PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Rumours & News (https://www.pprune.org/rumours-news-13/)
-   -   FlyBE Pilot Exodus! (https://www.pprune.org/rumours-news/74283-flybe-pilot-exodus.html)

oh BEhave 2nd December 2002 20:17

FlyBE Pilot Exodus!
 
While our post are being (re)moved with the speed of light, we keep on trying to get some info on the original tread.
Thanks for the info smokie. I managed to view it before the tread got moved seconds later!!!!
Anybody more info on how many pilots are leaving and from which bases?:eek: :eek: :eek:

2 BE or not 2 BE 2nd December 2002 20:23

It seems to me that about a dozen have resigned the last month from a couple of bases and I wouldn't be suprised if more followed shortly.

Not in BritAir 2nd December 2002 20:38

Yes, no, maybe...

I confirm?!:D :D :D

Raw Data 2nd December 2002 22:57

It's pretty obvious the person who started the topic deleted it, probably as it was about to get embarrassing for easyjet. Pity, it was warming up nicely!

I seem to recall that, with the removal from service of the CRJ, we needed to lose about 28 (might have been 23) pilots to avoid redundancies.

Therefore, the company has allowed people to leave with reduced notice periods in order to encourage a reduction in the pilot workforce- this being preferable to redundancies.

The point here is that the company is more than happy to see the people leave, as it saves them having to make redundant those who don't want to leave (ie most of us).

So, what could be perceived as a "flood" of resignations is, in fact, the best thing that could happen (from a financial point of view).

All the talk of "everybody trying to leave" is wishful thinking on some peoples' parts.

There was a lot of other bilge on the original thread, so let's not go there.

carlos vandango 2nd December 2002 23:48

so far I am hearing..3 from BHD CRJ, 1 BHD 146, 2 LGW 146, 3 EDI 146. Not a lot in the grand scheme of things but quite a few attending Orange tree hugging seminars. They're not all off to EZY so the market must be picking up a bit.;)

keepitlit 3rd December 2002 08:25

RD

Could you explain what is ment by" some people were only wishfully thinking".

Rgds

K.I.L.:confused:

crowndove 3rd December 2002 08:45

Raw data. please check the latest letter from Mike Wood to the CRJ pilots.
Bit of a different story...

Sensible Garage 3rd December 2002 09:08

RD check your data please, it's a bit raw
 
more than a few who wanted to leave had to sit out their 3 months and could not leave directly, apparently when the flood started to increase (I will not start about the tricks the company plays over the bonds to these people, oeps, I just did)

Carlos, some additions to your list : BHD is now 4 ex CRJ, BHX is losing 4 ex CRJ, wasn't EDI 4 ex 146? and believe the Channel Islands are losing a few also, don't forget we lost beside all this about 8 CRJ captains over the summer/autumn

AMEX 3rd December 2002 10:08

Couple of guys in the C.I have received calls from D. Darby in the past few weeks. Not for an interview but just to monitor their whereabouts and situation. Sure sounds like Flybe is preparing should they need to recruit.

puddle-jumper 3rd December 2002 10:10

FlyBe management need to stop thinking of the present and start looking at the future. The reason people are leaving now is because the market is picking up and they have somewhere else to go. Yes it make's it easier for them to leave without needing to give 3 months notice but when that deal ends do you really think it will stop the 'flood' ? Basically there will always be a certain percentage who are thinking of leaving, the difference now is that job they have been waiting for is becoming available, having to give 3 months notice is not going to stop them, just delay things a little.

For those of you who think I'm trying to scare the management into giving us a huge pay rise - think what you like. What is really going to P*%S me off is when we find ourselves short of pilots next year, the increased training costs are going to eat away at any profits and probably that huuuuuge pay rise too.:eek:

2 BE or not 2 BE 3rd December 2002 11:50

Puddle Jumper. I agree with you only partially. If the exodus continues and the company has to start training new pilots they’ll still have to do something to stop people from leaving.
And I guess a pay rise would certainly help to stop a lot of pilots from leaving???

It would also help I guess if the company didn’t think the future of the company is the Q400.
I’m sure it’s a great aircraft to fly and an awesome machine compared to the 200’s and 300’s.
But turboprop’s are not the future for a large regional carrier, the lack of speed, comfort, reliability and passenger appeal.
I know that seat/mile costs is a big thing in our company and that it is used to justify the use of the D8. But I often wonder if Exeter took into consideration that with a Jet one can simply do more sectors a day because it’s faster and thus increasing revenues.
I’m convinced that the D8 would make an excellent freighter, but scheduled airline ops???

oic 3rd December 2002 13:12

I believe there currently is a shortage of CRJ crew. Apparently, people have been offered CRJ courses. Meanwhile, somebody who is rated on the CRJ is doing a course for the dash, which does not make sense to me.

I believe that people are leaving because they are fed up with FlyBE. Salaries are way below the average, no payrise whatsoever - not even inflation - for years, frozen duty pay, no real career progression, etc.

These issues will have to be addressed soon.

If the company are changing the ration of TP versus JETs in favour of the turboprops, I reckon many people will leave simply because they are stuck on the dash without any real prospects of getting on a jet in the forseeable future.

excrab 3rd December 2002 13:22

2BE or not 2BE

Regarding your argument about turboprops and jets I'm not sure how valid it is. I believe that the q400 sector times from BHX to EDI ( for example ) are only about 5 minutes less than the 146, so given 8 sectors a day that only leaves you with an extra 40 minutes airborne time to earn more money - perhaps a BHX-MAN route might just be fitted in. Admittedly an Airbus or Boeing might gain more time but would require a huge investment in marketing to fill it, and marketing seems to have died down after the flurry in the summer.

If you want to get more sectors in on a network such as Flybe has the only way is to have a longer flying day - most flybe aircraft are back on the ground by 2100hrs. But to do that you need to attract passengers to fill them.

Don't get me wrong - I'd rather fly a jet and the way things are it looks like I might end up flying a Q400 instead but the problems are not just about aircraft types - management and marketing are the two words which spring to mind.

Raw Data 3rd December 2002 16:31

keepitlit

Simply that some people long for that story to come true, because they think it would result in a salary hike.

crowndove

Having read that letter, I see no conflict with what I said- remember that I was talking about the situation when resignations with reduced notice were first publicised. We have now had as many resignations as we required, so we now want to retain any on the CRJ fleet who want to stay. In fact, I think that letter states the situation well, and is a welcome piece of encouragement from management.

Sensible Garage

Obviously, as soon as it was clear that we would not have to make redundancies, the "early departure" scheme stopped. What did you expect to happen? The bond is a completely seperate issue, it is there to cover training costs- the company is quite within its rights to enforce the bond, the conditions of which you agreed with when you signed it. Allowing people to leave early was a concession to permit folk to take up other employment if they so desired. Prefer forced redundancies, would you?

AMEX

There are no current plans to recruit, apart from the Cabair cadets we have committed to.

puddle-jumper

The reason people are leaving now, is because 1) this is the usual time for the charter operators to hire for the summer; and 2) there is an ongoing opportunity with the low-cost carriers.

People will always move through an airline like flybe. There hasn't yet been a "flood", and I will bet money there won't be.

Training costs, well, sure there will be training costs when we hire again- but the cost of keeping crews sitting on their tods doing nothing for six months is fairly expensive too.

oic

There is CRJ course provisionally pencilled in for early in the new year. It is the course that was deferred in September. It is unlikely to proceed as we are unlikely to be flying the aircraft in the new year.

You may be fed up, but I doubt you speak for the majority. You are wrong in any case, I got my increment last year so I have had a (very small) pay rise. Didn't you get yours?

There is no real career progression if you are the Jet Flight Manager, otherwise, there is. If you think it is slow in flybe, try Britannia or Monarch...

It's funny how you contradict yourself, you start out saying people are fed up and everybody wants to leave, then say that there is no career progression to the jet- because, presumably, nobody is leaving the jet fleet!

excrab

You are partly right- however, the real limit on flying for us is that a lot of the airports we fly to close early (like the Channel Islands or Belfast City for example). Very few people really want to travel on commuter routes late at night in any case.

I find it hard to pick faults with a management that has got us out of a serious hole since last year- and now has us back in the black, more than can be said for many airlines- and a marketing department that has spent a huge amount of money and has seen a corresponding rise in passenger figures- not to mention the huge success of our website. Perhaps you need to talk to somebody who was at Kickstart to see just how well we have done.

2 BE or not 2 BE 3rd December 2002 17:26

Excrab.

When I mentioned the word Jet, I was talking about an average modern Jet, not the 146, which even referred to as turboprop by some of it’s own crew.
I was thinking about Jet’s like Airbus, Boeing, Bombardier, Dornier, Embraer or Fokker.

Raw Data.


I find it hard to pick faults
How about the lack of communication with it’s personnel?
There seems to be a lot of info about the company on PPRuNe.
For instance You are saying we are back in the black. :)
I haven’t seen that in any company info!?!? :confused: :confused: :confused:

oic 3rd December 2002 17:47

RD:
I don't recall saying that I was fed up - nor am I claiming to be speaking on behalf of the majority - I just stated that I believe that those people who leave do so for the reasons outlined in my post.

Increments are just a (very small) reward for your loyalty. I would not call this a pay-rise. If you worked for EasyJet, you could look forward to a 5% loyalty bonus after two years - a commander would get an extra £3000. In comparison, I would classify our 500-odd quid as an insult.

I am not contradicting myself by stating that a lot of people will be stuck on the dash. I suggest you re-read my post.

"you start out saying people are fed up and everybody wants to leave"

I did not. I said that people are leaving, I never said everybody wants to leave.

", then say that there is no career progression to the jet- because, presumably, nobody is leaving the jet fleet!"

Exactly! That's why people are stuck on the Dash! More TP's = Less Jet jobs.

I would appreciate it if you took the time to read the post carefully before commenting.

Cheers!

Smokie 3rd December 2002 17:51

RD,

Well today I've got it on good authority that 3 more 146 pilots
have resigned, one is off to the land of Orange starting very early in the New Year.

You were saying about no more early releases ?
:rolleyes:

agcat 3rd December 2002 18:54

Hey chaps- do not worry - seen it all before over many years,
pilots will move on at this time of year (ask Jo S)may cost the company in further training expense!
Also, I know a lot of pilots who found the grass was not greener on the otherside - more brown and working b*****ks off.

Raw Data 3rd December 2002 18:56

2 BE or not 2 BE


How about the lack of communication with it’s personnel?For instance You are saying we are back in the black.
I haven’t seen that in any company info!?!?
That information was aired at Kickstart. See your Base Captain. Or ask your Fleet Manager. The info is there if you want it. Or do you want a personal call from the GM???

By faults, I was talking about faults in the management of the business- there is absolutely no doubt that our management have done an excellent job of that. Communication is icing on the cake compared to keeping the business afloat- however I would be the first to acknowledge that communication is woefully inadequate.

oic


Increments are just a (very small) reward for your loyalty. I would not call this a pay-rise.
If your pay went up, it was a pay rise. In my version of english, at any rate...!!!


If you worked for EasyJet, you could look forward to a 5% loyalty bonus after two years - a commander would get an extra £3000. In comparison, I would classify our 500-odd quid as an insult.
Sure. We could do that too, but the company would fold the next day. We can only pay what we can afford. When we are making more profit, salaries will go up. You can hardly use easyjet as a good example, as pressure there seems to be on lowering salaries, not raising them- not to mention their practice of giving their managers a huge sum and not rewarding the troops accordingly. Besides, you have to put up with a lot of crap to get the salary (working all hours, having them promise you a base and then change their minds, etc).


Exactly! That's why people are stuck on the Dash! More TP's = Less Jet jobs.
Not unless we get rid of jets, otherwise the jet jobs stay the same.

I did read your posts (on the previous thread as well) and stand by my reply.

Smokie

They were either released back at the beginning of this saga, or they have cut a deal. I didn't say that there would be no more early relaeases, only that the company would do that if they needed to in order to avoid redundancies. Unless you know all the facts of each individual case, you aren't telling us anything new.

oic 3rd December 2002 19:15

RD:

From your post:

"Not unless we get rid of jets, otherwise the jet jobs stay the same."

Absolutely! And since we are reducing the number of jets and increasing the number of TP's, that's exactly what's happening.

From my original post:

"If the company are changing the ratio of TP versus JETs in favour of the turboprops, I reckon many people will leave simply because they are stuck on the dash without any real prospects of getting on a jet in the forseeable future"

Hope you get my point.

From your post:
"If your pay went up, it was a pay rise. In my version of english, at any rate...!!!"

I would argue that if your salary increased at a rate lower than inflation, you would experience a pay-cut. If you want to call it a pay-rise, be my guest, but I'd say your remark is a bit naive.

Cheers.

Smokie 3rd December 2002 19:21

RD ,

I'd say they either cut a deal or were "worth" the early release.
My money is on the latter, as it has not even been two weeks since their "weekend away", so their notice is very,very, recent !



WRT Payrise's the money is always there, it just needs to be budgeted for , just like any other expense .

Perhaps the tumble drier down below 50 north needs to be on a slower setting. ;)

Raw Data 3rd December 2002 19:31

oic

Where do you get the idea we are reducing the number of jets? The overall number of jets should stay substantially the same. If you want more info on that, ask on the private forum. Ask about the fleet manning levels as publicised at Kickstart.

Smokie


WRT Payrise's the money is always there, it just needs to be budgeted for , just like any other expense .
That is, to say the least, naive. OK then, we'll raise the salaries and stop buying fuel...

Just what do you think we could cut in order to increase salaries...???

oic 3rd December 2002 19:40

RD:
If my information is correct, the CRJ's are about to go. I also believe that FlyBE has already gotten rid of some of the older 146's - correct me if I'm wrong. Meanwhile, the dash-fleet has expanded. I would say that the ratio of jets vs TP's has changed.

2 BE or not 2 BE 3rd December 2002 19:44

RAW DATA

Unfortunately I was not at the kickstart meeting. I was flying that day. Someone has to work so the company earns some money (to waist it again on hotac costs etc.) If the fleet manager or GM have some info that most of us pilots consider worth knowing wouldn’t it be easier if they send us a letter of some sort, rather than receiving 200 or more phone calls from its personnel?
But I’m glad you’re saying:

I would be the first to acknowledge that communication is woefully inadequate.
BTW


having them promise you a base and then change their minds, etc
That's been done by FlyBE as well!!!
A couple of guys have had 3 base changes in 4 months after joining us. Or being based in TLS only to be based in BHX approx. 11 months later.

oic 3rd December 2002 19:47

No worries - I reckon you'll get the 'kickstart video' as a Christmas bonus! :D

2 BE or not 2 BE 3rd December 2002 20:02

Cool!
Is there also a kickstart video game? a shooter? :D :D :D

carlos vandango 3rd December 2002 20:20

at risk of sounding contraversial (again), it would appear that Easyjet have abolished their assessment procedure in favour of 'drawing straws'. Or perhaps 4 weeks notice earns you a free ILS in the sim . For those left in Flybe the problems of promotion should begin to be addressed...more jet positions to fill.
And before anybody starts..yes I know the vast majority of Flybe crew are good. I'm sure the good ones that are off to Easy will be missed.;)

NDBDME 3rd December 2002 21:30

This is great!!

NO future at Flybe

RD as you know I am a Q400 driver you have been on the jump seat you know how good it is but not good for the airline!! your words not mine. The real picture is many people do want to stay with Flybe but more are going to leave!!!:cool:

Raw Data 3rd December 2002 21:45

oic

You are correct- if you only look at the disposal of the CRJs. However, the fleet acquistion plan stretches until 2005. Therefore the final numbers of each type are somewhat different to what you obviously perceive them to be.

2 BE or not 2 BE


If the fleet manager or GM have some info that most of us pilots consider worth knowing wouldn’t it be easier if they send us a letter of some sort, rather than receiving 200 or more phone calls from its personnel?
The way it is supposed to work, is that each Base Captain is invited to attend the Kickstart, and they then cascade the information down to the pilots and cabin crew at their base. It is actually a very 2002 way of doing things, but it relies on managers (ie base captains etc), to cascade the information.


That's been done by FlyBE as well!!! A couple of guys have had 3 base changes in 4 months after joining us.
The crucial word there is "after". Once you join, you are given (hopefully) a contract which, amongst other things, specifies under what circumstances the company can change your base. I know something about this, having had four bases in four years. On the other hand, Easy employed people who accepted the job on the basis of the base they were offered. Once they had resigned from their jobs with Flybe, Easy changed the rules (and their bases). Flybe don't operate in quite such an underhand way. But don't take my word for it, ask those affected (at least one of which tried to get back into Flybe as soon as he found out he was being shipped off to Liverpool or somewhere). As I understand it, you now don't get assigned a base until you complete your final line check. Makes me bl**dy glad I declined their offer.

Finally, I echo what carlos vandango says- the good ones that have left will be missed indeed (certainly the EDI ones, by me).

Goforfun 3rd December 2002 21:46

easyJet is the natural progression from a company like BE. Its the move into the big airline world- flying bigger aeroplanes- further and for more money!

BE is a great place to start off.... but a dead end.

AMEX 3rd December 2002 22:29

Raw Data


There are no current plans to recruit, apart from the Cabair cadets we have committed to.
I am sure this correct although getting phone calls just within days after submitting your CV can be taken as a sign of things to come,... perhaps.

Apparently nothing anticipated until Exeter knows/decides the fate of the CRJ which is still uncertain (although i understand HF is being fitted which could be useful to market the A/C in some parts of the world).

As for the rest, I know notin' :D

Smokie 3rd December 2002 22:38

Contracts, there's another great British tradition gone by the way side . Seems to me they only honour contracts when it suits them ; I am sick and tired of counting the myraid of breaches of the afore mentioned.

And yes many moons ago my base was changed about a week prior to joining and after I had handed in my notice at the previous company. So no stranger to that one either I'm afraid.

There is certainly one "Character" from north of the Wall, who I'm sure a lot of people will be glad to see the back of.

RD, wise up pal, you need to take a closer look at what has been going on below 50 north and certainly take what ever you are told from Fantasy Island with a very large pinch of salt .

And to quote another infamous character on pprune:-

"It ain't gona change any time soon "

carlos vandango 3rd December 2002 23:32

I hear EZY are modifying their sim..giving much more headroom in the front and strengthening the compression struts. That should cover all eventualities.:D

Raw Data 3rd December 2002 23:37

Goforfun

The big airline world? Well, maybe, but not a lot of variety. After 20 years or so in Easy, you will still be flying around in 737/A320 (probably knackered by then), to the same long runways.

I prefer the variety we get in Flybe myself, but, each to his own, whatever floats your boat.

Most people who have been in the business for any length of time realise that going from Flybe (or a similar-sized airline) to Easy (or whatever) is just more of the same. If you think Easy is nirvana, explain all the discontent amongst their employees that seems to spill over onto this forum. The only value is the type rating, but even that is becoming questionable. Easyjet is as much a dead end as Flybe is.


AMEX

Flybe (in common with many airlines) often takes the temperature of the pilot pool.

Smokie

Still having trouble understanding why you haven't left for Big Orange if you are so disenchanted with your present circumstances. Why is that exactly?

If the company has breached your contract so often, I imagine you have spoken to Balpa. What did they say?

I wonder how many others have had their base changed before they started. Anyone...???

As it happens, I do keep a close eye on what goes on, but I get my information from the managers concerned, not the local rumour mill. I trust my managers.

There are two types of pilot in any airline. One type does his or her best to fit in, evaluates everything from a position of balance, and realises that there is a lot more to running an airline than flying planes.

The other type doubts everything, is deeply distrustful of any manager, and feels he or she can do every job in the airline better than the person doing it.

One type tends to have a more successful time than the other...

the_tyke 4th December 2002 08:12

Well done Pprune or whoever it was that removed the original post !
You simply can't have people giving totally ridiculous and innacurate information over a public forum which could damage a Company and therefore put our jobs at risk.
Why does everybody assume that we all want to go to Easyjet ? Yes, the pay needs addressing urgently but having read the posts on other Airlines recently, your going to get heart-ache wherever you go.
My Brother fly's for Easyjet, so I get a lot of first-hand info from him. 'Wild horses' would'nt drag me there at the moment !

Ace Rimmer 4th December 2002 08:16

OIC yep the Q400 is not only quick and it's not just the cruise but the up and down rates as well. The numbers I've heard agree with your 5 mins slower on BHX-EDI but here's the kick, it does it on about half the fuel burn.

I reckon you blokes at fly BE need to get a grip of a T/P future. The word I've heard is that the bearded one has been spending a lot of time in Toronto of late negotiating a swop of the CRJs for more Q400s (seems they haven't agreed the ratio of Q4s for CRJs or some such but expect an announcement before very long) so it's D8s or quadrapuffs for you and more D8s than 'puffs.

oic 4th December 2002 08:59

RD:
"Most people who have been in the business for any length of time realise that going from Flybe (or a similar-sized airline) to Easy (or whatever) is just more of the same."

Exactly! more specifically, money! :D

You're right about EZ being as much as a dead-end as FlyBE, but I suppose that's true for any airline, it just depends on what your expectations are. From the EZ terms and conditions, a line trainer with 5 to 10 years service can look forward to about £80.000 a year (including duty pay), which is substantially more than what you get. A much more comfortable position to be stuck in.

Smokie 4th December 2002 09:18

Carlos,

Nice one mate !

RD,

I'm afraid Orange clashes with my matching hand bag & poodle
and definately not my cup of tea either.
As for distrusting the management, why do you think that is then?
WRT the base change there are at least three other guys who were in the same boat.
BTW who said anything about just my contract ?

Ace,

I heard pretty much the same in the last couple of days as well.
As for half the fuel burn, well its only got half the number of engines. :D

The Marketing and Advertising departments have done a sterling job, no doubt about it. Shame that other deprtments haven't followed suit.
I keep looking for the light at the end of the tunnel, perhaps someone should switch it on first .:(

puddle-jumper 4th December 2002 09:33

RD,

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
'Training costs, well, sure there will be training costs when we hire again- but the cost of keeping crews sitting on their tods doing nothing for six months is fairly expensive too'
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

How much does it cost to train a new recruit on to the 146, if you take the company figures it's somewhere between 15-20 grand isn't it ? 6 months of F/O's salary = £15000 (that's the one's who don't get £20K per year) or Capt's = £25. So on average we don't save a penny but what we do lose is something difficult to buy - Experience.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
'However, the fleet acquisition plan stretches until 2005. '
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks for that one, I haven't laughed so much in weeks.:D

Wet Power 4th December 2002 11:35

When he says the fleet acquisition plans stretch to 2005 he means five past eight this evening.


All times are GMT. The time now is 17:45.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.