Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Airbus cancels Qatar A321 order

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Airbus cancels Qatar A321 order

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 9th Feb 2022, 12:04
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: I wouldn't know.
Posts: 4,497
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It might be. I know the GA avionic industry is already complaining quite a bit about the chip shortage and impending if not current delivery bottlenecks. Usually aircraft manufacturer have quite long lead times, so they should, in theory, not as much affected, but who knows?
Denti is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2022, 18:30
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Everett, WA
Age: 68
Posts: 4,408
Received 180 Likes on 88 Posts
Originally Posted by ATC Watcher
Whow indeed .. just wondering if the consequences of the current lack of electronic semi-conductors causing havoc in the car manufacturing industry ( up to 4 years waiting time if you order specific models today) and 6-8 months delays on previously ordered cars, is entering aircraft manufacturers.
Possible but not likely. Due to the massive certification costs of new parts (the regulators have issued guidance that changing logic devices such as CPU or ASIC is a major change), and since aircraft avionics rarely use the latest state of the art components (since it costs so much to certify a change), the suppliers tend to stockpile logic devices.

Overall, regardless of how difficult a customer Qatar might be, it's pretty hard to see this as other than a win for Boeing.
It reminds me a bit of something that happened back in the 1990s. Boeing did a deal with (IIRC) Singapore for a bunch of 777s, agreeing to take used A340s as trade-in. Airbus came out and said they would refuse product support to Airbus aircraft that had been purchased through Boeing. Boeing responding by issuing a presser that Boeing would always continue to support any Boeing aircraft, regardless of who you bought it from. This made Airbus look so bad they quickly backed down
tdracer is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2022, 18:46
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: I wouldn't know.
Posts: 4,497
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It will be a win for Boeing of course, as there is no real alternative in a duopoly if one supplier does not supply a customer anymore. However, that will be quite costly for Qatar in the end, as Boeing has absolutely no incentive anymore to give big discounts, after all where is Qatar to get any alternative? By the way, Boeing did pull a similar trick at one point, by openly refusing to sell aircraft to a company which was then forced to completely switch over to Airbus over time. That airline does not exist anymore, but the cause of that is quite an unrelated story.

That said, with the current state of the game (2020, 2021), Airbus can actually be quite relaxed about the whole thing. Not to mention that Boeing has no real answer to the A321 LR and XLR.

Last edited by Denti; 9th Feb 2022 at 19:21.
Denti is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2022, 19:53
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: London UK
Posts: 7,651
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts
Originally Posted by tdracer
It reminds me a bit of something that happened back in the 1990s. Boeing did a deal with (IIRC) Singapore for a bunch of 777s, agreeing to take used A340s as trade-in. Airbus came out and said they would refuse product support to Airbus aircraft that had been purchased through Boeing.
In the spirit of accuracy here, they weren't trade-ins as the term is normally understood; they were not used at all, they were brand new aircraft not even built yet. Boeing wanted Airbus to deliver then whitetail, and was looking to market such brand new aircraft off the Airbus production line in direct competition to new Airbus aircraft, to established A340-300 customers. Singapore had got a particularly good deal on their price because they were ordered in a single deal in conjunction with other Airbus aircraft. I believe that Boeing have a comparable agreement with Ryanair, that for the good deal on their 737s they must not sell them off before, or at, delivery.
WHBM is online now  
Old 10th Feb 2022, 15:16
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Sudbury, Suffolk
Posts: 256
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by WHBM
In the spirit of accuracy here, they weren't trade-ins as the term is normally understood; they were not used at all, they were brand new aircraft not even built yet. Boeing wanted Airbus to deliver then whitetail, and was looking to market such brand new aircraft off the Airbus production line in direct competition to new Airbus aircraft, to established A340-300 customers. Singapore had got a particularly good deal on their price because they were ordered in a single deal in conjunction with other Airbus aircraft. I believe that Boeing have a comparable agreement with Ryanair, that for the good deal on their 737s they must not sell them off before, or at, delivery.
...implying that the depth of discount from 'list' for that deal is such that Ryanair could reasonably be expected to resell the frames for a profit to customers without the same buying power. More evidence that O'Leary had a barrel of significant size over which to suspend Boeing
Maninthebar is offline  
Old 20th Feb 2022, 10:07
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Europe
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
WHBM,
Not correct according to my memory - Boeing indeed took over used SIA A340s, only two or three came directly out of TLS Into their hands.
Example: A340 MSN 117 (a “good friend of mine”), delivered to SIA 1996, transferred to Boeing around 2002
jettison valve is online now  
Old 20th Feb 2022, 14:54
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: London UK
Posts: 7,651
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts
Yes, I am aware that Boeing bought the whole SIA A340 fleet, some had been in service for some years, others were still on order and Boeing was looking to sell these on "new, unused".

Last edited by WHBM; 20th Feb 2022 at 15:16.
WHBM is online now  
Old 20th Feb 2022, 19:50
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: There and here
Posts: 2,863
Received 25 Likes on 18 Posts
Yes, I am aware that Boeing bought the whole SIA A340 fleet, some had been in service for some years, others were still on order and Boeing was looking to sell these on "new, unused".
Didn't they all end up stored in Tarbes never to fly again ?
SpringHeeledJack is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2022, 02:07
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 608
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by WHBM
Yes, I am aware that Boeing bought the whole SIA A340 fleet, some had been in service for some years, others were still on order and Boeing was looking to sell these on "new, unused".
Two of SIAs 340s went to Gulf Air

In other news, the British court that will hear the case has ordered Airbus not to give away Qatar's 321 NEO slots until after the hearing. Apparently Qatar is still fighting the cancelation.
Airmann is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2022, 02:54
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 161
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by WHBM
Yes, I am aware that Boeing bought the whole SIA A340 fleet, some had been in service for some years, others were still on order and Boeing was looking to sell these on "new, unused".
If memory serves (it was after all, around 2007), Air Canada did a similar deal and managed to fob off its A340s in trade for the B777.
Commander Taco is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2022, 16:33
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,200
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Airmann
Two of SIAs 340s went to Gulf Air

In other news, the British court that will hear the case has ordered Airbus not to give away Qatar's 321 NEO slots until after the hearing. Apparently Qatar is still fighting the cancelation.

I have flown in one of them. There is still a SIA logo in one of the toilets. How can a court oblige a seller to sell its products if the cancellation clauses are respected?
Rwy in Sight is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2022, 08:55
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Lost again...
Posts: 900
Received 120 Likes on 55 Posts
Originally Posted by Rwy in Sight
How can a court oblige a seller to sell its products if the cancellation clauses are respected?
Presumably the point of the case is that one party is claiming that the clauses have not been respected. In such a case it would not be uncommon for that party to ask the court to place a restriction on the other party to prevent them taking significant / irrevocable actions until after the case has been heard and the issue resolved
OvertHawk is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.