Q-400's at Osaka
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Q-400's at Osaka
First time posting on pprune...hello!
Looking for info on the Q-400's out of Osaka. I already checked out the Hawaii Aviaiton website. Just looking for rumors, hiring info, and advice. Currently, I'm an F/O at a regional and wondering if it's worth the switch...I wouldn't mind hanging out in Osaka (Okonomiyaki/hot chicks) rather than being "bored" in the midwest and freezing my a-$ off.
Thanks in advance...
Oyasumi
Looking for info on the Q-400's out of Osaka. I already checked out the Hawaii Aviaiton website. Just looking for rumors, hiring info, and advice. Currently, I'm an F/O at a regional and wondering if it's worth the switch...I wouldn't mind hanging out in Osaka (Okonomiyaki/hot chicks) rather than being "bored" in the midwest and freezing my a-$ off.
Thanks in advance...
Oyasumi
Moderate, Modest & Mild.
You rang?
G'day Stereolab. To the best of my knowledge the jobs here in Osaka, on the Dash, are for Captains only - that means you will need to be able to prove that you have been flying in the lhs, as a commander, and have somewhere around 2-3 years worth of lhs time before you'll be considered.
I understand that they (Alpha Wing - an All Nippon Airlines..ANA..subsidiary) have employed around 10 or so gaijin to date, mainly from Europe (so the cabin crew we were talking with thought).
It's still pretty cold here - it was snowing last week - so my advice is to get your cold @ss into the lhs asap.
I found out that co-pilot time isn't worth a pinch of salt, regardless of total time and previous type experience. Get yourself on to the left side, then the world is your oyster.
G'day Stereolab. To the best of my knowledge the jobs here in Osaka, on the Dash, are for Captains only - that means you will need to be able to prove that you have been flying in the lhs, as a commander, and have somewhere around 2-3 years worth of lhs time before you'll be considered.
I understand that they (Alpha Wing - an All Nippon Airlines..ANA..subsidiary) have employed around 10 or so gaijin to date, mainly from Europe (so the cabin crew we were talking with thought).
It's still pretty cold here - it was snowing last week - so my advice is to get your cold @ss into the lhs asap.
I found out that co-pilot time isn't worth a pinch of salt, regardless of total time and previous type experience. Get yourself on to the left side, then the world is your oyster.
Last edited by Kaptin M; 18th Feb 2004 at 12:22.
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: In a lot of different Hotels
Posts: 70
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Kaptin m
Tried to send you a pm but the mail box is full.
I am also trying for ANA I have about 500 in th lhs of the dash none in the right and about 2 years worth in the lhs of a brasilia with 5100 tt ,31 yo and keen as mustard.
This meets the minimin but do u know if it is really enough to be given a second thought.
cheers
Tried to send you a pm but the mail box is full.
I am also trying for ANA I have about 500 in th lhs of the dash none in the right and about 2 years worth in the lhs of a brasilia with 5100 tt ,31 yo and keen as mustard.
This meets the minimin but do u know if it is really enough to be given a second thought.
cheers
Moderate, Modest & Mild.
"keen as mustard....I suspect that that is the primary trait the recruiting company and the airline interviewers will be seeking, once you`ve met the minimums, splat. So I would go ahead and lodge my application even if you don`t meet the minimums right now (sorry, I don`t know what they were looking at), as I believe there will be a growing requirement for foreign pilots, in this country over the next 2-3 years, due to the high retirement rate.
What are your thoughts on flying with Japanese pilots?. They are congenial, and trained very well in their company procedures, Shags - however having said that, I find that most of the F/O`s have a fairly standard set of "add-ons", which when queried why, the reply is invariably "some (Japanese) Captains like to do it that way"
My understanding of the reason for SOP`s was precisely that - to have standard operating procedures.
As is ingrained in the Japanese culture, everything has a set format (eg. the pre-flight briefing of the Cabin Crew) - like a tea ceremony.
Manipulatively, as in any cross section of a group, there is a variation within lower and upper limits.
Gambatte!
What are your thoughts on flying with Japanese pilots?. They are congenial, and trained very well in their company procedures, Shags - however having said that, I find that most of the F/O`s have a fairly standard set of "add-ons", which when queried why, the reply is invariably "some (Japanese) Captains like to do it that way"
My understanding of the reason for SOP`s was precisely that - to have standard operating procedures.
As is ingrained in the Japanese culture, everything has a set format (eg. the pre-flight briefing of the Cabin Crew) - like a tea ceremony.
Manipulatively, as in any cross section of a group, there is a variation within lower and upper limits.
Gambatte!
Moderate, Modest & Mild.
To the best of my knowledge, schroeder, the vacancies were for Captains only. I`ll try to make contact with some of the guys and see if they can answer your questions directly on this forum.
Moderate, Modest & Mild.
Sorry guys, I have given you wrong information.
Apparently the vacancies are for F/O's as well as Captains.
Preference is given to pilots with Q400 time, however as there isn't an abundance of these pilots available, 300 or Saab time, followed by time on glass/turbine types is acceptable.
Apologies for the bum steer.
Agencies are PARC and HACS.
Apparently the vacancies are for F/O's as well as Captains.
Preference is given to pilots with Q400 time, however as there isn't an abundance of these pilots available, 300 or Saab time, followed by time on glass/turbine types is acceptable.
Apologies for the bum steer.
Agencies are PARC and HACS.
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: europe
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
q400
sorry guys,
have to query again:
do I need pic time to apply for FO position on q400? is this a Japanase CAA (JCAB) requirement? I have already q400 time.
hope somebody might find out, Kaptin M probably?
so long,
schroeder
have to query again:
do I need pic time to apply for FO position on q400? is this a Japanase CAA (JCAB) requirement? I have already q400 time.
hope somebody might find out, Kaptin M probably?
so long,
schroeder
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Kaptim M,
First off, thanks for the replies. The positions I'm refering to are the Q400 f/o and ca slots offered by Hawaii Aviation...sounds like from your comments "Alpha Wing" does direct hiring...you mentioned most newhires were from Europe (I'm a Yankee)...
I was puzzled by your comments on pic time for an f/o slot...that seems very unusual...unless they are counting on furloughed pilots from the states to fill these postions.
So I guess my question is, are they hiring only a few f/o's or are they looking at hiring a lot? And are you refering to Hawaii Aviation as the point of contact for hiring? I also know they are looking at aquiring CRJ's as well.
Thanks again for the carifications...
Stereo...
First off, thanks for the replies. The positions I'm refering to are the Q400 f/o and ca slots offered by Hawaii Aviation...sounds like from your comments "Alpha Wing" does direct hiring...you mentioned most newhires were from Europe (I'm a Yankee)...
I was puzzled by your comments on pic time for an f/o slot...that seems very unusual...unless they are counting on furloughed pilots from the states to fill these postions.
So I guess my question is, are they hiring only a few f/o's or are they looking at hiring a lot? And are you refering to Hawaii Aviation as the point of contact for hiring? I also know they are looking at aquiring CRJ's as well.
Thanks again for the carifications...
Stereo...
Moderate, Modest & Mild.
Stereo and schroeder - might I suggest that the BEST source for your info would be the agencies - PARC and HACS.
To date, I have had no contact with any of the Alpha Wing pilots, my info has come from a couple of F/A`s with that company, one of the PARC managers, and Japanese pilots with another Japanese company.
I understand that there are now some Canadians, as well as the Europeans.
I do NOT believe (according to the Japanese pilots I have asked, and the PARC rep) that commmand time is a requirement for an F/O slot, by either JCAB or ANA. Regardless of the licence you hold, you will be issued a full Japanese licence (at the completion of training) - not a validation of any existing licence, which usually entails doing only an Air Law exam and medical.
The Japanese system entails several exams, a simulator and line checks by JCAB, for licence issue, and basically a full ground school and sim course on the aircraft, even if already rated.
The original number of 10 that I cited in an earlier post is now apparently "considerably" more.
Again, until I can get some time off, back in Osaka and make contact with the Gaijin in Alpha Wing, I am only passing on 2nd and 3rd hand info.
PARC and/or HACS will be able to far better inform you than I of the requirements.
It would be unusual, Stereolab, that ANA would be direct hiring.
If you have 400 time, either as a co-pilot, or a captain, my understanding is you would be in a prime seat if you`re interested in this job.
To date, I have had no contact with any of the Alpha Wing pilots, my info has come from a couple of F/A`s with that company, one of the PARC managers, and Japanese pilots with another Japanese company.
I understand that there are now some Canadians, as well as the Europeans.
I do NOT believe (according to the Japanese pilots I have asked, and the PARC rep) that commmand time is a requirement for an F/O slot, by either JCAB or ANA. Regardless of the licence you hold, you will be issued a full Japanese licence (at the completion of training) - not a validation of any existing licence, which usually entails doing only an Air Law exam and medical.
The Japanese system entails several exams, a simulator and line checks by JCAB, for licence issue, and basically a full ground school and sim course on the aircraft, even if already rated.
The original number of 10 that I cited in an earlier post is now apparently "considerably" more.
Again, until I can get some time off, back in Osaka and make contact with the Gaijin in Alpha Wing, I am only passing on 2nd and 3rd hand info.
PARC and/or HACS will be able to far better inform you than I of the requirements.
It would be unusual, Stereolab, that ANA would be direct hiring.
If you have 400 time, either as a co-pilot, or a captain, my understanding is you would be in a prime seat if you`re interested in this job.
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Antipodes & ....
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As other posters have suggested, it would be best to check the websites of the respective crewing companies to get up-to-date information.
To the best of my knowledge (and in accordance with other advice here on Pprune) there are two crewing agencies - HACS (Hawaii Aviation Contract Services - Contact: Mike Lee) and PARC (contact: Jacquie Breslin). The urls are:
HACS (Hawaii Aviation) and PARC Aviation .
HACS still have an advertisment (with full details of required experience) on their site, however PARC are not actively recruiting for the positions now (although this may change sometime down the track). If you wish to contact Jacquie Breslin at PARC, find a job posting with her name as a contact and email her.
Hope this helps - so far there has not been much feedback from crew already recruited for the contract, but maybe they would care to enlighten us if they get the time.
Fark!
To the best of my knowledge (and in accordance with other advice here on Pprune) there are two crewing agencies - HACS (Hawaii Aviation Contract Services - Contact: Mike Lee) and PARC (contact: Jacquie Breslin). The urls are:
HACS (Hawaii Aviation) and PARC Aviation .
HACS still have an advertisment (with full details of required experience) on their site, however PARC are not actively recruiting for the positions now (although this may change sometime down the track). If you wish to contact Jacquie Breslin at PARC, find a job posting with her name as a contact and email her.
Hope this helps - so far there has not been much feedback from crew already recruited for the contract, but maybe they would care to enlighten us if they get the time.
Fark!
Last edited by Farknel; 15th Mar 2004 at 01:59.
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: europe
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Q400
Thanks to Farknel and Kaptin M,
about PIC time: I already asked the agencies . They told me it is a JCAB requirement. Hard to belive and very strange. Therefore I asked this forum if this is very likely to be true. I am still in doubt...but how to ask JCAB? no link to them...so, hopefully somebody could find out !
thanks again fellows,
schroeder
about PIC time: I already asked the agencies . They told me it is a JCAB requirement. Hard to belive and very strange. Therefore I asked this forum if this is very likely to be true. I am still in doubt...but how to ask JCAB? no link to them...so, hopefully somebody could find out !
thanks again fellows,
schroeder
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yeah...the pic time for an F/O Q400 position seems odd.
Thanks again Kaptin M for answering our questions. Since I'm a "Yankee" I would most likely go through HACS.
Oyasumi Nasai
Thanks again Kaptin M for answering our questions. Since I'm a "Yankee" I would most likely go through HACS.
Oyasumi Nasai
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Canada
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hello everybody,for your info I am in Tokyo and met a few of the guys on the Q400 contract. They are Canadians,they are all F/O's
with no PIC time and they are their contracts are with Parc.
They are in Tokyo studying for the Japanese licence(air law,radio,
weather, etc.)
cheers
with no PIC time and they are their contracts are with Parc.
They are in Tokyo studying for the Japanese licence(air law,radio,
weather, etc.)
cheers
Join Date: Jan 1997
Location: UK
Posts: 7,737
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As these jobs are attracting attention from those new to the contract world in general and Japan in particular I'd like to make a suggestion.
It's probably a very opportune moment for veterans of contract work in Japan to pass on genuine examples of how long it takes to get on line within companies there. This may well be vitally important to you if your 'advertised' salary is based on actually being a productive line pilot. This has been a major stumbling block discussed on-line for the last 10 years that I know of.
Regards
Rob
It's probably a very opportune moment for veterans of contract work in Japan to pass on genuine examples of how long it takes to get on line within companies there. This may well be vitally important to you if your 'advertised' salary is based on actually being a productive line pilot. This has been a major stumbling block discussed on-line for the last 10 years that I know of.
Regards
Rob
Moderate, Modest & Mild.
From PARC, these are the requirements that ANA have given them, for candidates:-
Total Time : 2,500 hours (on anything)
PIC time: 1,500 (on anything)
Preference: min 500 hours operating on a 2-crew (preferably) turbo-prop aircraft.
Preferably: A command rating on type. Most countries (except Oz and N.Z.) issue you with only one rating when you are endorsed - that being a Command endorsement. In their infinite wisdom, Australia and N.Z. differentiate between a Captain (command) and a non-command (it used to be called a 2nd class rating) endorsement, according to PARC.
To respond to PPT - time from initial induction to "final checkout" is historically 7-4 months.
This involves a ground school that requires you to pass several subjects for your Japanese ATP, and Japanese Radio Operator's Licence.
Regardless of time on type, you will be required to do a full Ground school (and associated exams), fixed base, and motion on sim training, followed by a JCAB (and Company) sim check ride.
Line training will treat you as an ab initio - after all, flying in Japanese air is TOTALLY unlike the air anywhere else on this planet!! - and you can expect at least 1 (but maybe 2) JCAB check rides, followed by about an hour of questions.
Now whilst all of this might SOUND daunting
the Japanese are very thorough with their training, and one MUST assume that you will not be presented for a check unless the INSTRUCTOR has done his work properly.
Nevertheless, it IS a somewhat "draining" experience, and there is (in)occasionally the poor unfortunate who bombs out.
Total Time : 2,500 hours (on anything)
PIC time: 1,500 (on anything)
Preference: min 500 hours operating on a 2-crew (preferably) turbo-prop aircraft.
Preferably: A command rating on type. Most countries (except Oz and N.Z.) issue you with only one rating when you are endorsed - that being a Command endorsement. In their infinite wisdom, Australia and N.Z. differentiate between a Captain (command) and a non-command (it used to be called a 2nd class rating) endorsement, according to PARC.
To respond to PPT - time from initial induction to "final checkout" is historically 7-4 months.
This involves a ground school that requires you to pass several subjects for your Japanese ATP, and Japanese Radio Operator's Licence.
Regardless of time on type, you will be required to do a full Ground school (and associated exams), fixed base, and motion on sim training, followed by a JCAB (and Company) sim check ride.
Line training will treat you as an ab initio - after all, flying in Japanese air is TOTALLY unlike the air anywhere else on this planet!! - and you can expect at least 1 (but maybe 2) JCAB check rides, followed by about an hour of questions.
Now whilst all of this might SOUND daunting
the Japanese are very thorough with their training, and one MUST assume that you will not be presented for a check unless the INSTRUCTOR has done his work properly.Nevertheless, it IS a somewhat "draining" experience, and there is (in)occasionally the poor unfortunate who bombs out.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks for the replies and the added info...
Let's see if I understand this...
If you are hired by HACS or PARCS, you have to go through a ground school to convert your licences to the Japanese ATP? And after this do you start training in the Q400?
As I remember it, your training for the Q400 and your SIC checkride in the level "D" sim will convert your ratings to Japan standards. It seems a bit inefficient to go through a part 141 type of program to convert your ATP, then go through ground school after that for the Q400...
So I guess my question is...do you have to go through two training programs? One to convert your ratings and a second for actual training in the Q400?
Thanks in advanced!!!
Let's see if I understand this...
If you are hired by HACS or PARCS, you have to go through a ground school to convert your licences to the Japanese ATP? And after this do you start training in the Q400?
As I remember it, your training for the Q400 and your SIC checkride in the level "D" sim will convert your ratings to Japan standards. It seems a bit inefficient to go through a part 141 type of program to convert your ATP, then go through ground school after that for the Q400...
So I guess my question is...do you have to go through two training programs? One to convert your ratings and a second for actual training in the Q400?
Thanks in advanced!!!