Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Any more Dash 8 200s?


Notices
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Any more Dash 8 200s?

Old 20th September 2024 | 00:49
  #21 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 4,687
Likes: 254
From: Australia
C1300. Thanks for confirming the rumour. Can you advise me the name of the organisation?
Dick Smith is online now  
Reply
Old 20th September 2024 | 05:12
  #22 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 20
Likes: 1
From: Australia
It would warm my heart to see the Dash 8-200 come back into production. It was one of the nicest aeroplanes I have flown and beautifully balanced. If they included some of the STC upgrades from Fields as have companies like Air Greenland it would be even better than the original.
e2_c is offline  
Reply
Old 20th September 2024 | 06:02
  #23 (permalink)  
40 Countries Visited
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,761
Likes: 385
Deutsche Aircraft is developing a new version of the Dornier 328 turboprop, the slightly stretched D328eco with gravel gear. This might fit your bill?

https://www.deutscheaircraft.com/products/d328eco
Less Hair is online now  
Reply
Old 20th September 2024 | 07:14
  #24 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 960
Likes: 11
From: Where the Money Takes Me
DHC reigniting another line? Good grief - they've hardly enough manpower to continue with their current load. Place is bereft of folk.
LGW Vulture is offline  
Reply
Old 20th September 2024 | 09:03
  #25 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 345
Likes: 38
From: Lander, WY, USA
Bring back the Pan Am Clipper?
340drvr is offline  
Reply
Old 20th September 2024 | 09:10
  #26 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,628
Likes: 1,183
From: Aus
Dash-8 200 would be a waste of tooling, a 300 restart would be more likely to attract enough customers. The Dash-8 design is too big/heavy for an economical 30-40 seat airliner vs its competition, bump to its 50-70 seat market and its a much better fit. Very unlikely a 30-40 seat dash would get the 100-200 orders to make a restart viable, especially with economical modern opposition in the market like the Dornier 328 ECO around the corner in the 30-40 seat range.

Bring back the Pan Am Clipper?
Get some of those jet powered Russian flying ships. Lun class, Ekranoplan, if on a budget, the recently designed A-050 Ekranoplan might be more economical.
43Inches is offline  
Reply
Old 20th September 2024 | 09:20
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Aviation Qualifications: SLF
Posts: 1,017
Likes: 1,065
From: Australia
Originally Posted by 43Inches
Dash-8 200 would be a waste of tooling, a 300 restart would be more likely to attract enough customers. The Dash-8 design is too big/heavy for an economical 30-40 seat airliner vs its competition, bump to its 50-70 seat market and its a much better fit. Very unlikely a 30-40 seat dash would get the 100-200 orders to make a restart viable, especially with economical modern opposition in the market like the Dornier 328 ECO around the corner in the 30-40 seat range.



Get some of those jet powered Russian flying ships. Lun class, Ekranoplan, if on a budget, the recently designed A-050 Ekranoplan might be more economical.
And how well does the Ekranoplan work in rough seas?
artee is online now  
Reply
Old 20th September 2024 | 09:26
  #28 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,628
Likes: 1,183
From: Aus
Originally Posted by artee
And how well does the Ekranoplan work in rough seas?
No idea, but apparently the 2nd Lun class that was only partially completed in the 80s may be finished off as a high speed rescue/transport for the Arctic. Although it sounds like a believe it when it flies type rumor.

PS I was joking about the Ekranoplans, there's no chance anyone outside the old communist regimes would touch the things. Although even less chance of a Sunderland or Clipper coming back to do the run.
43Inches is offline  
Reply
Old 20th September 2024 | 11:46
  #29 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 629
Likes: 187
From: Netherlands
Originally Posted by Less Hair
Deutsche Aircraft is developing a new version of the Dornier 328 turboprop, the slightly stretched D328eco with gravel gear. This might fit your bill?

https://www.deutscheaircraft.com/products/d328eco
That looks quite similar in capacity to the ATR42-600S. 40 seats with 70% load factor with 800m runway on 250 NM sector, vs 200NM for the ATR.

Looking at the payload range, the fuel tank does seem to have a bit more capacity, which seems to be a limiting factor for the ATR. 760nm should be doable with ~35 pax.

https://www.d328.eco/product-features
procede is offline  
Reply
Old 20th September 2024 | 12:03
  #30 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 4,574
Likes: 410
From: FNQ ... It's Permanent!
No one wants to fly 200nm! Stuff the airport. You can get in a car or train and get there easier and quicker!
Capt Fathom is offline  
Reply
Old 20th September 2024 | 12:15
  #31 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 205
Likes: 3
From: Meteorology Avenue
ATR42 600S

Rumours say that ATR 42 600S didn't pass the tests and is kind of history now...
maximus610 is offline  
Reply
Old 20th September 2024 | 12:33
  #32 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 629
Likes: 187
From: Netherlands
Originally Posted by Capt Fathom
No one wants to fly 200nm! Stuff the airport. You can get in a car or train and get there easier and quicker!
I agree, but that is not an option if you are on an island. A boat will take 10 hours at 20 knots...
procede is offline  
Reply
Old 20th September 2024 | 15:31
  #33 (permalink)  
c52
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,305
Likes: 8
From: Surrey
How about a Chinook? Boeing 234LR has sufficient range assuming a helicopter has no need to be able to divert back to its point of departure.. Must admit I am surprised that an LR version of anything stops at 540 miles.
c52 is offline  
Reply
Old 20th September 2024 | 22:15
  #34 (permalink)  
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2018
Aviation Qualifications: Non-Aircrew
Posts: 275
Likes: 152
From: Australia
How about a civilian version of the CN-235? At first glance the specs seem broadly similar:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CASA/I...cations_(CN235)
AnotherFSO is offline  
Reply
Old 21st September 2024 | 00:27
  #35 (permalink)  
Community Builder
Community Influencer
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Aviation Qualifications: Non-Aircrew
Posts: 5,672
Likes: 3,314
From: Everett, WA
Originally Posted by AnotherFSO
How about a civilian version of the CN-235? At first glance the specs seem broadly similar:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CASA/I...cations_(CN235)
I've flown on a civilian (Indonesian built) CN-235.
What a POS - perhaps the only time I've been truly scared on a commercial flight.
tdracer is offline  
Reply
Old 21st September 2024 | 18:36
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Aviation Qualifications: PPL
Posts: 7,172
Likes: 292
From: Nanaimo (CAC8)
Originally Posted by tdracer
… perhaps the only time I've been truly scared on a commercial flight.
Do tell more!

I used to live in Jakarta and flew on Garuda many times. I was never truly scared, only mildly apprehensive on occasion. However I was in Bali, when a DC-9 overran the 10,000’ runway and ended up in the mangrove swamp beside the road to Nusa Dua!
India Four Two is offline  
Reply
Old 21st September 2024 | 20:50
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Aviation Qualifications: PPL
Posts: 10,567
Likes: 798
From: Northumberland
Originally Posted by Capt Fathom
No one wants to fly 200nm! Stuff the airport. You can get in a car or train and get there easier and quicker!
If there is a road or a train track....
SWBKCB is online now  
Reply
Old 22nd September 2024 | 01:08
  #38 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 977
Likes: 120
From: Oz
Tamarack are investigating their winglets on the Q400.

If we are talking of new engines for a -300, could it be turned into a 340Kt baby 400?

https://www.flyingmag.com/tamarack-m...-with-skyalps/

nomorecatering is online now  
Reply
Old 22nd September 2024 | 04:05
  #39 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
Veteran: Canadian Forces
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 5,655
Likes: 500
From: Canada
I don’t understand why they can’t just keep operating the Dash 8 200? Find the lowest time lowest cycle one out there and buy it as a dedicated airplane for this route. This is massively cheaper than extending the runway.

Heck look at the Basler Turbine DC3. 80 year old airframe and still going strong and more than capable on the existing runway

Big Pistons Forever is offline  
Reply
Old 22nd September 2024 | 05:22
  #40 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 4,704
Likes: 589
From: 500 miles from Chaikhosi, Yogistan
Originally Posted by Big Pistons Forever
I don’t understand why they can’t just keep operating the Dash 8 200? Find the lowest time lowest cycle one out there and buy it as a dedicated airplane for this route. This is massively cheaper than extending the runway.

Heck look at the Basler Turbine DC3. 80 year old airframe and still going strong and more than capable on the existing runway
The basler is not the best thing to use as an argument there. Hell it even had to be grandfathered to meet the nascent safety standards of the FAR in 1954. Don’t be fooled by the marketing - it’s only the modifications (ie engines) that are certified to modern aeronautical safety standards not the whole aircraft.

The idea of stocking up on -200s isn’t a bad stop gap measure (if they’re not doing that already ) but it too will have a finite end time, hence this thread.

The TCDS shows -200 and -300 have an underlying certification basis of 1965 - almost 60 years old.
The -400 is 1995.
compressor stall is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.