Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

LH A320 Rough Landing @ Hamburg

Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

LH A320 Rough Landing @ Hamburg

Old 1st Mar 2008, 17:36
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: SFO
Age: 41
Posts: 63
LH A320 Rough Landing @ Hamburg


Must have been real windy!
JuniorMan is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2008, 18:20
  #2 (permalink)  
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 110
Is that... real?


Taking a second look...

Shouldn't the turning spoilers, or, at least the ailerons, show some attempt to prevent that from happening? And the elevator, doesn't look like there is any up force being applied...

It does look fake... although I might be wrong.
PA38-Pilot is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2008, 18:21
  #3 (permalink)  
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: EDDL
Posts: 14
WOW .. haven't seen an engine that close to the ground yet, anybody knows how it ended up ?
G09 is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2008, 19:11
  #4 (permalink)  
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Herts, UK
Posts: 743

Think this a video of said incident...

Frightening conditions! Looked like maybe kicked off drift a fraction early and allowed upwind wing to react to (yet another) big gust...

Anyone what happened after the go-around?
HarryMann is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2008, 19:12
  #5 (permalink)  
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: At the end of the Met line
Posts: 162
If that was today the TAF read something along the lines of TEMPO 250/25G45 TEMPO 250/35G60.

Video looks like final flare was about the intersection of 15/33, where there is potential for a blast of wind!

Last edited by cheesycol; 1st Mar 2008 at 19:25.
cheesycol is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2008, 19:26
  #6 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: SFO
Age: 41
Posts: 63
Can any Airbus drivers post the crosswind limitations on this type?
JuniorMan is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2008, 19:33
  #7 (permalink)  
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: 'An Airfield Somewhere in England'
Posts: 1,094
T/O 29 kts gusting 38 kts
Ldg: 33 kts gusting 38 kts

for non-contaminated runways - goes down for flooded runways, snow, ice etc.
Norman Stanley Fletcher is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2008, 19:39
  #8 (permalink)  
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 113
EDDH 011220Z 29028G48KT 9000 -SHRA FEW011 BKN014 07/05 Q0984 TEMPO 29035G55KT 4000 SHRA BKN008
0-8 is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2008, 19:41
  #9 (permalink)  
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: At the deck
Posts: 17
Anybody knows what runway were they using for landing???

DVD is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2008, 20:14
  #10 (permalink)  

Apache for HEMS - Strafe those Survivors!
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: uk
Posts: 120
I am not an A320 pilot, but wonder if one could answer. I was given to understand, by a colleague with experience of airbus, that it is not expected that you remove (all) drift before touchdown in strong x-winds, as the side stick is set up such that any input you make, to counteract yaw induced roll, generates a given roll rate, as opposed to merely being an input to counter the yaw induced roll from kicking off any drift. Not sure if I expressed that very well, but the upshot is that the airbus can be "quite demanding" to land in strong, gusty, x-winds.

Not seen the pics but the main thing is that everyones ok
keepin it in trim is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2008, 20:15
  #11 (permalink)  
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: here and there
Posts: 74
Wind from the right 290/!! looks like rwy23 to me.
Other choice would be Rwy 33 but without a really big improvement and I am not sure if RWY33 has a ILS
Cityliner is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2008, 20:22
  #12 (permalink)  
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Netherlands
Age: 39
Posts: 19
Well with the wind stated above for rwy 23, it looks to me that it was over the crosswind limit.
Dutch250 is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2008, 20:27
  #13 (permalink)  
Join Date: Sep 1999
Posts: 542
Truly amazing video.
I heard crosswind landings are tricky in the Airbus.Perhaps an Airbus pilot can comment further?
How many pilots have a crosswind chart to hand?This is one of those situations when you cant just guess the component.
Nevertheless,the pilot reacted well after the gust caught him after the touchdown(or bounce).
Right main gear should have touched first with right wing down.Looks like the opposite occurred.Also he was chasing his track throughout and was always left.Also,looks like he committed the cardinal sin and relaxed after the touchdown.Stopped flying the plane.Momentarily.However,he recovered and pulled up.
A good CP would probably put them both in the sim until they get the technique right and make sure they both have a crosswind chart.If you're outside the limits,you cant continue...pilots always try and get in.Its a natural instinct which we have to fight.
Rananim is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2008, 20:37
  #14 (permalink)  
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Up north
Posts: 1,647
Landings and airbuses...always been a bit of a discussion...

I have quite a bit of experience on the airbus and as far as airbuses and landings goes - You land it like you land ANY conventional aircraft! No brain surgery to it and no reason to re-invent flying.

The landing on this picture....wow, I thought my landing this evening was bad!

Happy landings folks!

CaptainProp is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2008, 20:50
  #15 (permalink)  
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 25,667

Good grief!
BEagle is online now  
Old 1st Mar 2008, 21:11
  #16 (permalink)  
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: South Oxfordshire
Posts: 611
So how many weeks do you reckon it will take to come down off the adrenaline high?

Bet it was verrrry quiet in the cabin on the next approach.
Blues&twos is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2008, 21:12
  #17 (permalink)  
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ireland
Posts: 81
Anyone know if they switched runway or tried the same one again?
Zyox is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2008, 21:15
  #18 (permalink)  
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Germany
Posts: 121
Dont mind the switching of runways, maybe a switch in AIRPORT!!
HighLow is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2008, 21:18
  #19 (permalink)  
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 298
a bit of facts:
wind was 290/33 gusts to 49 (time ~ 13:55)
happened on flight LH 044 (D-AIQP) a A320 from MUC
runway for landing 23 LOC-DME (ATIS gave no other option)
after g/a, pilots elected runway 33 also LOC-DME approach and landed safely but minus the left winglet...
immediately after the incident ATIS gave runway 23 and 33 as well

was a hell of a storm today, rocky landings all day round...
KLM refused to depart on 23 in that conditions and preferred to wait for 40 minutes for t/o rwy 33
Emirates A345 tried once 23, 15 minutes later 33, but broke off each time, exceeded bank angles on final, diverted to FRA
other widebody ground service was unable to lift up catering boxes due to windforce...all because of emma.
readywhenreaching is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2008, 21:23
  #20 (permalink)  
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Germany
Posts: 121
OK, in this business it doesn't take much to get caught out,
we must at all times as aviation professionals keep on our guard right up until engine shutdown,

BUT the question needs to be asked..
When is a crosswind limitation NOT a crosswind limitation?

GET-HOME-"EYE"-TUS seems to be such a TABOO in this industry..

Glad to see nobody killed during this incident

HighLow is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information

Copyright 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.