Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Saha Air 707 loses 2 on climb out

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Saha Air 707 loses 2 on climb out

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7th Aug 2009, 17:56
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: away from home
Posts: 895
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The DC-8s were the same, ours were sourced from several different original customers and almost nothing could be found in the same places.
Worst of all were the ex-Air Canada things they tried to convert into a 2 crew cockpit (never flown that way to my knowledge) and scattered 2/3s of the FE panel around the pilots.
oceancrosser is offline  
Old 9th Aug 2009, 09:31
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Surrey, UK ;
Age: 71
Posts: 1,155
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
And I thought the "find how the radio works" game only applied to PA-28s
Dave Gittins is offline  
Old 9th Aug 2009, 09:49
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: In a far better place
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I never knew that TWA could reinvent the cockpit until actually flying a -231. Some good, and some bad.

Sure went through alot of landing lights though.
captjns is offline  
Old 9th Aug 2009, 11:26
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Wiltshire
Age: 82
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
History .....

N712PA a JT3 engined 707 from Pan Am's initial 6 lost the No 4 engine over France on 25th February 1959 in a training incident, it landed at Heathrow and was repaired in the Pan Am hangar.

N712PA had been involved in a near 30,000 ft dive over the Atlantic three weeks earlier where it got close to Mach1...possible autopilot malfunction ..... No 3 dos'nt look to clever either!! ..... nobody checked the engine mounts?.
Entaxei is offline  
Old 10th Aug 2009, 17:43
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Geneva, Switzerland
Age: 58
Posts: 1,908
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Any idea of the history of the plane involved here (was it originally delivered to Iran in the 70's) ?
atakacs is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2009, 04:55
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: phoenix, AZ, USA
Posts: 245
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Boeing fleets at my airline were all standardized - until the second jet showed up on the line.
cactusbusdrvr is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2009, 16:24
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: No one's home...
Posts: 416
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not a true 707 but rather the REAL 717.. when I went through Instructor school on the KC-135 we did 2 engine out (same side, in idle) approaches and go-arounds. Once we had demonstrated that we did 3 engines in idle and a single engine (sort of) pattern with an approach and go around. Gear when you were assured you had the field.. flaps 30. On the go, MAX thrust, lots of rudder and gear up with the slightest hint of positive rate. Milk the flaps back up SLOWLY and climb out. Not easy but did not require a superman.

Long time ago...
wileydog3 is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2009, 16:55
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Devon
Age: 68
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Plane was originally delivered to the Iranian Government - model 707-3JPC
Bigt is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2009, 17:03
  #29 (permalink)  
PJ2
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: BC
Age: 76
Posts: 2,484
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
oceancrosser;
Worst of all were the ex-Air Canada things they tried to convert into a 2 crew cockpit (never flown that way to my knowledge) and scattered 2/3s of the FE panel around the pilots.
You are correct. I had originally posted that it was Douglas that tried this but I recall now years ago seeing some Canadian Pacific Airlines DC8s and their cockpits were completely different - F/O seat on regular instead of long rails, a proper Engineer's panel with all the systems at the back. On the Trans-Canada (later Air Canada) DC8s, except for fuel and electrical, the systems were mostly on the front, center panels if I recall. Cockpit standardization has come a long way, enhancing flight safety in doing so.
PJ2 is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2009, 19:36
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: In a far better place
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ooops.... CIRCUITB... should have specified the 727-231 series x-TWA birds.
captjns is offline  
Old 12th Aug 2009, 12:21
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: MAN/Wherever
Age: 62
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts


superspotter is offline  
Old 12th Aug 2009, 14:35
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,569
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Finally some facts about the incident

Thanks superspotter for the pics. I wish there were more but I couldn't navigate the forum that they came from

The #1 engine probably would have been only slightly damaged from FOD into the inlet. #2 looks like a possible overspeed when I brighten up the picture. I don't recall a similar looking failure since AAL Nov 1960 over Albany NY
lomapaseo is offline  
Old 12th Aug 2009, 14:35
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Geneva, Switzerland
Age: 58
Posts: 1,908
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Meanwhile back at the 707 ...bit of a mess innit ! ... looks lucky the exploding bits of JT3 didn't bring out out of the sky. Could have been an Airtours at Manchester again but at 3,000 ft !!
indeed

what was the sequence of event here ? did they loose the second engine due to debris ingestion (quite possible given what we see on those pictures).

In any case hat tip to the crew...
atakacs is offline  
Old 12th Aug 2009, 18:56
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Arizona USA
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Could have been an Airtours at Manchester again but at 3,000 ft !!
Highly unlikely whilst airbourne....besides the specific type has four engines, no similarity whatsoever with the Manchester accident.
411A is offline  
Old 12th Aug 2009, 19:45
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: UK
Age: 66
Posts: 846
Received 41 Likes on 21 Posts
411a

wow u flew 707-320/420/320b/c and 707-138b
did you ever fly them into the UK?

i flew on british eagle 707-138b as a child which (both a/c) went to laker
g-avzz and g-awdg
great little ships they were...
always at LGW for many years...
often i was at laker hangars and visited them

also flew on BEA airtours -436's many times too

my first BIG 707 flight was LGW-PMI on 707-349C of caledonian in 1969
g-awwd home on g-avka -399c flagship bonnie scotland
flt time of 1hr 20 mins !

when i joined BMA we had coal-burning -321's ex PAA (6)
then we got 3 -320C's and eventually fitted 212Y seats in them for charters.
interesting load sheets for LGW-LAX non-stop with 212Y on board in august...lol

incredible feat for this Iran 707 to safely get back on the ground after losing 2 on same side...174 pax on board so was not that light.

often our chaps at BMA were talking of the odds of losing 2 same-side out of LGW on 27 (26 now) and clearing the hills on a hot day.
rog747 is offline  
Old 12th Aug 2009, 21:30
  #36 (permalink)  
quidquid excusatio prandium pro
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: New York
Posts: 349
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
On a related note, the mil variant of the 707, a KC-135, impacted shortly after takeoff at Elmendorf, Anchorage, after ingesting several Canada geese and losing two on the same side, in the early nineties I recall.

Impressive stick job by the Iranian crew, Sullenberger kudos all 'round (he knows geese), not an easy event by anyone's standard.
bugg smasher is offline  
Old 13th Aug 2009, 01:58
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Arizona USA
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
did you ever fly them into the UK?
Numerous times...-320B (advanced) mostly, occasionally the -138B.
411A is offline  
Old 13th Aug 2009, 04:31
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Surrey, UK ;
Age: 71
Posts: 1,155
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
If you lost a couple coming out of Gatwick 26, at laest (if you cleared the hills) at least you had Dunsfold to go to without much manoevering on two..
Dave Gittins is offline  
Old 13th Aug 2009, 09:42
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: In a far better place
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
cactusbusdrvr

The Boeing fleets at my airline were all standardized - until the second jet showed up on the line
Yeah... I remember in 1990 the diffrences manual was thicker than the AOM too
captjns is offline  
Old 13th Aug 2009, 12:56
  #40 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,430
Received 1,594 Likes on 731 Posts
On a related note, the mil variant of the 707, a KC-135, impacted shortly after takeoff at Elmendorf, Anchorage, after ingesting several Canada geese and losing two on the same side, in the early nineties I recall.
No, it wasn't a KC-135, it was an E-3A, Yukla27, with 24 POB.
ORAC is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.