Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Emirates B777-200ER incident

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Emirates B777-200ER incident

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12th Sep 2002, 16:43
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Doha, Qatar
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Emirates B777-200ER incident

On September 11th Flight EK401 on the new DXB-PER route diverted to KUL and returned back to DXB rather than continue to PER which indicates a seriuos mechanical problem that required the aircraft to return to base.

I am interested in knowing if anyone has any info regarding the incident and what aircraft it was?
MTQatar is offline  
Old 12th Sep 2002, 19:54
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: South East UK
Posts: 428
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Understand it was the six-year old A6-EMI that suffered Trent engine failure resulting in diversion.

But don't tell anyone I told you
Kalium Chloride is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2002, 09:20
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: vancouver canada
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
MTQatar
How did you hear of this??
just curious
A330-200 is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2002, 13:07
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Doha, Qatar
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A330-200,

I heard that from an Emirates "Fan" on the day of the alleged incident.

Kalium Chloride,

Thanks for the info, the RR Trent and in particular the Trent 892 which is the version used on the EK 777-200ER's has a bad record when compared to the GE90. Was the problem similar to that experienced by EK in the past three incidents?
MTQatar is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2002, 13:22
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: vancouver canada
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
MTQatar

Is there any way I could get to talk to this EK 'Fan'?

maybe you could get him/her to private msg me

thx
A330-200 is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2002, 14:53
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: southern england
Posts: 1,650
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post not so old!

KC,

Perish the thought that I should be considered "pedantic", but A6-EMI was delivered on 25/7/97, which makes it just over 5 years old.
newswatcher is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2002, 19:08
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Middle East
Posts: 806
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Newswatcher,

None of us would ever describe you as pedantic. Rather, extremely diligent and unbiased. I always enjoy your posts.

Short, sweet and to the point.


MTQatar / others...

how did EK handle the passenger situation? Transfer to other carriers or fly out an additional aircraft? I suppose that this being a 4 times weekly service would mean that it probably happened too on a day where there were no flights for the next 3 days.......sods law.
A300Man is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2002, 22:19
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Fantasy Island
Posts: 555
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In the interests of being pedantic, surely a 4x weekly service doesn't _have_ to be a case of '4 on, 3 off'?

Surely you could have M-W-F-S services and flights every other day?
BahrainLad is offline  
Old 14th Sep 2002, 11:47
  #9 (permalink)  

Usual disclaimers apply!
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: EGGW
Posts: 843
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Trent 892 which is the version used on the EK 777-200ER's has a bad record when compared to the GE90.
It does? Don't forget there are a lot more Trents around than GE90s and the GE90 failures don't seem to make the press.
Having said that the '90 usually only spend a couple of weeks on wing before they're pulled for one reason or another
gas path is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2002, 12:45
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 1998
Location: USA
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
gas path:

The Trent 892 does seem to have pretty bad IFSD rate, especially with airlines operate in warmer climate. In particular, Thai's Trent 892 on the B777-300 fleet has a IFSD above 0.04 per 1,000 EFHs. That is, it's more than twice the rate allowed for 180-minute ETOPS (0.02), or slightly below that of 120-minute ETOPS (0.05). Thai chose to suspend their ETOPS unilaterally.
casual observer is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2002, 16:00
  #11 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Hilton, Sheraton or Marriott
Posts: 1,817
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
MT, please give careful thought before identifying your source to A330-200. I would imagine that like most other folk, Emirates personnel have a non-disclosure clause in their contracts and you could get someone into serious trouble by revealing their identity.

4HolerPoler
Moderator Middle East Forum
4HolerPoler is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2002, 16:10
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Courchevel
Posts: 848
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I agree. Don't reveal your source MT. Obviously EK are keen to keep these things quiet like any other carrier would but these forums are all about inside info and rumours etc.
Count von Altibar is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.