Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Yak42 crash, Russia

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Yak42 crash, Russia

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12th Sep 2011, 21:26
  #101 (permalink)  
Psychophysiological entity
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Tweet Rob_Benham Famous author. Well, slightly famous.
Age: 84
Posts: 3,270
Received 37 Likes on 18 Posts
Rather high direct operating costs.
Loose rivets is offline  
Old 12th Sep 2011, 21:38
  #102 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: us
Age: 64
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
6500 hrs in 18 years? Average app. 360 hrs per year?
this being a charter plane in a VIP configuration
vovachan is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2011, 00:43
  #103 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Could this video help?

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=080_1315676582
.
Nervous SLF is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2011, 00:51
  #104 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: La Belle Province
Posts: 2,179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
hmm

That last video appears to show the nose lifting, since it seems to be the belly that hits the camera, not the nose or nosewheel.

That would seem to rule out flight control issues causing inability to rotate...?

The quality is so low I dont think you could hope to tell if the brakes were smoking - other than not trailing a huge plume of smoke, you just cant tell (well, i cant)
Mad (Flt) Scientist is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2011, 03:22
  #105 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Not far from a big Lake
Age: 82
Posts: 1,454
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That last video appears to show the nose lifting
Yes, I saw the shadow of the airborne nose gear in one frame. Meanwhile the distance between the belly and the ground seems to disappear. I wonder if the tail left a divot in the dirt?
The relatively high camera perspective does not clearly show ground-tail contact during rotation-but it is close.
Machinbird is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2011, 09:34
  #106 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: world
Posts: 3,424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
With respect, this video was already on the first pages of this thread so I can't see that you're posting anything new, but just repeating what's already been covered.
Hotel Tango is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2011, 11:59
  #107 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Cork
Age: 45
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Different video, the one above is new.
widebody69 is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2011, 14:41
  #108 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 1,011
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
All three are from one source (LifeNews aka Russian "Sunday Mirror" yellowpaper newsagency) but from different hostings.

This one more interesting, I think - view to runaway from taxi #4:



© from ru_aviation:
Kulverstukas is offline  
Old 14th Sep 2011, 00:20
  #109 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Toronto
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
MK.ru reports that the pilot took ill only minutes before take off and handed off duties to the co-pilot. Early discoveries suggest that the handbrake on the plane wasn't released. This seems very hard to believe.....or is it?
ensco is offline  
Old 14th Sep 2011, 01:53
  #110 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Google Translate:
According to our source, the credible, the commission has found that the plane began to crackdown on the runway with the parking brake nevyklyuchennym. This device - analog handbrake in a car - used only for parking. Engine power is enough that the aircraft moved from its place, being on the parking brake (as well as some forgetful motorists gets under way on the "hammer") and have driven on a taxiway to the runway. But to accelerate to takeoff speed is already becoming problematic.

In addition, the source said, "MK", ​​which, according to the transcripts of the speech recorder Yak-42, immediately before takeoff the aircraft commander ordered Andrew Solomentsev second pilot Igor Zhevelovu to take it over, citing poor health.

The parking brake was off just a commander. But perhaps the moment of transfer of control of the pilots just forgot it and did not pay attention to the corresponding signal on the dashboard (beep it is not duplicated).

Neisklyucheno that when the Yak-42 began to accelerate for takeoff and could not gain the required speed, the pilots noticed a mistake and turned off the brake.
I wonder if the brakes would have had trouble disengaging after the amount of energy that would of been placed into it.
Phalanger is offline  
Old 14th Sep 2011, 09:32
  #111 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 1,011
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yak-42 "Proton" # 42434 Cabin configuration







Kulverstukas is offline  
Old 14th Sep 2011, 10:15
  #112 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 1,011
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Broken ILS mast









Wheel trails on the grass of КТП



Light masts?



© -42. :
Kulverstukas is offline  
Old 14th Sep 2011, 13:07
  #113 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Stairways to heaven
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
first finding states that the flight supposedly forget the "hand break" at take-off resulting in a forced rotation meters before end of runway.
jackx123 is offline  
Old 14th Sep 2011, 19:10
  #114 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Sweden
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Swedish media reports that the PIC forgot to retract the speedbrakes (early reporting of handbrake was allegedly a misunderstanding by the reporting media) that were deployed during take off roll... !
Grassfield is offline  
Old 14th Sep 2011, 20:03
  #115 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: us
Age: 64
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The authorities are now saying the are discounting the brakes theory but are considering a nose-heavy plane because most passengers and cargo were located up front
vovachan is offline  
Old 14th Sep 2011, 20:20
  #116 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: next to a beautiful lake
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
but the video of the Yak hitting the camera shows the nose clearly being up, i.e. NG off the ground. So a nose heavy condition can be somehow excluded, no ?
and what's behind the alleged health issue of the commander ? let's not go that way will we...
HeadingSouth is offline  
Old 14th Sep 2011, 20:58
  #117 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Sweden
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ehhh, Swedish some media report speedbrakes extended and some report parkingbrake set... so please take my eaerlier speedbrake comment with a pinch of salt.

Other sensational media reports the pilot never had flown Yak 42 before but only Yak 40s. I don't know the truth of such allegation but after a quick search on Wikipedia, it is clear that the difference between the two is fairly substantial (the 42 is 4x heavier and takes 4x the pax) in case he was not used to the 42...
Grassfield is offline  
Old 14th Sep 2011, 23:40
  #118 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Not far from a big Lake
Age: 82
Posts: 1,454
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Eh? Why would the speedbrakes be deployed in the first place?
Good question.
No throttle position based-speedbrake interlock?? If so, that would be begging for trouble.
Where are the speed brakes located on the Yak 42?
Machinbird is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2011, 00:42
  #119 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: La Belle Province
Posts: 2,179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by HeadingSouth
but the video of the Yak hitting the camera shows the nose clearly being up, i.e. NG off the ground. So a nose heavy condition can be somehow excluded, no ?
Not necessarily. An aircraft which is nose heavy will perhaps not rotate at the scheduled Vr, or perhaps will only rotate slowly, but as speed increases the aerodynamic force of the tail acting to raise the nose will eventually, by the power of "Q", overcome the weight moment. Problem is, if you run out of runway before that can happen ...
Mad (Flt) Scientist is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2011, 02:13
  #120 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 951
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Problem is, if you run out of runway before that can happen ...
This was mentioned over on the reject beyond V1 thread. Two overrun accidents in which the crew were unable to rotate the airplane and rejected were cited. An aircraft which fails to rotate due to misloading, mistrimming or flight control malfunction may leave it's flightcrew in the unenviable position of having to decide which is the lesser threat. Reject with an overrun or continue trying to get it in the air and potentially not make it.

There isn't nearly enough reliable information yet concerning this accident to make even an educated guess as to whether or not any of those things happened here. It's as good a guess as any and better than most though.


Some investigative work product which might tend to rule some potential causal factors either in or out:

Lab findings regarding the nature of any heat damage to brake units.
FDR traces indicating engine parameters.
FDR airspeed/time history
CVR transcript (translated)
An accounting of actual takeoff weight.

These bits of info are just a few items on a long list of things to be determined. I haven't a clue how quickly the investigation will proceed or how much will be revealed to the public, but I'll keep a watch on this thread for any updates.
westhawk is online now  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.