Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner)
Reload this Page >

Airbus forsees demand for 25,000 aircraft in the next 20 years

Wikiposts
Search
Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner) If you're not a professional pilot but want to discuss issues about the job, this is the best place to loiter. You won't be moved on by 'security' and there'll be plenty of experts to answer any questions.

Airbus forsees demand for 25,000 aircraft in the next 20 years

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 23rd Sep 2009, 11:32
  #21 (permalink)  
Nemo Me Impune Lacessit
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Derbyshire, England.
Posts: 4,091
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
McDonnell Douglas bought Boeing with Boeing's money now MD's senior management is calling the shots. The proof is the 787 which is a colossal disaster. The company who did the electrical on the A380 which caused all their delays is the sole supplier for the 787 just one example and they keep blaming it on the strike???
Were you retrenched, did you just leave or were you sacked?
parabellum is offline  
Old 23rd Sep 2009, 12:08
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Surely a starting point for assessing the accuracy of such forecasts as these would be the predictor's forecasts for the last, say, 20 years? Accepting (relatively) short term variances, eg 2002/3, have they predicted the overall trend correctly or not?
MikeAlphaTangoTango is offline  
Old 23rd Sep 2009, 13:02
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Canadian Shield
Posts: 538
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As the Chinese sage said............"WE'll SEE."

That said, just last week flew MSP to Dallas on a truly ancient DC-9-30. The return leg was a brand new CRJ900. Which one was quieter and more comfortable???? Yup, you guessed it.
er340790 is offline  
Old 23rd Sep 2009, 20:25
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Seattle, Washington USA
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I still work there. When I hired in 20 years ago I was proud to be an employee, now I pray there is enough company left to retire from. I am currently working the SOB fix for the 787. This program scares me 787.
Blowchowski is offline  
Old 23rd Sep 2009, 22:28
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: in the magical land of beer and chocolates
Age: 52
Posts: 506
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I still work there. When I hired in 20 years ago I was proud to be an employee, now I pray there is enough company left to retire from. I am currently working the SOB fix for the 787. This program scares me 787.
With all due respect but if you're still employed at B , maybe you shouldn't be commenting so negatively on an open Forum as big as this one about such an important high profile project as the 787 sleepliner.

Making it to your pension might become even more of a challenge I think.
kbrockman is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2009, 09:48
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: brindisi
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
25.000 ?

Sure in their dreams !!!
mistral_e is offline  
Old 25th Sep 2009, 15:04
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Cheshire
Age: 76
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And what I also read last week is that the major oil companys have been spending some of their non-earned billions on some high tech exploration, and have made some spectacular discoveries running into billions of barrels, which have turned all previous estimate on their head. So I suspect fossil fuels will be with us for a long time yet. How and if that will have an effect on aviation - and climate change - remains to be seen.
woodpidgeonr is offline  
Old 28th Sep 2009, 20:00
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: DUBAI
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oil discoveries

The three tar sands in Canada have over 17 trillion barrels of oil. Not estimated, measured...it's right there above ground. Cost of extraction is another matter. As long as OPEC keeps wanting to jack the prices and technology keeps making it cheaper to extract the oil from the tar sands we mightbe able to keep them flying for a while longer.
CAT II is offline  
Old 29th Sep 2009, 17:16
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Cheshire
Age: 76
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
According to what I read they are doing just the opposite. Apparently they are drilling several miles down and in the 3 places they have tried so far they have hit huge quantities of crude in each place, but I suspect it doesn't come cheap. It might start putting a bit of pressure on OPEC tho'
woodpidgeonr is offline  
Old 30th Sep 2009, 00:32
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Eish & Izent
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Personally... I think Tupperware won't do it for me

Last edited by Bartholomew; 30th Sep 2009 at 01:00. Reason: typo
Bartholomew is offline  
Old 30th Sep 2009, 11:51
  #31 (permalink)  
Bear Behind
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Yerp
Posts: 350
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Surely a starting point for assessing the accuracy of such forecasts as these would be the predictor's forecasts for the last, say, 20 years? Accepting (relatively) short term variances, eg 2002/3, have they predicted the overall trend correctly or not?
No. They have not.

Thay have a great history of underestimating the demand.
panda-k-bear is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.