Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner) If you're not a professional pilot but want to discuss issues about the job, this is the best place to loiter. You won't be moved on by 'security' and there'll be plenty of experts to answer any questions.

Interesting Boeing Patent

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 28th January 2005 | 17:48
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
From: Was Rhoose Regional
Interesting Boeing Patent

Just stumbled across this on the Boeing website. Could this be their vision of the regional jet market?

Click here
speedbird_heavy is offline  
Old 28th January 2005 | 18:58
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
From: Mostly FL360-380, M0.78
What you see is the patent for Boeings 2+3+2 cabin layout ..

This patent is most likely for the aircraft that will some day replace the 737NG and be build on the experience gathered from the 7E7 programme.

The patent will prevent Airbus from following Boeing and develop a twin isle 2+3+2 seat 737/A320 category aircraft
Jetavia is offline  
Old 28th January 2005 | 19:18
  #3 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 1999
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 27,399
Likes: 857
From: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
So it's a sort of '13 inches narrower than the A310' design, is it?

Pretty revolutionary, huh?

Could do better if tried.
BEagle is online now  
Old 28th January 2005 | 19:33
  #4 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Aviation Qualifications: CPL
Posts: 2,787
Likes: 208
From: Toronto
Patent Pending

The name of the game is:

max bums/cabin area

Minimising aisle area/bum is one means to accomplish this.

I am preparing a patent that will place each bum with cabin baggage in a module with prepackaged meals, drinks and snacks that will then be automatically stacked into the cabin.

As each module is stacked, it will autoconnect to air and data services.

Multi-unit modules will be available for couples, families etc.

TSA will be much excited by the prospect of sealing the occupants into a module where they can do no mischief. The only security check needed will be for explosives which can be automatically detected by sampling the air from the module and diverting suspicious modules to the authorities.

That's after I figure out how to manage visits to the toilet
RatherBeFlying is online now  
Old 28th January 2005 | 19:38
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
From: Here. Over here.
I'm surprised that they didn't patent having pilot seats on the flight deck too. That would fix the competion!
They will want to patent having wings on aircraft next.
Desert Dingo is offline  
Old 28th January 2005 | 20:23
  #6 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,540
Likes: 3
From: UK
So if you can patent something like this, can I patent the 2 x table please

What a pathetic effort to hamper a competitor who is riding roughshod over you!!

Why not patent the idea of carrying passengers, that would be a real disadvantage for all competitors!!
surely not is offline  
Old 28th January 2005 | 20:35
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
From: Mostly FL360-380, M0.78
Any interesting patents held by airbus??

The patents are there for a reason, not to have anyone rib of your ideas, designs etc. However some patents are just to craizy like doctors wanting to patent the human DNA for instance..
Jetavia is offline  
Old 28th January 2005 | 21:27
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 555
Likes: 0
From: Fantasy Island
I believe Airbus hold the patents for this.

Much more exciting.
BahrainLad is offline  
Old 28th January 2005 | 21:50
  #9 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 808
Likes: 0
From: Scotland
RbF,
If you can devise a good autofeed system, no doubt in my mind you can do an equally effective autovac (autoevacuate?). Just remember to build in the autoairfreshener. ;-)
broadreach
broadreach is offline  
Old 28th January 2005 | 23:42
  #10 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Aviation Qualifications: CPL
Posts: 2,787
Likes: 208
From: Toronto
BR

I expect Martin-Baker will be interested in supplying a rocket and parachute for the modules.

Adding an escape system to a buoyant module will remove the bother with slides and rafts.
RatherBeFlying is online now  
Old 29th January 2005 | 01:00
  #11 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 288
Likes: 9
From: Oz
Dingo,

I think the real interest in this area is from the airline managers who would like to patent a cockpit with no pilots seats. With no pilots, more accountants could be employed, and the airline surely more profitable !!

Oz2

Australia2 is offline  
Old 29th January 2005 | 02:58
  #12 (permalink)  
swh

Eidolon
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 2,244
Likes: 62
From: Some hole
Looks like a 328Jet...

With the exception...they say ...

"A single isle configuration used in these current aeroplanes in these smaller classes minimizes drag, weight, fuel burn, and economic penalties"

So they put forward a twin isle jet, which is uneconomical on the basis it will have pax appeal?

For 90 seats, they would be operating on thin routes..economics would be they key.

swh is offline  
Old 29th January 2005 | 06:02
  #13 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 517
Likes: 37
From: Kelowna Wine Country
Maybe there are other reasons they are pursuing this just now.

It is easier and cheaper to make Al frames circular, however now we are into Resin and fibre the frames will be made in molds, will cost about the same for either shape.

Building in fibre, internal bulkheads can be molded into the frames to support the pressure inside across the flat area (while a circular fuselage does it naturally.)

Could be used to improve ground clearance or stance ( like flattened engine cowlings?)

May have areodynamic ramifications too, particularly in nose high attitudes?
ChrisVJ is offline  
Old 29th January 2005 | 08:01
  #14 (permalink)  
Evo
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,650
Likes: 0
From: Chichester, UK
The patent will prevent Airbus from following Boeing and develop a twin isle 2+3+2 seat 737/A320 category aircraft
One of the requirements under US Patent law is that the inventive step is not obvious. Now, unless there are some weasel words in the depths of the patent (I only read the abstract and summary, and skimmed the rest), the idea of making the cabin a bit wider to allow 2+3+2 rather than 3+3 seems hard to defend as a non-obvious solution to a problem.
Evo is offline  
Old 29th January 2005 | 08:40
  #15 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,488
Likes: 35
From: Hong Kong
Should have no aisles - forcing the passengers to crawl over the seats. And reduce leg room further...cut off the legs below the knee. And make the cabin lower.....
Load Toad is offline  
Old 29th January 2005 | 09:41
  #16 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
From: Was Rhoose Regional
Should have no aisles - forcing the passengers to crawl over the seats. And reduce leg room further...cut off the legs below the knee. And make the cabin lower.....
Isn't that standard practice with the charter airlines?
speedbird_heavy is offline  
Old 29th January 2005 | 11:35
  #17 (permalink)  
The Aquatone Article
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
From: London
"One of the requirements under US Patent law is that the inventive step is not obvious". (Evo).

Obviously another requirement is that it should be in the national interest.

I bet a pound to a cent that if I'd pitched up with a patent application supported by those fag-packet drawings they would have arrested me, removed my shoes and trouser belt, and called Homeland Security.
Thunderball 2 is offline  
Old 29th January 2005 | 11:39
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
From: Europe
I heard that Boeing is patenting the pigstrap seatbelt. Then the Europians will be out of the US marked for good.
Charles Darwin is offline  
Old 29th January 2005 | 14:08
  #19 (permalink)  
The Cooler King
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,717
Likes: 30
From: Europe
I think Lego brought out a model like this one when I was a kid!
Farrell is offline  
Old 29th January 2005 | 14:32
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
From: temporarily unsure :-)
that is interesting indeed that they patented it!
RUDAS is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.