"I've decided NOT to contact Medlink"
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: The Pub
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"I've decided NOT to contact Medlink"
This is something that disturbed me while I was doing a briefing a few months ago. But also it came up in conversation with a good friend a few days ago.
Both times the crew had a medical incident on board during the cruise where they wanted medlink contacted for assitance, both times the captain decided NOT to contact Medlink.
As far as I am aware unless we are landing (which in neither situation was happening and no decision to divert had been made yet) it is the cabin crews decision to ask for medlink assistance and the captain should do as they ask. It may be a while before the captain is fully aware of all the facts because the assessor on the scene may be in the process of saving someones life.
In a serious medical incident time is the number one most important factor and the quicker things happen the more likely things will turn out ok. If we have asked for Medlink assistance it is not something we do lightly and you can be sure that we think things are looking pretty bad.
It can take up to an hour to contact Medlink so again any delay can be the difference between life and death.
The thing to think about in any medical situation is to have as much help and assistance as possible, not hinderance. If it was a loved one of yours being treated by a crew member you'd want them to have every possible chance of survival - Medlink is one more chance!!
I'd hate to be the one to tell the family that everything possible was NOT done. I'd also hate to be the person who hadn't acted on the cabin crews request for medlink assistance and it all going wrong - a lifetime of guilt?
Scary stuff!! Think about it.....
Both times the crew had a medical incident on board during the cruise where they wanted medlink contacted for assitance, both times the captain decided NOT to contact Medlink.
As far as I am aware unless we are landing (which in neither situation was happening and no decision to divert had been made yet) it is the cabin crews decision to ask for medlink assistance and the captain should do as they ask. It may be a while before the captain is fully aware of all the facts because the assessor on the scene may be in the process of saving someones life.
In a serious medical incident time is the number one most important factor and the quicker things happen the more likely things will turn out ok. If we have asked for Medlink assistance it is not something we do lightly and you can be sure that we think things are looking pretty bad.
It can take up to an hour to contact Medlink so again any delay can be the difference between life and death.
The thing to think about in any medical situation is to have as much help and assistance as possible, not hinderance. If it was a loved one of yours being treated by a crew member you'd want them to have every possible chance of survival - Medlink is one more chance!!
I'd hate to be the one to tell the family that everything possible was NOT done. I'd also hate to be the person who hadn't acted on the cabin crews request for medlink assistance and it all going wrong - a lifetime of guilt?
Scary stuff!! Think about it.....
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: uk
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The only negative thing I've come across using Medlink is that they are very keen to get you on the ground to investigate further. This may sound sensible most of the time, but that little nerdy accountant part of the pilots brain starts to ring up the dollar signs, and you know that you are talking to medics, not ops.
Having said that, if a doc says to me 'you need to land' then I can stand quite happily in front of my boss when I have to explain why I diverted at vast expense to the company, because I have done the right thing.
Not sure if this answers your point, but it might show a different light on the subject for you.
Having said that, if a doc says to me 'you need to land' then I can stand quite happily in front of my boss when I have to explain why I diverted at vast expense to the company, because I have done the right thing.
Not sure if this answers your point, but it might show a different light on the subject for you.
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Up North
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Shadowpurser
Surely the only delay can be in establishing HF comms in order
to phone patch to Medlink. In my experience this has taken
minutes I can count on the fingers of one hand.
There is then however, once details of symptoms etc are passed,
the inevitable delay "Standby, while I get the Medlink Physician"
A superb service which we couldn't do without!
Rgds
The Moss
It can take up to an hour to contact Medlink so again any delay can be the difference between life and death.
to phone patch to Medlink. In my experience this has taken
minutes I can count on the fingers of one hand.
There is then however, once details of symptoms etc are passed,
the inevitable delay "Standby, while I get the Medlink Physician"
A superb service which we couldn't do without!
Rgds
The Moss
Hard to believe that a Captain would turn down a request to contact Medlink. Is one of the best "cover your own behind" decisions you can make! In my experience with Medlink they are more likely to make you continue. On a couple of occasions with people suffering suspected heart attacks, we were given advice to continue!
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Shadowpurser
Get your company to invest in Tempus2000 bmi have it on the A330 it has been an invaluable tool that the Pilot medical officer sorted out.
It uses sat phone jack points in the cabin, so you can call them yourself and the other line sends all the telemetry to them for them to make their decision.
All you do is let 'em know up the pointy end you are using it to help diagnose a patient.
Correct decision making can then flow from there!
FPC
Any other Q's send me a pm.!
It uses sat phone jack points in the cabin, so you can call them yourself and the other line sends all the telemetry to them for them to make their decision.
All you do is let 'em know up the pointy end you are using it to help diagnose a patient.
Correct decision making can then flow from there!
FPC
Any other Q's send me a pm.!
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Camp X-Ray
Posts: 2,135
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Two points to consider Shadow:
1) If your friends were on one of our shiny new Airbusses then they don't have HF fitted.
2) If they weren't on an Airbus then the HF fitted may not actually have been serviceable.
Without HF comms none of our shorthaul fleet have a quick or easy way of contacting Medlink - VHF frequencies change every few minutes and the ACARS system is both very user unfriendly and totally dependent on info from the Assessor, who is course busy saving some ones life. To be quite honest if the situation is so serious that no time can be spared to speak to the flight crew then we need to be tolds. That means if people aren't breathing, or are bleeding uncontrollably, or are in agonising pain, or are turning blue in the face then we need to know. Over 90% of our short haul network we can get the aircraft on the ground within 15 minutes, faster than we can establish useful two-way comms with Medlink. If the situation is serious they're going to ask us to divert anyway and we'd rather get on with the work than mess about with ACARS. If the passenger looks like they're going to live then it's safer overall for us both to be flying the aircraft as fast as possible to destination than disregard all normal checks and procedures whilst one pilot is completely out of the loop.
In summary, for short haul Medlink is a useful tool, but only if you've got lots of time spare to wait for a response. If the situation is time critical then tell us and we'll land the thing without waiting for Medlink.
Of course, disregard the above if your friends were on a long haul flight over the middle of the ocean!
1) If your friends were on one of our shiny new Airbusses then they don't have HF fitted.
2) If they weren't on an Airbus then the HF fitted may not actually have been serviceable.
Without HF comms none of our shorthaul fleet have a quick or easy way of contacting Medlink - VHF frequencies change every few minutes and the ACARS system is both very user unfriendly and totally dependent on info from the Assessor, who is course busy saving some ones life. To be quite honest if the situation is so serious that no time can be spared to speak to the flight crew then we need to be tolds. That means if people aren't breathing, or are bleeding uncontrollably, or are in agonising pain, or are turning blue in the face then we need to know. Over 90% of our short haul network we can get the aircraft on the ground within 15 minutes, faster than we can establish useful two-way comms with Medlink. If the situation is serious they're going to ask us to divert anyway and we'd rather get on with the work than mess about with ACARS. If the passenger looks like they're going to live then it's safer overall for us both to be flying the aircraft as fast as possible to destination than disregard all normal checks and procedures whilst one pilot is completely out of the loop.
In summary, for short haul Medlink is a useful tool, but only if you've got lots of time spare to wait for a response. If the situation is time critical then tell us and we'll land the thing without waiting for Medlink.
Of course, disregard the above if your friends were on a long haul flight over the middle of the ocean!
Helicopter Pilots Get It Up Quicker
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location:
Posts: 885
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Frequently being on the receiving end of Medlink's patients - my thoughts....
It is very difficult to diagnose a patient over a radio/phone link. Non medical personnel are notoriously bad at describing signs and symptoms and even relatively simple tasks such as taking pulses, blood pressures and recording respiratory rates require regular practise to be confident of an accurate result.
Many of the patients I/we see have completely different signs and symptoms and ultimately different illnesses/injuries to the Medlink diagnosis. This can result in avoidable diversions if a proper diagnosis is not made. However as has been said an un-necessary diversion is probably better for business than a dead passenger and the ensuing legal/pr issues! No medical staff are going to ridicule you or complain about the call if you geninuely thought the pax was (dangerously/seriously) ill. (Call us out at 0400 for a crap job - Delhi belly for 3 days before boarding etc.... take your chance!)
I would say first ASK if there are any medically trained pax on board, who are willing to help - (varies between country again, but), most medical staff have a duty to treat a patient within their own skill level, to avoid negilgence claims.
Second choice has to be telemetry - if properly connected to the pax then its as good as a nurse/doctor/paramedic taking the observations.
Third would of course be Medlink.
Finally don't forget to ask the pax - they may actually know what's wrong with them, as may the travelling companions. Too often people call ambulances without asking the patient if they are actually ill!
PS. If you call an emergency ambulance to meet your flight PLEASE keep all the pax sat down in their seats until the ambulance crew are on board - its very difficult fighting your way through 300 people all trying to go the opposite way to you! Those of us who work at the airports regularly are aware of turnaround times and customer service issues particular to airlines and will make every effort to let you carry on as normal asap.
PW
It is very difficult to diagnose a patient over a radio/phone link. Non medical personnel are notoriously bad at describing signs and symptoms and even relatively simple tasks such as taking pulses, blood pressures and recording respiratory rates require regular practise to be confident of an accurate result.
Many of the patients I/we see have completely different signs and symptoms and ultimately different illnesses/injuries to the Medlink diagnosis. This can result in avoidable diversions if a proper diagnosis is not made. However as has been said an un-necessary diversion is probably better for business than a dead passenger and the ensuing legal/pr issues! No medical staff are going to ridicule you or complain about the call if you geninuely thought the pax was (dangerously/seriously) ill. (Call us out at 0400 for a crap job - Delhi belly for 3 days before boarding etc.... take your chance!)
I would say first ASK if there are any medically trained pax on board, who are willing to help - (varies between country again, but), most medical staff have a duty to treat a patient within their own skill level, to avoid negilgence claims.
Second choice has to be telemetry - if properly connected to the pax then its as good as a nurse/doctor/paramedic taking the observations.
Third would of course be Medlink.
Finally don't forget to ask the pax - they may actually know what's wrong with them, as may the travelling companions. Too often people call ambulances without asking the patient if they are actually ill!
PS. If you call an emergency ambulance to meet your flight PLEASE keep all the pax sat down in their seats until the ambulance crew are on board - its very difficult fighting your way through 300 people all trying to go the opposite way to you! Those of us who work at the airports regularly are aware of turnaround times and customer service issues particular to airlines and will make every effort to let you carry on as normal asap.
PW
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Camelot
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It is the cabin crews decision to ask for medlink assistance and the captain should do as they ask.
Sounds like the tail trying to wag the dog again!It's hard to pass fair judgement without all the facts, but I find it hard to believe that anyone would deny contact with Medlink unless they had GOOD cause.
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Blackburn
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Having used medlink a number of times myself in the same company as Shadowpurser, indeed many of the flight crew were unwilling to use the facility provided by medlink and asked us repeatedly to pa for a Dr on board first.
However the correct procedure taught to the crew was, at the time, to contact medlink first who would then advise if a Dr on board was a necessity or there was something the crew could do, depending on the nature of the incident of course.
Warlock2000 re your comments. When was the last time a flight crew member came out of the flight deck to assess a medical situation that has arisen on board and suggested a course of action? I can't recall it ever happening, that is one of the reasons cabin crew are on board.
If through our rigorous avmed training, we as cabin crew consider that contacting medlink is a neccessity, then the flight crew should contact medlink where possible, without discussion. We are not trying to tell them what to do, simply asking them to connect us to people on the ground for advice we feel is necessary.
If during the flight the Capt or FO asked us to take a look outside D3L and see if everything was okay, we would do it because we have faith in their abilities and believe they know what they are talking about. We wouldn't suggest they pa to see if we have an engineer on board first would we?
However the correct procedure taught to the crew was, at the time, to contact medlink first who would then advise if a Dr on board was a necessity or there was something the crew could do, depending on the nature of the incident of course.
Warlock2000 re your comments. When was the last time a flight crew member came out of the flight deck to assess a medical situation that has arisen on board and suggested a course of action? I can't recall it ever happening, that is one of the reasons cabin crew are on board.
If through our rigorous avmed training, we as cabin crew consider that contacting medlink is a neccessity, then the flight crew should contact medlink where possible, without discussion. We are not trying to tell them what to do, simply asking them to connect us to people on the ground for advice we feel is necessary.
If during the flight the Capt or FO asked us to take a look outside D3L and see if everything was okay, we would do it because we have faith in their abilities and believe they know what they are talking about. We wouldn't suggest they pa to see if we have an engineer on board first would we?
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I also find it hard to believe any Captain would deny a request from the CS to contact Medlink unless there are good operational reasons for not doing so. I have found Medlink very useful on several occasions and they have most certainly saved me from at least one diversion.
However, it would seem prudent to see if there are any medically qualified personnel on board who would be better able to communicate symptoms to Medlink. I certainly would insist on the crew exploring this avenue before contacting Medlink, it does not take more than a few seconds to establish if you have a willing qualified individual on board and it just seems to me to be a common sense first port of call. You then may have access to the Doctors kit and it could end up saving a life, which is after all the object of the exercise!
Having said all of the above the Captain is the line manager and if in his/her judgment it is not feasible to contact Medlink then that is the Captains call not the Cabin Supervisors. I would hope the Captain would communicate the reasons to the CS of course.
Prs777 the reason you would look out the window if asked by your Captain is because he is your boss for the day. You are required to obey all his/her lawful commands by law! That said airline operations are a team sport and we should be working together to resolve these sorts of problems. There may have been a good operational reason for Captain to deny such a request but as I have already said one would hope the Captain would have communicated his/her reasons to the CS.
However, it would seem prudent to see if there are any medically qualified personnel on board who would be better able to communicate symptoms to Medlink. I certainly would insist on the crew exploring this avenue before contacting Medlink, it does not take more than a few seconds to establish if you have a willing qualified individual on board and it just seems to me to be a common sense first port of call. You then may have access to the Doctors kit and it could end up saving a life, which is after all the object of the exercise!
Having said all of the above the Captain is the line manager and if in his/her judgment it is not feasible to contact Medlink then that is the Captains call not the Cabin Supervisors. I would hope the Captain would communicate the reasons to the CS of course.
Prs777 the reason you would look out the window if asked by your Captain is because he is your boss for the day. You are required to obey all his/her lawful commands by law! That said airline operations are a team sport and we should be working together to resolve these sorts of problems. There may have been a good operational reason for Captain to deny such a request but as I have already said one would hope the Captain would have communicated his/her reasons to the CS.
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Blackburn
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Kinsman, yup your right, the captain is my boss for the day, but you missed the point I was trying to make.
If our SOP's state that Medlink must be contacted first, then why does the captain feel it necessary to change that? What other SOP's does he feel like changing?
Not all cabin crew are under the delusion that they are in command of the aircraft, but I wish that the flight crew would stop being so bloody paranoid about cabin crew.
By reiterating in your post that basically cabin crew should do as we are told goes against everything that CRM has been trying to get around for years and I feel it has no place in todays airlines. Captains are part of the team on board, we all work together and those that don't work in the team stand out a mile and IMHO should be managed out the business.
Oh and by the way, I would do as the Captain or FO asked, because he asked me to do it ...
If our SOP's state that Medlink must be contacted first, then why does the captain feel it necessary to change that? What other SOP's does he feel like changing?
Not all cabin crew are under the delusion that they are in command of the aircraft, but I wish that the flight crew would stop being so bloody paranoid about cabin crew.
By reiterating in your post that basically cabin crew should do as we are told goes against everything that CRM has been trying to get around for years and I feel it has no place in todays airlines. Captains are part of the team on board, we all work together and those that don't work in the team stand out a mile and IMHO should be managed out the business.
Oh and by the way, I would do as the Captain or FO asked, because he asked me to do it ...
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: uk
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If a pap is having a suspected heart attack then trying to call for help using HF as a medium would only hasten their demise.
However a cardiac surgeon in seat 3C would, in my view, be an excellent (C) resource (M).
However a cardiac surgeon in seat 3C would, in my view, be an excellent (C) resource (M).
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Camp X-Ray
Posts: 2,135
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Psr777 - unfortunately many cabin crew SOPs in BA have been developed entirely without flight crew input, which in a number of instances has led to false expectations about what can and can't be done in flight. The example of contacting Medlink from one of our short haul aircraft is a case in point. This shortcoming has been identified by the CAA and currently there's something of a shake-up going in in cabin crew training to produce a co-ordinated approach to events on the aircraft. From an entirely personal point of view I would suggest you call for a doctor immediately that a passenger is taken ill, rather than follow the dogma of contacting Medlink first. We can call Medlink whilst you're doing that, but its far better to have a doctor on the scene than a one at the end of a radio.
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Abroad
Posts: 520
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Handsolo, I gather that the "corporate strategy" is to offload as much liability as possible hence the decision to always call Medlink. I gather you are expected to call them if a pax is taken ill before boarding too.
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Camelot
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Psr777.
You seem to be missing the point. I say again, I find it hard to believe that any Captain would deny the crew contacting Medlink unless he/she had good cause.
Comments and attitudes like "it is the cabin crews decision to ask for medlink assistance and the captain should do as they ask" certainly do nothing for CRM as at times things up front are not always as easy as they might appear. Instead of getting your t!ts in a tangle, have you ever taken the time after the flight to ask the Captain the reason for his/her decision?
Great, now run along and get me that cup-a-tea!
You seem to be missing the point. I say again, I find it hard to believe that any Captain would deny the crew contacting Medlink unless he/she had good cause.
Comments and attitudes like "it is the cabin crews decision to ask for medlink assistance and the captain should do as they ask" certainly do nothing for CRM as at times things up front are not always as easy as they might appear. Instead of getting your t!ts in a tangle, have you ever taken the time after the flight to ask the Captain the reason for his/her decision?
Oh and by the way, I would do as the Captain or FO asked, because he asked me to do it ...
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Camp X-Ray
Posts: 2,135
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Maxy - if a passenger is taken ill before boarding then I shall be offloading as much liability as possible by not allowing them to come anywhere near the aircraft! If they've not crossed the threshold then they're the ground staffs responsibility, not mine. They can phone Medlink!
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Blackburn
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Warlock2000 :
"and how do you take that..... orally?"
I do get your point, seriously. The unfortunate thing is that the SOP's are devised without proper input from the people they affect, hopefully it will improve.
However,
In so far as things up front not being as easy as they might appear, granted, I would not presume to think any different. I have first hand experience and have great respect for the guys and gals in charge of the plane.
I rarely get my "t!its in a tangle" and regularly ask my line managers (whoever they are on the day) for feedback so I can greater understand the situation, its outcome and how to do it better next time. I also give feedback on situations to let line managers (whoever they are on the day) know how they can greater assist next time. I know my limitations, but I also know what I am good at.
Not all medical situations need the attention of a qualified Dr or Nurse. Some can be solved by simply using Medlink. Quite rightly maxy101 pointed out that they assume all liability once they are contacted, which is probably why BA insist you contact them first.
I only have experience using Medlink on East -West Long Haul services, not on short haul, so cannot comment on that.
And whilst you may find it hard to believe that any Captain would deny contacting Medlink unless they had good cause, it HAS happened. One Captain refused to use Medlink as he thought it was a waste of company money......he thought BA paid every time a call was put through, he did not know it was a yearly rate.
I asked him his reasons during the flight, didn't bother to wait until we landed.
If any medical situation arises that needs urgent medical attention, of course we would PA for a doctor immediately, it is the times when we are unsure that we tend to use Medlink....which is why it is there surely?
"and how do you take that..... orally?"
I do get your point, seriously. The unfortunate thing is that the SOP's are devised without proper input from the people they affect, hopefully it will improve.
However,
Comments and attitudes like "it is the cabin crews decision to ask for medlink assistance and the captain should do as they ask" certainly do nothing for CRM as at times things up front are not always as easy as they might appear. Instead of getting your t!ts in a tangle, have you ever taken the time after the flight to ask the Captain the reason for his/her decision?
I rarely get my "t!its in a tangle" and regularly ask my line managers (whoever they are on the day) for feedback so I can greater understand the situation, its outcome and how to do it better next time. I also give feedback on situations to let line managers (whoever they are on the day) know how they can greater assist next time. I know my limitations, but I also know what I am good at.
Not all medical situations need the attention of a qualified Dr or Nurse. Some can be solved by simply using Medlink. Quite rightly maxy101 pointed out that they assume all liability once they are contacted, which is probably why BA insist you contact them first.
I only have experience using Medlink on East -West Long Haul services, not on short haul, so cannot comment on that.
And whilst you may find it hard to believe that any Captain would deny contacting Medlink unless they had good cause, it HAS happened. One Captain refused to use Medlink as he thought it was a waste of company money......he thought BA paid every time a call was put through, he did not know it was a yearly rate.
I asked him his reasons during the flight, didn't bother to wait until we landed.
If any medical situation arises that needs urgent medical attention, of course we would PA for a doctor immediately, it is the times when we are unsure that we tend to use Medlink....which is why it is there surely?
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Psr777
If you were on one of my flights you would get my full support, as you are my eyes and ears in the cabin. However, SOP’s are there to be followed to avoid the need to brief, circumstances often dictate that a different course of action is more appropriate.
If your company SOP is to contact Medlink before a PA for medical assistance then I would suggest it has been written by someone with little or no practical experience. I can think of no occasion when a qualified medical eye is going to be less able to pass accurate information to Medlink.
CRM is not always about being warm and cuddly sometimes CRM means when in command take all available information into account and command!
If you were on one of my flights you would get my full support, as you are my eyes and ears in the cabin. However, SOP’s are there to be followed to avoid the need to brief, circumstances often dictate that a different course of action is more appropriate.
If your company SOP is to contact Medlink before a PA for medical assistance then I would suggest it has been written by someone with little or no practical experience. I can think of no occasion when a qualified medical eye is going to be less able to pass accurate information to Medlink.
CRM is not always about being warm and cuddly sometimes CRM means when in command take all available information into account and command!
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: on the golf course (Covid permitting)
Posts: 2,131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Working for the same company as Shadowpurser etc, my experience of Medlink is very positive - if only for reassurance etc.
On the shorthaul fleet though, a lot of aircraft have no HF comms so all you are left with is ACARS, with about 120 characters of message space which makes it very difficult to compose meaningfully. Then it takes up to 45 mins for a reply. I literally spent about half a flight from LHR to IST on ACARS to Medlink - waste of time, much better to throw it at the deck it the problem deteriorates.
On longhaul aircraft most have Satcom facilities (or at least twin HF with Speedbird London on call to patch through). The satcom facility is excellent (albeit v expensive) and you're straight through to Medlink. I have used it several times and never have I seen it refused when the cc decide it is necessary - it costs nothing (fixed annual subscription). Have also got the cc member to do the talking to complete the loop - also very useful experience for them. Recognise however on a flight from NRT to LHR (for example) that even a life threatening scenario on board will probably not result in a diversion - EVER. In certain parts of the world there aren't satisfactory ground facilities to help the patient, and you're better of in the air travelling at 600mph towards somewhere better equipped.
So my take is that on LH Medlink should never be denied when requested, just beware of our often limited options. On SH it is of much less use.
BTW, don't expect any on-board doctor to be allowed on the FD to speak directly to Medlink!
On the shorthaul fleet though, a lot of aircraft have no HF comms so all you are left with is ACARS, with about 120 characters of message space which makes it very difficult to compose meaningfully. Then it takes up to 45 mins for a reply. I literally spent about half a flight from LHR to IST on ACARS to Medlink - waste of time, much better to throw it at the deck it the problem deteriorates.
On longhaul aircraft most have Satcom facilities (or at least twin HF with Speedbird London on call to patch through). The satcom facility is excellent (albeit v expensive) and you're straight through to Medlink. I have used it several times and never have I seen it refused when the cc decide it is necessary - it costs nothing (fixed annual subscription). Have also got the cc member to do the talking to complete the loop - also very useful experience for them. Recognise however on a flight from NRT to LHR (for example) that even a life threatening scenario on board will probably not result in a diversion - EVER. In certain parts of the world there aren't satisfactory ground facilities to help the patient, and you're better of in the air travelling at 600mph towards somewhere better equipped.
So my take is that on LH Medlink should never be denied when requested, just beware of our often limited options. On SH it is of much less use.
BTW, don't expect any on-board doctor to be allowed on the FD to speak directly to Medlink!