Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

NWS3501

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11th Nov 2022, 20:29
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,822
Received 206 Likes on 94 Posts
Originally Posted by JanetFlight
I bet my left hand small finger that 90% of ATC'ers do not know that the icao code NWS belongs to a russian carrier except those who have some kind of planespotter and aviation passion inside them...my humble two cents.
I'd be surprised if there are many ATCCs that don't have a copy of this on their bookshelf:


DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2022, 22:08
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: on the way to sea
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by JanetFlight
I bet my left hand small finger that 90% of ATC'ers do not know that the icao code NWS belongs to a russian carrier except those who have some kind of planespotter and aviation passion inside them...my humble two cents.
Say goodbye to your left hand small finger. Every ATCO in Europe knows NWS. And DavidReidUK, I don't know what software you are using (my guess some ancient stuff)....our FDPS has integrated DOC8585, so we don't have to learn all the three letter codes by heart/or look them up in paper version.
kontrolor is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2022, 22:21
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: London
Posts: 45
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by zerograv
How does this work in terms of ATC, namely, separating other traffic from this flight ? Does ATC receive their Flight Plan and more or less know what's going on, or that's not the case ?
In areas with radar coverage it will be visible to ATC and therefore ATC can deviate other traffic from him, but once it gets in the Atlantic there are large areas where it will be out of radar coverage.
The sanctions haven't suspended civil aviation cooperation; ATC service is still provided to Russian aircraft in the same way as it is provided to other aircraft.
bobbytables is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2022, 23:55
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Southern Shores of Lusitania Kingdom
Age: 53
Posts: 858
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Allow me to respectfuly disagree...having the 8585 it doesnt mean automatically we are aware of everything there.
For example the "media" incident at JFK regarding the Alitalia versus Air France would have a better outcome if all the parts involved were aware of ITA vs AZA (colours, callsigns, 8585 Code).
JanetFlight is offline  
Old 12th Nov 2022, 06:33
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,822
Received 206 Likes on 94 Posts
Originally Posted by kontrolor
Say goodbye to your left hand small finger. Every ATCO in Europe knows NWS.
I'm sure they do, but bear in mind we're talking about the airspace above the Bahamas/Cayman Islands in this instance.

Originally Posted by kontrolor
I don't know what software you are using (my guess some ancient stuff)....
As a penniless retiree, all my software is ancient.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 12th Nov 2022, 06:38
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Northumberland
Posts: 8,586
Received 94 Likes on 64 Posts
Originally Posted by JanetFlight
I bet my left hand small finger that 90% of ATC'ers do not know that the icao code NWS belongs to a russian carrier except those who have some kind of planespotter and aviation passion inside them...my humble two cents.
Wouldn't they have a flightplan showing the origin and destination ?
SWBKCB is online now  
Old 12th Nov 2022, 07:48
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: OnScreen
Posts: 416
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SWBKCB
Wouldn't they have a flightplan showing the origin and destination ?
Probably, because FR24 does seem to know where they are heading for.

However, having a flightplan, does not imply for certain, they are following the filed route. Or just deviate, and somewhere near the end, contact a friendly ATC with the message "here I am", blablabla.
WideScreen is offline  
Old 12th Nov 2022, 08:05
  #28 (permalink)  
Pegase Driver
 
Join Date: May 1997
Location: Europe
Age: 74
Posts: 3,694
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Everybody seems to either forget (or unaware for the Flight simulator "pilots" here ) that en route ATC is a service provider and not the police. Every aircraft regardless of nationality, origin or destination, will receive the same service, as I am separating it from you also . The next is the difference between Sovreign ( national ) airspace and international one ( read "High seas" ) which some of us tried to explain before . If an aircraft is not allowed in my national airspace, it is an issue for Air defense, not civil ATC.
For us those flights are normal and are being provided the same ATC service as any other aircraft in that airspace.

as to DOC8585, yes it is integrated in most ATC software nowadays. even in the Nassau FIR , who controlled that flight before being transferred to Miami FIR , but we use it sometimes to find the radio call sign , not to find out who owns the aircraft .
ATC Watcher is online now  
Old 12th Nov 2022, 09:08
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,822
Received 206 Likes on 94 Posts
Originally Posted by ATC Watcher
as to DOC8585, yes it is integrated in most ATC software nowadays. even in the Nassau FIR , who controlled that flight before being transferred to Miami FIR, but we use it sometimes to find the radio call sign, not to find out who owns the aircraft.
I would have hoped that ATC software did indeed have an embedded table of Doc 8585 three-letter designators in this day and age.

I'm surprised, though, that the software doesn't also supply the controller (where necessary) with the corresponding operator callsign ("Telephony Designator" in ICAO-speak), for which Doc 8585 is also the authority. Books are so 20th Century.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 14th Nov 2022, 16:01
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Spain and Gibraltar
Posts: 156
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
On a similar theme was the Россия - Rossiya aircraft that took Sergei Lavrov to the G20 in Bali stolen, and would anyone in Bali have the cojones to impound it?
Nil by mouth is offline  
Old 14th Nov 2022, 22:35
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: London
Posts: 45
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Nil by mouth
On a similar theme was the Россия - Rossiya aircraft that took Sergei Lavrov to the G20 in Bali stolen, and would anyone in Bali have the cojones to impound it?
It's one of the Russian Government's Il-96-300PU.

You raise an interesting hypothetical though. Any other time if one of the stolen aircraft turns up in Indonesia it's likely US pressure would successfully see it impounded. But during the G20 perhaps the desire to avoid a "scene" and disrupt the focus of the summit (any more than it already has been) would prevail.

Regardless, there isn't much prestige in parking your stolen A320 next to Air Force One, so they brought the Ilyushin.
bobbytables is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2022, 06:31
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,822
Received 206 Likes on 94 Posts
Originally Posted by bobbytables
It's one of the Russian Government's Il-96-300PU.
Yes, operated by Rossiya SLO (Specialny Lyoutny Otryad) - the sub-fleet used for Government/VIP missions. All of the fleet apart from a couple of A319s are Russian-built types and I'd be surprised if any are owned by Western lessors.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2022, 11:08
  #33 (permalink)  
Pegase Driver
 
Join Date: May 1997
Location: Europe
Age: 74
Posts: 3,694
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Plus they are considered "State aircraft "in international legal terms, so same category as military. No one will touch them.
ATC Watcher is online now  
Old 15th Nov 2022, 11:14
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: London
Posts: 45
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by ATC Watcher
Plus they are considered "State aircraft "in international legal terms, so same category as military. No one will touch them.
Interestingly there is historical precedent for state aircraft being impounded, though only those of small African nations. Gabon failed to pay $8m for their cabin fitout and their 777 was consequently impounded at Orly. I think something similar happened to Congo.
bobbytables is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.