Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Safety, CRM, QA & Emergency Response Planning A wide ranging forum for issues facing Aviation Professionals and Academics

HSI callouts for a visual approach?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 22nd June 2005 | 05:22
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,598
Likes: 11
From: Down south, USA.
Devil HSI callouts for a visual approach?

During approaches in good VMC, do many airlines require the non-flying pilot to state "Loc/glideslope alive" etc?

Because of the fact that we are required to have an instrument course set as a back-up for visual approaches, it has always seemed to me that if nobody verbalizes that the Loc course (although a VOR course can bring you towards the wrong parallel runway) is moving, then this back-up might go totally unnoticed. It does not hurt to arm the flight director and check it at 1,000', along with the gear handle (+lights) and flap indicator.

With closely spaced (CLE, DFW) parallels, a crew also could easily have the wrong course set in, especially when tower tells you to do a last-minute sidestep or other distractions happen as the crew is remembering to read the Landing checklist, or simply waiting for tower to give them a landing clearance.
Ignition Override is offline  
Old 22nd June 2005 | 14:09
  #2 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
From: Belgium
PNF callouts

It is SOP in my company to call out these LOC/VOR radial/pseudo vortac lines alive, as well as radio altimeter alive (mountaineous terrain). I think you're right. It should be like that. It is very surprising to see how easily pilots who almost never flew visually in their life can miss the runway during visual approaches. No PAPis? What should my height be at this range from threshold (called out by PNF)...?
Waspy is offline  
Old 24th June 2005 | 01:35
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 452
Likes: 0
From: In da north country
You should use the same procedures during a visual so you don't end up at the wrong airport! Happened many times!

you can loosen up a bit maybe on the all required call outs, but you still have to be prudent on all the really important stuff, i,e, LOC & GS for the correct airport. Have fun once in a while, but be carefull!
Willit Run is offline  
Old 25th June 2005 | 14:10
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 3
From: Arizona USA
Agreed.
Use callouts as necessary, otherwise you might end up like AA at SEA...landing on the taxiway.

Or, UAL, landing at the wrong airport altogether...
411A is offline  
Old 29th June 2005 | 13:20
  #5 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 4,698
Likes: 1,305
From: Australia
Probably a bit off the HSI call-outs discussion, but I have always preferred to select HSI mode when conducting an approach in a strong crosswind (visual or IMC). The larger "picture" of the localiser position with reference to the centre line allows for a faster appreciation of centre line tracking rather than the tiny localiser needle on the EADI. Horses for courses.
Centaurus is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.