
3. Is there any difference between SID and STARS...my understanding is that I cannot use RNAV (without conventional backup) below MSA on either?
My a/c is a 737NG which is P-RNAV capable.
My company is not P-RNAV approved (and I have not had the training which I need to answer the following questions).
1. Can someone please confirm I cannot operate an RNAV SID (such as the NICE PERUS 3B) which has no conventional overlay.
2. Is there such a thing as a PRNAV SID/STAR or only full RNAV and conventional overlay RNAV SID/STARs.
3. Is there any difference between SID and STARS...my understanding is that I cannot use RNAV (without conventional backup) below MSA on either?
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: London
Posts: 390
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
1) You can operate a B-RNAV departure which has no conventional overlay (you'll find there is no turn below MSA). You just can't fly a PRNAV departure (clearly says PRNAV on the plate, not just RNAV), such as OKTET 3A (since you're talking about NICE).
2) Yes, there is such a thing as a pure PRNAV sid/star, refer to 1
3) Correct. Must be PRNAV for no conventional nav below MSA on both
P
2) Yes, there is such a thing as a pure PRNAV sid/star, refer to 1
3) Correct. Must be PRNAV for no conventional nav below MSA on both
P
Guest
Posts: n/a
P-RNAV is coming to UK airspace soon, but first DAP propose introducing B-NAV below FL 095. See the Campaign's website:
http://www.caa.co.uk/default.aspx?ca...29&pagetype=90
This will also remove ADF receivers from the schedule, thus allowing all those who currently put ADF u/s in the remarks column to come clean and admit one isn't even fitted!
Sir George Cayley
http://www.caa.co.uk/default.aspx?ca...29&pagetype=90
This will also remove ADF receivers from the schedule, thus allowing all those who currently put ADF u/s in the remarks column to come clean and admit one isn't even fitted!
Sir George Cayley
Guest
Posts: n/a
Just looking again at the first post, that AIC ref doesn't look right
http://www.nats-uk.ead-it.com/aip/cu...6_Y_125_en.pdf
This is the latest on the AIS website which laid the foundations for P-RNAV. I'm told the next step will widen the scope to CA beyond London late 2009/early 2010.
Also, I think the TGLs are to be included in EASA regulations; AMC 20-8 rings a bell.
Hope this helps
Sir George Cayley
http://www.nats-uk.ead-it.com/aip/cu...6_Y_125_en.pdf
This is the latest on the AIS website which laid the foundations for P-RNAV. I'm told the next step will widen the scope to CA beyond London late 2009/early 2010.
Also, I think the TGLs are to be included in EASA regulations; AMC 20-8 rings a bell.
Hope this helps
Sir George Cayley
Join Date: May 2000
Location: I'm somewhere where I don't know where I am.
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Interesting that the OKTET 3A from Nice Aerad plate (or whatever they are called these days) does not state PRNAV. I had to look to the French AIP to confirm that it was indeed a PRNAV departure. I have been looking for a reference that any departure with no overlay is PRNAV, however, haven't been bored enough to hit PANSOPS yet.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Chester
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks for the replies so far guys.
The Oktet 3A/3E were actually the SIDs which started this thread for me and ,as has been said, certain plates do not state PRNAV which some pilots assume (incorrectly it seems) mean they can do a BRNAV departure without a conventional overlay. Although these two SIDs are similar the tracks are slightly different.
The AIC was from the crewroom (paper copy) which may well not have been updated (cost saving initiative rears its ugly head again).
If anyone can tell me how to get into PANSOPs I will have a look at the point Rudolf mentioned.
Cheers
The Oktet 3A/3E were actually the SIDs which started this thread for me and ,as has been said, certain plates do not state PRNAV which some pilots assume (incorrectly it seems) mean they can do a BRNAV departure without a conventional overlay. Although these two SIDs are similar the tracks are slightly different.
The AIC was from the crewroom (paper copy) which may well not have been updated (cost saving initiative rears its ugly head again).
If anyone can tell me how to get into PANSOPs I will have a look at the point Rudolf mentioned.
Cheers
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: France
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
P-RNAV is a uniquely European approval and is called RNAV 1 in PANS-OPS (or will be when the next amendment is published this November) You should never fly an RNAV SID or STAR using B-RNAV unless it clearly states on the chart that this is authorised. The problem is that the chart that the State publishes is generally not the chart that the pilot sees - EAG, Jepp et al have their own company standards and sometimes stuff can get missed in the transfer from State to Industry.
As far as flight planning is concerned, stand by for a change when the new PBN rules come in - not sure when, but you will be asked to file PBN/D1-4 if Field 18. D1= RNAV 1 All sensors, D2= RNAV 1 GNSS, D3=RNAV 1 DME/DME and D4=RNAV 1 DME/DME/IRU
As far as flight planning is concerned, stand by for a change when the new PBN rules come in - not sure when, but you will be asked to file PBN/D1-4 if Field 18. D1= RNAV 1 All sensors, D2= RNAV 1 GNSS, D3=RNAV 1 DME/DME and D4=RNAV 1 DME/DME/IRU
Guest
Posts: n/a
PANS-OPS is ICAO Doc 4444 see ICAO | International Civil Aviation Organization
Have a credit card ready with plenty of spondulix as it's v expensive
What am I saying? You fly a BBJ
It's cheep
Sir George Cayley
Have a credit card ready with plenty of spondulix as it's v expensive
What am I saying? You fly a BBJ
It's cheep
Sir George Cayley
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Victoria, BC
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts