Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

BA towing mishap

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

BA towing mishap

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 4th December 2002 | 18:24
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,914
Likes: 0
From: UK
TwinAisle_ I remember the investigation into the freight door accidents drew out that the loaders, unable to stow the door handle, were 'putting their knee' to it to force it home to close up. You can't do this with aluminium aeroplanes. I think it fair to say if the loaders were going to travel on that aeroplane, I don't think they would have used such brute force when something is obviously jamming in the mechanism.
Notso Fantastic is offline  
Old 4th December 2002 | 19:26
  #42 (permalink)  

 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 296
Likes: 0
From: STN and HPN
Our barless tugs have the usual orange ACB on the roof together with a red one, is the red one related to towing without acft beacons on?
Departures Beckham is offline  
Old 4th December 2002 | 19:28
  #43 (permalink)  
Scourge of Bad Airline Management!
50 Countries Visited
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,245
Likes: 229
From: Global Nomad
NSF - you are right, the baggage handlers were noted to be using brute force to close the DC10 cargo door. HOWEVER - the whole point was that when they did this, the door appeared to be safe - the vent door closed and the warning lights went out.

A well designed door may still have yielded to brute force, but SHOULD NEVER yield in such a way that it indicated it was safe when it was not. That was the bad design.

As I said - blame the designer for a bad door, not a baggage handler for screwing up when using a badly designed door....

TA
TwinAisle is offline  
Old 4th December 2002 | 21:05
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,914
Likes: 0
From: UK
Yes, but this is leading to a side issue. My main point is careless operation of expensive equipment by the handlers concerned! Agreed the design was not as good as it could have been, but couple that with brute force and insensitive handling, then you are going to get aeroplanes towed into other aeroplanes!
Notso Fantastic is offline  
Old 5th December 2002 | 06:47
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
From: Cloud Cuckoo Land
Any photos of the BA incident???
Plastique is offline  
Old 7th December 2002 | 01:39
  #46 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,525
Likes: 6
From: In Frozen Chunks (Cloud Cuckoo Land)
JUST WANTED TO BRING IT TO THE TOP AGAIN !!!! - ANYONE GOT THEIR HANDS ON SOME PHOTOS YET ?

blueloo is offline  
Old 7th December 2002 | 07:19
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,271
Likes: 0
From: West Country
I was told yesterday that senior mismanagement had banned all pictures because after last weeks incident with the Rocket they don't want any more bad publicity in The Sun and other papers.
Jet II is offline  
Old 7th December 2002 | 14:47
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
From: London
JAS,
You make it sound like 'big expensive mistakes' are ok.
I'm sure the BA management are delighted to have two longhaul aircraft out of service for weeks on end, but hey, it was a mistake, and yeah, a bit expensive, but that's ok! Get real. I'm sure they've got better things to spend £12m plus on than repairing aeroplanes bent by ground crew.
And as for blaming Easyjet or Ryanair, grow up.
ratarsedagain is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.