Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

EO SID In Go-Around in Madrid

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

EO SID In Go-Around in Madrid

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 9th May 2007 | 20:09
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
From: Europe
EO SID In Go-Around in Madrid

Say if you are in Madrid Barajas and doing an ILS 33R and you have an Engine Failure in the Go Around.
Scenario 1 HOT and Heavy
Scenario 2 Light and Cold temps.

They are doing departures on 36R.
There is an engine out departure procedure for 36R.
( at 2600 feet turn right to 090 interecept the 360 Radial,etc )

When would you do the published missed approach or the engine failure procedure ? WIth the engine failure in the go around.


With terrain in consideration ? Take offs on runway 36r.

A penny for your thoughts ? Cheers.
Mach trim is offline  
Reply
Old 9th May 2007 | 21:11
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
From: Madrid
The critical scenario arises when aproaching 33R and departing from 36L, SID and miss aproach procedure intersect. When aproaching aircraft is close enough to 33R THR,take offs are not authorized from 36L.
The GA manouver or intention must be reported ASAP.
I would fly the standard miss aproach even in engine out conditions.
alatriste is offline  
Reply
Old 10th May 2007 | 19:20
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,337
Likes: 1
From: Sunrise Senior Living
My Company's EO Sid for 36L is similar to the Map for 33L so I would stick with the standard Map ie ahead, left towards 'ACD' and left again to the 'GE' to hold at 5000 which keeps you away from the high ground - sorry I can't be more specific, don't have the appropriate docs at home.

Cheers,
mcdhu
mcdhu is offline  
Reply
Old 12th May 2007 | 08:59
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
From: EGPH
I fly into Madrid and the Missed Approach Procedures are a bit complex compared to most oter airports.
However, you surely must fly the missed approach procedure because:

1. It is what ATC is expecting. Do they know you emergency turn procedure? It may well be different to mine.

2. Missed approach procedures are designed to be flown engine out - if you are not above the max landing weight for that approach you will meet the terrain restrictions/ WAT climb limits.

3. Engine out emergency turns etc are designed for take offs. At Madrid, it is likely that you will start the Go Around at approx 120 kts, 200' AAL and before the start of the runway.
renard is offline  
Reply
Old 12th May 2007 | 11:19
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,611
Likes: 0
From: Hampshire physically; Perthshire and Pembrokeshire mentally.
I you ever have the misfortune to go around at MAD you will have to be VERY firm with ATC. I've done it once when I had a gear malfunction on approach. It was bedlam! They will try to run you out of fuel with vectors half way to Malaga. 1800 kgs later (A320) we landed.
Wingswinger is offline  
Reply
Old 13th May 2007 | 12:35
  #6 (permalink)  


PPRuNeaholic
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 3,255
Likes: 0
From: Cairns FNQ
2. Missed approach procedures are designed to be flown engine out
Oh no they are not. It doesn't matter whether the procedure is designed to TERPs or Pans Ops criteria, the published missed approach does not normally cater for a climb gradient of less than 2.5%.
OzExpat is offline  
Reply
Old 13th May 2007 | 14:00
  #7 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 118
Likes: 1
From: Geneva
actually it does

you fly the missed approach track and accelerate to clean or hold speed at 1500' aal or the published acceleration altitude. the go around track gives you 2,5° angle and is protected from obstacles. that's why you have to calculate your engine out climb angle performance in relation with temp/qnh/wind/weight in certain places (ie marseille landing 13 or naples 24)

for madrid it's compulsory to fly the go around procedure and inform atc asap

input from the locals would be interesting

seb
airseb is offline  
Reply
Old 16th May 2007 | 09:21
  #8 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 388
Likes: 2
From: Floating around the planet
despite beeing single engine you are supposed to comply with the approach climb gradients , so I would follow the standard missed approach
A-3TWENTY is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.