Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner) If you're not a professional pilot but want to discuss issues about the job, this is the best place to loiter. You won't be moved on by 'security' and there'll be plenty of experts to answer any questions.

Interesting Boeing Patent

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 29th January 2005 | 15:07
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 844
Likes: 0
From: USA
Looks like the ambulance chasing lawyers came up with this one.
This industry use to be fun, now its a dog eat dog world.
Earl is offline  
Old 29th January 2005 | 15:53
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 887
Likes: 0
From: UK
I shall soon be patenting the one row/no aisle concept. This will allow for shorter (albeit wider) aircraft, more legroom, easier access to passengers for the cabin staff and only one window on each side. I shall leave someone else to sort out the aerodynamics, but an exceedingly high aspect ratio flying wing might be a good starting point.
Zoom is offline  
Old 29th January 2005 | 19:35
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,389
Likes: 0
From: England
How on earth did they get that patent through? The main claim seems to be the use of 2 isles on a "small" plane. That has to be an obvious extension of existing art.
cwatters is offline  
Old 31st January 2005 | 15:17
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 492
Likes: 0
From: the edge of madness
In the very early days of the A320, I seem to remember Airbus showing a twin-aisle config for business. I think there was a single seat in the middle with an aisle either side so you could have both elbows smashed by the carts instead of just one. Doesn't appear to have caught on - funnily enough.
Torquelink is offline  
Old 31st January 2005 | 15:29
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 3,040
Likes: 0
From: 58-33N. 00-18W. Peterborough UK
cwatters. 'How on Earth did they get the Patent through……?

I'm baffled too. I've had several US Patents issued and if Airbus challenged this one, on the basis of 'obvious, no real inventive steps', I'm sure they could blow it out of the water in days.

Awful lot of paperwork there for a squashed 'toob'.
forget is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.