BA towing mishap
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Dubai
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
BA towing mishap
BA have damaged G BNLE B747 400 in a towing incident at LHR on Friday afternoon. Mind you they may have tried to hush it up because the airport authority were not told until 3 hours after the event !!
A B777 was stopped at the Eastchurch crossing waiting for the gates to open on its way to the base when LE which was towing behind it failed to stop.
The nose went straight through APU of the B777.
The aircrafts a mess with a massive hole from the nose cone up to the cockpit window.and reports are that cost of repair is 2 1/2 million quid . Apparantly it punctured the bulk head because the 1st class cabin is not as it should be.
An expensive mistake
A B777 was stopped at the Eastchurch crossing waiting for the gates to open on its way to the base when LE which was towing behind it failed to stop.
The nose went straight through APU of the B777.
The aircrafts a mess with a massive hole from the nose cone up to the cockpit window.and reports are that cost of repair is 2 1/2 million quid . Apparantly it punctured the bulk head because the 1st class cabin is not as it should be.
An expensive mistake
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: sussex
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The towbarless tug appears to have had yet another brake failure
Was the cockpit brake man in the 747 awake?
Was there pressure in the Nbr 4 system?
Was the brakeman a skilled engineer or another 'approved person'with 5 minutes training.
I'm sure the insurance company will sort it out.any pictures?
Was the cockpit brake man in the 747 awake?
Was there pressure in the Nbr 4 system?
Was the brakeman a skilled engineer or another 'approved person'with 5 minutes training.
I'm sure the insurance company will sort it out.any pictures?
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Smogsville
Posts: 1,424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Probably no APU running to save money and why start it to pressurize the the Accumulator (it'll be all right), I can think of two other instances where the tow bar broke and this sort of thing happened.
Poor man in the cockpit was trying to start the APU in a hurry I bet.
Poor man in the cockpit was trying to start the APU in a hurry I bet.
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
towbarless tractors do require a (wo)man in the cockpit
the brakes must be set during the 'pickup' and during the parking after the tow
kind of weird if he gets out the seat during the pull
the brakes must be set during the 'pickup' and during the parking after the tow
kind of weird if he gets out the seat during the pull
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: New York
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Got to agree with Gaspath on this one...
The BA ATP dosent require any one on board when using a Towbarless tug... That after all is why they use it to save on manpower costs.
As long as the A/C is chocked its ok.
Will double check and confirm tomorrow.
LP
The BA ATP dosent require any one on board when using a Towbarless tug... That after all is why they use it to save on manpower costs.
As long as the A/C is chocked its ok.
Will double check and confirm tomorrow.
LP
Sims Fly Virtually
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Used to be 3rd Sand Dune from the Left - But now I'm somewhere else somewhere else.
Posts: 704
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
or perhaps nobody on the tug or the 747 noticed a tiny 777 stopped in front of them 
Oooops!
Oooops!
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: West Country
Posts: 1,271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
BA do NOT require anyone on the flightdeck when being towed by Towbarless tractors.
Generally the a/c are parked with the brakes off and chocked so that the tuggies can pick-up and move it at any time.
As for the AAIB or the delay in informing the BAA, if the accident happened in a BA maintenance area then there is no real need to involve either.
Generally the a/c are parked with the brakes off and chocked so that the tuggies can pick-up and move it at any time.
As for the AAIB or the delay in informing the BAA, if the accident happened in a BA maintenance area then there is no real need to involve either.
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
sorry then
worked a while at Schiphol with KLM's aircraft towing dept
they did require a brake driver at the helm upstairs, also to put the beacon on once moving, surprised BA doesn't
they did require a brake driver at the helm upstairs, also to put the beacon on once moving, surprised BA doesn't
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Can't remember
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
mainecoon & JetII
Dont think the AAIB need be involved in this.
Extract from the regualations in the AAIB web site :-
"accident" means an occurrence associated with the operation of an aircraft which takes place between the time any person boards the aircraft with the intention of flight until such time as all such persons have disembarked.
Tea & biccies for someone !
SP
Dont think the AAIB need be involved in this.
Extract from the regualations in the AAIB web site :-
"accident" means an occurrence associated with the operation of an aircraft which takes place between the time any person boards the aircraft with the intention of flight until such time as all such persons have disembarked.
Tea & biccies for someone !
SP
Seem to remember that when BA started this towbarless tugging at LGW, not only did they not have anyone on the flight deck, but at night there was no requirement to have lights on the towed aircraft, relying on the tugs revolving yellows to notify anyone else of the combination.
In the dark, coming up behind, it was very difficult to see. Don't know if this still happens.
In the dark, coming up behind, it was very difficult to see. Don't know if this still happens.
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yes but then which organisation regulates matters relating to the ANO?
And which organisation thus will not want to upset it's biggest paying customer?
krisskross: I don't know about now, but up until end of November last year when I was still with VS, BA were still towing aircraft around LHR with no beacons on save for the one on the tug.
And which organisation thus will not want to upset it's biggest paying customer?
krisskross: I don't know about now, but up until end of November last year when I was still with VS, BA were still towing aircraft around LHR with no beacons on save for the one on the tug.
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: The south
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Actually No the ANO was not being breached because the tugs were exempt having more flashy lights (if you pardon the pun), to make up for the nav lights off. Agree with the others, BA didnt use anyone in the flight deck so had to ensure the a/c was chocked prior to and after towing with park brake left off. Sounded dodgy and didnt agree with it, but told to do it nevertheless
Cheers
Cheers