Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Russian B737 Crash at Kazan.

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Russian B737 Crash at Kazan.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 17th Nov 2013, 19:51
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Mangakino, New Zealand
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
eu01
Many thanks for that, it doesn't appear she is on it so hopefully she got an earlier flight.
I didn't know you could get a pax list like that. It has certainly eased my concerns some.
tutu is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2013, 20:01
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Sweden
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
News reports talk about 3'rd attempt to land and accident occurring at 3rd go around. How extraordinary would one interpret the chain of events, if this is true?

I'm baffled.
Mongolf is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2013, 20:03
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: London
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Aircraft debris spread around large area suggests a high speed impact.

AucT is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2013, 20:05
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: London
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mongolf

Only one go around was initiated and aircraft came in contact with ground on go around.
AucT is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2013, 20:14
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts








Sunamer is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2013, 20:18
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Monrovia / Liberia
Age: 63
Posts: 757
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A two engine go-around in the B737 can, for a number of reasons, turn into a complete balls-up, much dependent upon the pressing (or not) of various buttons and / or the movement (or not) of various levers!
Old King Coal is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2013, 20:23
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Czech Republic
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
экипаж доложил диспетчерам, когда еще самолет находился за 500 метров до торца полосы, о непосадочном положении. Скорее всего, это может говорить о том, что была неисправна та или иная техника, какая именно, экипаж не уточнил", - отметил источник.

Он добавил, что после сообщения о неготовности к посадке экипаж попытался зайти на второй круг, однако, уже находясь над взлетно-посадочной полосой, пролетев примерно километр, самолет рухнул, ударившись носом о землю.
500m before THR the crew reports to ATC "no landing configuration". Probably some system was not prepared - the crew dont say what.

After that, already above RWY, the crew requests for GA. The plane flew approx 1km above RWY and than it hits the ground by its nose.
Karel_x is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2013, 21:13
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: chicago
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
one of the problems, besides the tragedy itself, is the poor translations.


could it be the crew wasn't in the configuration really means: they couldn't get the landing gear down?

and while screwing around trying to get the gear down, someone forgot to fly the plane first and stalled?

(all recall eastern airlines L1011).

and maybe the shaking reported by passengers on previous flight was a flap problem that only showed itself in a lowered flap configuration...and that instead of a gear problem it was a flap problem?



again, language makes me speculate to the above
flarepilot is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2013, 21:31
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Suffolk, Diss, UK
Age: 50
Posts: 677
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
eu01
Quote:
Originally Posted by NickBarnes
If it was apparent it was broken surely they wouldn't have taken off again :/
What country we are talking about?
Yes I suppose was a silly thing to put, passengers from the flight to Moscow earlier in the day reported strong vibrations before landing then a very hard landing. But on a 23 year old aircraft vibrations and rattles can be quite common I'd of thought
NickBarnes is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2013, 21:36
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Sweden
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Several Swedish news report third go around attempt, when crash occur. It seems to be "over the top" to me.

I have to assume that PPRuNe is more correct in the details.
Mongolf is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2013, 21:58
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: chicago
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
regarding older planes and shaking


I had the pleasure of flying some older transport jets, but they were exceptionally well maintained and didn't shake or rattle.

its all about spending the money on maintenace of planes, training of pilots


money...its the answer to the question of why did this, or any, plane crash?
flarepilot is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2013, 22:02
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Spain
Age: 33
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by NickBarnes
If it was apparent it was broken surely they wouldn't have taken off again :/
2 years ago that same airline let 6 passengers travel on foot on a nearly 5 hour flight because of overbooking.
achobg is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2013, 23:58
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,569
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Aircraft debris spread around large area suggests a high speed impact.
more a flat impact than high speed. Of course everything is relative. So far I don't see a clue in this as yet.
lomapaseo is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2013, 01:30
  #34 (permalink)  
VFD
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: us
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
and maybe the shaking reported by passengers on previous flight was a flap problem that only showed itself in a lowered flap configuration...and that instead of a gear problem it was a flap problem
With little else to go on that would surely come up high on the list.
There maybe been an asymmetry problem that occurred on previous flight due to a broken part that just got reset or did not show itself on the ground with no loading and inadequate inspection.

Suddenly losing a flap panel during extension somewhere between 0 and 25 would cause some serious control issues without time to recover that close to terra firma.

Only speculation of course.
VFD is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2013, 03:10
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: US
Posts: 2,205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Vertigo? Acceleration causing vertigo resulting in crashes just past the departure end of the runway was a known factor in IMC fighter departures/go-arounds.

Last edited by misd-agin; 18th Nov 2013 at 03:11. Reason: added 'IMC'
misd-agin is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2013, 03:39
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Not far from a big Lake
Age: 82
Posts: 1,454
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Do not know if it is applicable in this case, but the quickest way to plant an aircraft on its nose is to lose control in the roll direction-for whatever cause.

You would have to work hard to stuff the nose down on an accelerating aircraft that does not autotrim.

There seem to be somewhat larger pieces of the tail section visible in one of the night photos I've seen. Most everything else visible is broken up pretty well.

Last edited by Machinbird; 18th Nov 2013 at 03:42. Reason: duplicate word
Machinbird is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2013, 04:09
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: us
Age: 64
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The phrase "непосадочное положение" (non-landing position if translated literally) simply means they were not lined up correctly (too low too high off to the left/right)
vovachan is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2013, 04:21
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Southern Shores of Lusitania Kingdom
Age: 53
Posts: 858
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Waiting patient for the first official and preliminary report issued by the competent investigation teams, what i really could foresee now its some dark clouds hovering above the Tatarstan Airlines roofs...having in mind all the previous Russian Accidents&Incidents with other Russian Airline(rs), i cannot see any deviation here by the MAK and Rosaviatsia policy on the crash aftermath...lets hope im wrong, just my 2 cents.
TAK its already starting slowly their new Airbus fleet for some time.
JanetFlight is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2013, 05:31
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Moscow
Age: 52
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well it was gusting upto 30 at the time of landing in DME.
Also the old concrete runways at DME are in horrendous state.
paulmoscow is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2013, 05:54
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: US/EU
Posts: 694
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
According to the NY Times, "President Vladimir V. Putin ordered officials to set up a commission to investigate the crash, his spokesman, Dmitri S. Peskov, told local news agencies."

Isn't this a bit unusual? Isn't there already an agency in Russia like the US NTSB whose responsibility it is to investigate the causes of these crashes?

May this be due to the two political passengers on board, who happen to be "Aleksandr V. Antonov, 56, the regional head of Russia’s Federal Security Service, known as the F.S.B., as well as Irek Minnikhanov, 24, a son of the president of the Tatarstan region, Rustam Minnikhanov," according to the Times?
Mark in CA is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.