Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Easy Jet job cuts

Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Easy Jet job cuts

Old 30th Jun 2020, 18:05
  #61 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Liverpool
Posts: 3
So 727 jobs. How many pilots uk based? 1400?

So 50pc of uk easy pilots going?

Does anyone have a breakdown by base and role? is lifo?

Someone made the point about the loans above. Will they still be payable?
TerryCherry is online now  
Old 30th Jun 2020, 18:09
  #62 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: uk
Posts: 823
Originally Posted by CC_FlyerUK View Post
Yep, all the Head Office staff and Cabin Crew. I think it is a shame people seem to focus on "Pilots" when if it was not for the others it would be empty planes flying about - with no organisation!
The clue might be in the website name?
It doesn't mean we don;'t feel for our colleagues, but there are targeted forums for them to vent their spleen.
macdo is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2020, 18:21
  #63 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Europe
Posts: 32
what about Easyjet Switzerland then?
sonicguy is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2020, 20:45
  #64 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Europe
Posts: 141
Strength of BALPA

Originally Posted by Dannyboy39 View Post
................many of which haven't got the strength of a union like BALPA behind them.
Good luck with that...............
Maxfli is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2020, 20:56
  #65 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Dublin
Posts: 514
The proposals for Gatwick appears to be about 25% of the pilot force but much lower numbers for cabin, around 16%. Years ago the ticket staff were replaced with "machines" so there's no mileage in ground staff reductions, looks like the high cost work units are in the gunsights..
Gatwick airport forecast it will take up to 4 years to recover to pre-covid levels and it looks like a case of self fulfilling prophecies, are we talking our way into this mess!
Kirks gusset is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2020, 23:12
  #66 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: EU
Posts: 622
Originally Posted by Banana Joe View Post
And I am happy to admit I would be one of them. It's the best contract in my home country for valid reasons.
​​​​​​
​​​​​​
I think you can forget all about joining that kind of contract in the near future.
The Flying Cokeman is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2020, 01:39
  #67 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Transient
Posts: 6
Having pondered the proposed changes l now think LIFO will not apply as they are proposing reductions at all UK bases. So much for loyalty. Orange spirit my arse.
Douglas Bahada is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2020, 03:52
  #68 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Transient
Posts: 6
As feared.

"​​We will look at redeployment as part of the consultation. However given the overall headcount proposals across our business and the lack of suitable vacancies we want to be open by saying we realise it'll be unlikely that we will be able to mitigate our proposals through redeployment"

No such thing as loyalty in the modern workplace. Probably get basic redundancy payment as well.
Douglas Bahada is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2020, 08:21
  #69 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: uk
Posts: 823
Originally Posted by Douglas Bahada View Post
Having pondered the proposed changes l now think LIFO will not apply as they are proposing reductions at all UK bases. So much for loyalty. Orange spirit my arse.
Way back in the mists of time, the American boss of the large UK airline I worked for, decided that he would reduce the pilot/cc workforce due to one of the airlines regular financial hiccups. His proposal was to close 4 regional bases and get rid of the staff based there. He was somewhat put out and puzzled when the Union, having been largely asleep on the job, pointed out that we were a Seniority based airline and he couldn't do that. All of a sudden 3 of the 4 base closures were cancelled and most of the jobs saved, albeit with quite a few peeps taking part time to mitigate. When the brown stuff hits the fan, seniority and union are all that stands between you and the dole queue.
macdo is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2020, 09:14
  #70 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 40
Those of you that believe LIFO should be used as the sole method of selection for compulsory redundancy need to understand that the law has changed. The change makes all previous contracts/agreements that make LIFO the sole method of selection obsolete.

Companies and Unions can agree to whatever they like. However, it should be within the law. When the law changes then contracts of employment should also change.

Companies and BALPA should use a matrix that could include LIFO in it.

The Employment Equality (Age) Regulations 2006 and the Equality Act 2010 refers to the change in the procedures.
101917 is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2020, 10:34
  #71 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Lud
Posts: 10
Originally Posted by 101917 View Post
Those of you that believe LIFO should be used as the sole method of selection for compulsory redundancy need to understand that the law has changed. The change makes all previous contracts/agreements that make LIFO the sole method of selection obsolete.
This is certainly true but what else is there to go on? We are generally unknown to management and HR outside of our immediate base captain and line trainers. Will they have a say in the final reckoning? Training reports are rather generic these days with little to no text on them (unless there's a secret box we don't get to see saying what the trainer *really* thought) and I believe data accrued on Flap 3 landing, discretionary fuel etc. is anonymised, if that sort of thing could even be used as criteria.

Sickness? Number of fatigue reports filed? Number of times we've been in the shower when Crewing calls? I'm struggling to think of anything particularly tangible.

Good luck everyone.
Tick Tock Man is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2020, 10:52
  #72 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Liverpool
Posts: 3
I was about to say the same. How can they select? Lifo may not be ok but experience in hours is surely ok and that amounts to the same. This would mean that a FO that already had 1000 hours when they entered easyjet may keep a job even though they are the last to join? But this amounts pretty much to LIFO anyway.

There are always 'favourites' that will escape the cull. Some of easyjet's more recent recruits are more rough round the edges and would prob never have even been selected 10 years ago and definitely wouldn't have mid 2000s. Then there are those who have better communication skills, better educational background, more upper middle class.

I cannot see easy getting rid of the latter in favour of the former. They will surely keep more female pilots as well. Those who can least afford it and with the biggest debts will probably be thrown to the wolves regardless.
TerryCherry is online now  
Old 1st Jul 2020, 12:02
  #73 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Europe
Posts: 190
Over at WZZ so called "performance" was used to decide over 265 pilots who were let go. Now let me tell you that it was BS. It was down to individual base captains and mid managers to decide and by the way who were more than happy to run their purge based on personal agenda. Again, there are no unions whatsoever to speak of at WZZ. Wish you guys and gals the best. It's tough. I know.

Last edited by booze; 1st Jul 2020 at 12:17.
booze is online now  
Old 1st Jul 2020, 15:42
  #74 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Lud
Posts: 10
The only problem with using LIFO as the sole method, as far as I can make out, is that it can inadvertently lead to age discrimination and it is that, not LIFO itself, which is unlawful. If it can be demonstrated that LIFO is not discriminatory in age, i.e. there is a healthy mix of ages amongst those with the least service, then I can't see any reason in law why that should not be the primary or even only criterion. I suppose that's unlikely given the traditional progression of cadetship to internal command but it's a thought. Somebody else here may be able to clarify that.
Tick Tock Man is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2020, 15:55
  #75 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: where I lay my hat
Posts: 105
Originally Posted by TerryCherry View Post
I They will surely keep more female pilots as well. .
That would of course be completely illegal, but this is easyjet we're taking about, so you're probably right. Even in the general workforce, in the 2008-9 recession, "pale males" were disproportionately laid off, with HR managers presumably thinking to themselves "well at least these guys can't claim discrimination, so we'll target them"!

That said, in airlines generally, LIFO may tend to affect female pilots more severely, as their proportion has increased in recent years, so they are more junior

Last edited by midnight cruiser; 1st Jul 2020 at 16:08.
midnight cruiser is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information

Copyright 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.