Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Airline JAA Logbook Entry

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Airline JAA Logbook Entry

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20th Mar 2007, 12:56
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bournemouth UK
Age: 49
Posts: 863
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
SkyWave and Mr. B, I'm afraid you're showing your ages!
But I'm just a wee nipper! well maybe that's an exaggeration but I'm not very old and I've only ever held a JAA licence.

It does however appear that I referenced an old source. I'm just starting in the airline world and have been searching for an answer to the IF question, and everyone you ask has a different opinion. I've searched all previous pprune threads and the posters can never agree. I should really have gone straight to JAA-FCL1 in the first place.

I will therefore elect to go with JAA-FCL 1.080 and await a training captain to tell me that I'm doing it wrong, however the way I read this it doesn't look like use of the remarks column is optional. Therefore should we be logging actual instrument time in the remarks column and IFR time in the operating conditions column?

(v) A remarks column will be provided to give details of specific functions e.g. SPIC, PICUS, instrument flight time*, etc.
* A pilot may log as instrument flight time only that time during which he
operates the aircraft solely by reference to instruments, under actual or
simulated instrument flight conditions
The above does not state that it’s optional to record specific functions eg instrument time.

JAA-FCL 1.080 part (b) section (5) Doesn't really make sense anyway because it states that operating conditions should be recorded (i)Night, (ii)IFR, yet IFR is not an operating condition, it is a set of rules, IMC however is an operating condition as is night. I think I'm more confused than when I started.

(5) Operational conditions:
(i) Night
(ii) IFR

Can airline pilots in the JAA world confirm that they log the full block to block time as IFR in the operating conditions column regardless of whether they are PF or PM? Do you guys n girls just not bother recording time that you are in actual IMC?
Sky Wave is offline  
Old 20th Mar 2007, 13:08
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bournemouth UK
Age: 49
Posts: 863
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Having read Mr B's last post and the JAA definition of IFR conditions, surely we should only be recording actual IMC time in the Operating Conditions Column?

(5) Operational conditions:
(i) Night
(ii) IFR
‘IFR conditions’ means weather conditions below the minimum for flight under visual flight rules
Sky Wave is offline  
Old 20th Mar 2007, 15:49
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: If this is Tuesday, it must be?
Posts: 651
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's all fairly academic anyway apart from the first couple of years of your career. Once you've got the ATPL issued there is nothing (in JAR or FAA lands) that actually hinges on time spent flying IF or IFR or in IMC. So I just leave my electronic logbook in its default setting of recording all flight time as IFR and in the last 10,000 hours nobody's asked about it.
BizJetJock is offline  
Old 20th Mar 2007, 17:19
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Long ago and far away ......
Posts: 1,399
Received 11 Likes on 5 Posts
Sky Wave,

I think you have pinpointed it with your last post - if the EASA definition of ‘IFR conditions’ is as it says it is, then it really should be an IF or IMC column, not IFR, in the JAR logbook. That then would make the recording of IF in the remarks column unnecessary.

Told you this Eurocrat bollocks is precisely that - BOLLOCKS!
MrBernoulli is offline  
Old 20th Mar 2007, 22:46
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Northern Lights
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I agree with MrBernoulli vbmenu_register("postmenu_3187725", true);

I operate under my JAA licence on the B737,and I only log the time IF when its my sector and I am manipulating the controls in IF conditions.
So in gereral terms I am always logging less than 50% of the total block time as IF.
The same applies when I am operating under my Australian licence flying in Australia.

There is really no point in logging all your block time as IF. Makes no sense at all.
airbond is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2007, 00:00
  #26 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: various places .....
Posts: 7,187
Received 97 Likes on 65 Posts
.. really not worth getting excited over, chaps ... perhaps we can relax a tad ?
john_tullamarine is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2007, 12:40
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Moon
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah I agree. Way too much sweat over this. Now if we were talking about how much vermouth to put in a Martini then it might be worth it...
Fatter Bastard is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2007, 17:46
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Long ago and far away ......
Posts: 1,399
Received 11 Likes on 5 Posts
4 fingers of Vermouth ........ and JAR logbook 'IFR' is a big load of cack!
MrBernoulli is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2007, 19:42
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: about 16 mins away from work...
Age: 54
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Martinis

Fatter Bastard, and Dear Chaps (that's right - about 85 % of you are British I'm afraid…It does explain the impeccable language, excellent humour, and unfortunately the insensible bickering on this site - only you Brits can do it…)

I must admit I especially loved Mr Clarence Oveur’s comment to Mr. Bernoulli -It was exquisitely amusing, you nailed the coffin there partner!!
A bit on the side, although very important (to my Norwegian standards at least...):

Sir Winston meant that it was enough for his bottle of Gin to be standing next to your Noilly-Prat in order to call it a Dry Martini.
Personally, I put in some Noilly-Prat, stir the glass vigorously, and then pour the Vermouth out again. The Bombay Sapphire then goes in and garnish with one Olive. Hopefully after that, you fellows can stop this meaningless discussion and continue to enjoy life.

Life’s in the aviation business is way too short to drink weak and poorly made Martinis.

Sauter (Norwegian Hedonist)
Sauter is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.