Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Boeing 777 perfornace


Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Boeing 777 perfornace

Old 1st June 2008 | 18:02
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
From: far my house
Boeing 777 perfornace

Hello:

Some can give me or tell me where to get the manual performance, software performance or similar of the Boeing 777.

is to make a comparative level with the 340 itself. Any information about the performance or operation serves me.

Thank you
Reddot is offline  
Reply
Old 1st June 2008 | 18:34
  #2 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,486
Likes: 8
From: The No Transgression Zone
As a perpetual student of the aeronautical art and history--I' d say do a search on Pprune-First

When I was still an official student --i learned to sit down shut up and regard expert opinions whehter written or spoken--and to take heed of their correction--

Keep learning,

PA
Pugilistic Animus is offline  
Reply
Old 1st June 2008 | 18:44
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
From: far my house
Do not judge without knowing each other's experience, may bring a surprise.

Greetings
Reddot is offline  
Reply
Old 1st June 2008 | 19:21
  #4 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 565
Likes: 0
From: in the mist
What sort of performance informtion are you after? Comparing a 4 engine aeroplane with a 2 engine aeroplane or more specifically the B777 with the A340?

The twin will have more excess power in just about every case (excluding Concorde and mil jets of course!). You'll find the take-off performance and climb performance is better on the B777, especially if you're looking at comparing it with the original A340s.
TheGorrilla is offline  
Reply
Old 1st June 2008 | 21:58
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
From: Windsor CA 95492
Since both the twin and 4-engined aircraft has to be capable of dealing with loss of an engine at any point during take-off it is inevitable that the thrust to weight ratio necessary for twin is larger than tat for four engines. I think it is as simple as that, unless somebody can suggest an alternative.
keith smith is offline  
Reply
Old 1st June 2008 | 22:01
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
From: Windsor CA 95492
I would think the same arguements would apply to Concorde and military if they are intended to be airworthy
keith smith is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd June 2008 | 04:41
  #7 (permalink)  
100 Countries Visited
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 5,552
Likes: 25
From: ME
Reddot,

You might find that we are weary of new-joiners in this forum....... Come back in a month and ask the same question again.......

Mutt
mutt is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd June 2008 | 10:47
  #8 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
From: far my house
A comparison is about runway analysis, the runway lenght TOW, Vspeeds ...

Any info is still good ...

Thank you
Reddot is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.