DHL UK changes
Still Trampin' the Ramp
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Right in the middle of UK
Age: 76
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
myrddin, OK, I'll rise to the bait! My understanding is that not all the B727s will accumulate dust as soon as originally planned & 1 or 2 will remain on the IAOC for ad hoc work. Add the Hercs & the management contract for the Aeropostal A300s & I reckon the IAOC will be reasonably well used. As for your comments regarding the A300s, I guess you're a Boeing fan 'cos the Busses will soldier on with the likes of DHL for quite a few years yet.
The more I look at it, the more it seems that the management of both companies are trying their best to ensure a viable future for everybody involved. Makes a change these days! Then again, I'm a cynical optimist(?).
The more I look at it, the more it seems that the management of both companies are trying their best to ensure a viable future for everybody involved. Makes a change these days! Then again, I'm a cynical optimist(?).
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Salisbury Plain
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ramp, there's no need to rise to any bait, there's nothing fishy about my concerns. Can you tell which part of the planet are B727 able to fly with any commercial viability and where we ourselves would want to be with them? Also what makes you think that the volume that the A300 has on offer is desirable to DHL given its current ratio of wide body to narrow body and its future plans to acquire 34 narrow body aircraft with an option on another 10? Is an ageing wide bodied aircraft with an over populated flight deck with the ability to carry 30 tonnes short haul but not medium haul, really going to fit in with DHL's near term plans? I wonder! I don't wish to sound like the harbinger of gloom, should I/we be looking else where? Will this posting be the catylst that sparks a deluge of facts. Your not old you were just born too early, so given your extra experience; whats going on? Who d'ya Know?
Join Date: Mar 1999
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I suppose it all depends on your opinion, which to me seems a little blinkered. The A300 offers 45 tonnes short haul and Channel used there aircraft on the route from Germany to Sharjah.Is that no medium enough?
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: A Galaxy, far, far Away
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ivan is right though, the Airbus A300B4 does have the range to fly from Northern Europe to the Middle East with a full payload (45000KG).Tel Aviv can be easily reached, and even Dubai is possible, but not always ! You need some help from mother nature, and you need to have an enroute alternate, since you will most definetely be low on fuel once you get there.
[ 11 January 2002: Message edited by: Sir_Fly-a-Lot ]</p>
[ 11 January 2002: Message edited by: Sir_Fly-a-Lot ]</p>
Still Trampin' the Ramp
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Right in the middle of UK
Age: 76
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
myrddin, it looks like you've got part of the answer already from Ivan & SFAL. The A300B4 will uplift 45 tons on the short-medium routes with plenty of volume. It's ideal for the main hub to hub & other high volume routes & DHL, among others, have no plans to replace them in the short to medium term, there's at least 5 - 8 more years in them yet. There is no viable replacement available in the weight/price range right now & if they're that bad, why would UPS order 60 new build -600s & FedEx is buying up A300s & A310s for conversion? OK, so the B4 is old but the ecomomics of the operation have to be weighed against the low purchase price right now bringing the hourly cost of operation, especially the ton/kilometer rate down to acceptable levels. As a pure cargo aircraft they do leave something to be desired but it's 'horses for courses' & right now the A300-B4 is the right steed for the integrators.
The 34 B757s will replace the B727s on night operations as it is night bans that are killing the 72 in integrator service. The whole idea is to leave as late as possible, hub during the night & arrive back at destination as early as possible, thus putting them in the middle of the most sensitive period. There are, however, still airports in Europe that will accept them during the day which will allow ad hoc operations plus the rest of the world, Africa, Middle East, Far East & even the USA, which are nowhere near as restrictive. The 72 is not dead yet just, like me, getting old & can't stand the late nights anymore.
To get back to the main point of the thread, the changes that are taking place have got to be preferable to any of the alternatives. I'm not pretending to be that far up the food chain that I have all the answers but I've got enough 'gen' to make a reasoned guess at what's going on & feel that, with all the gloom & doom thats being spread in other parts of these forums, this still looks like a light at the end of the tunnel & it ain't the train coming the other way! That's still only my considered opinion, however. What about the rest of you guys???
(edited for bad spelling!)
[ 11 January 2002: Message edited by: RampTramp ]</p>
The 34 B757s will replace the B727s on night operations as it is night bans that are killing the 72 in integrator service. The whole idea is to leave as late as possible, hub during the night & arrive back at destination as early as possible, thus putting them in the middle of the most sensitive period. There are, however, still airports in Europe that will accept them during the day which will allow ad hoc operations plus the rest of the world, Africa, Middle East, Far East & even the USA, which are nowhere near as restrictive. The 72 is not dead yet just, like me, getting old & can't stand the late nights anymore.
To get back to the main point of the thread, the changes that are taking place have got to be preferable to any of the alternatives. I'm not pretending to be that far up the food chain that I have all the answers but I've got enough 'gen' to make a reasoned guess at what's going on & feel that, with all the gloom & doom thats being spread in other parts of these forums, this still looks like a light at the end of the tunnel & it ain't the train coming the other way! That's still only my considered opinion, however. What about the rest of you guys???
(edited for bad spelling!)
[ 11 January 2002: Message edited by: RampTramp ]</p>
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Around
Age: 56
Posts: 572
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
DHL regularly operated the A300 on routes from BRU to LOS and BAH; to BAH with the odd fuel stop in LCA but capable of non-stop with reduced payload.
Although the max payload on the A300 is above 40 tons, DHL rarely utilies this as they aircraft are full by volume around 35 tons.
The A300 was brought in as the replacement for the long diesel 8s, and offered more payload, much more volume and considerable operational savings. Yes it's a 3 crew kite, but the alternative would have been the A300-600, which are much more expensive and not readily available second hand in the sme numbers as the B4-200. DHL does not buy new. In short, the A300s offered DHL the only viable growth potential, and continues to provide excellent service.
The B757SF and A300 uses the same ULD types and therefore compatibility from a cargo point of view is not a problem. Obviously the 757s won't accept the widebody lowerdeck ULDs. And as with the A300 DHL will normally not be utilising the full 28 tons capability of the B757SF, but will top out on volume around 23 tons.
So Myrr, we're happy with both the A300 and B757.
Although the max payload on the A300 is above 40 tons, DHL rarely utilies this as they aircraft are full by volume around 35 tons.
The A300 was brought in as the replacement for the long diesel 8s, and offered more payload, much more volume and considerable operational savings. Yes it's a 3 crew kite, but the alternative would have been the A300-600, which are much more expensive and not readily available second hand in the sme numbers as the B4-200. DHL does not buy new. In short, the A300s offered DHL the only viable growth potential, and continues to provide excellent service.
The B757SF and A300 uses the same ULD types and therefore compatibility from a cargo point of view is not a problem. Obviously the 757s won't accept the widebody lowerdeck ULDs. And as with the A300 DHL will normally not be utilising the full 28 tons capability of the B757SF, but will top out on volume around 23 tons.
So Myrr, we're happy with both the A300 and B757.
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Dzherzhinsky Square
Posts: 403
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
EAT are running a course for three A300 crews at the moment and for another three crews next month (taken from EAT noticeboard). Are these crews gonna operate the ACL A300s when they come across and if so what happens to the ACL guys?
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: A Galaxy, far, far Away
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I was told yesterday that ACL is taking on two more Shreiner A300 crews on a two year contract. So it looks like they won't be converting any 727 crews soon. Thus the 727's will we around for quite some time. Could be wrong though...
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: europe
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It seems to me the B727 ACL guys are either being saved for 757 conversion or they are down the road. What about the B727 F/Es? They do not seem to fit in anywhere in the new plan. All seems good news for management bad news for crew. <img src="frown.gif" border="0">
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Eu
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have been reading the comments by Ramp Tramp and Chris cargo. On this subject surely if the A300 of EAT are returned from ACL,and the two A300 you say are owned by ACL are to be dry leased, and the Air Postal contract of ACL is dry lease and ACL are getting shot of say 4 B727. You dont need an A in maths to see that ACL is going to have surplus of pilots and flight engineers.Whats ACL like when it comes to spending money retraining crews?
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Salisbury Plain
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
At last the penny drops. You guys, especially Ramp tramp have been clutching at straws. Not only are we surplus to requirements but will not be transfered to DHL Air because we are not type rated. Furthermore I overheard in BRU the other night that DHL are downsizing the Euro network the first casualties of which will be the A300's. Now does it all fit. We've been duped by Hugh Flynn. He's alright we're all screwed. I'm outta here
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Salisbury Plain
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
One other thing I've noticed. Can Hugh Flynn become an accountable manager of DHL Air. I confess that my knowledge of the regulations here is not too good, can somebody help me out here? As I understand it, non EU nationals are precluded from becoming post holders in a UK registered airline. If the CAA reject him as a post holder he hasn't much of a leg to stand on. Am I a right here? Can someone clarify this please
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: europe
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Millair
ACL A300 crews to work for EAT. Sounds great until the Belgium goverment insist that EAT give the jobs to all the Sabena crews out of work.Things are not looking good.
Neil
Full marks for looking on the bright side, but if I were you get in your spacecraft and go back to planet Zog.!
<img src="frown.gif" border="0">
ACL A300 crews to work for EAT. Sounds great until the Belgium goverment insist that EAT give the jobs to all the Sabena crews out of work.Things are not looking good.
Neil
Full marks for looking on the bright side, but if I were you get in your spacecraft and go back to planet Zog.!
<img src="frown.gif" border="0">
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Eu
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Butting in again, I agree with Chris Cargo EAT are taking ex Sabena crews and retraining 727 crews, if you add the A300 crews from ACL it looks like a surplus.Not sure who going to take the long walk.
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: At work
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I M Sparticus
ACL 727 Pilots will be offered jobs at DHL Air once they pass the selection criteria, sim assessment etc. This has been made known to DHL Air and is a valid attempt to provide jobs to ACL Pilots by DHL
Not sure about ACL A300 crews being offered job at DHL Air if they are also offered an EAT job. On the lines of previous threads - possibility of ACL A300 Pilot to DHL Air, thus releasing a A300 job to a Belgian?.
Bit expensive though..
DHL Air would welcome any ACL Crews as they are freight minded and won't foxtrot oscar when any up turn in the pax market arrives. The ACL A300 crews might prefer EAT anyway given their days off patterns.
<img src="confused.gif" border="0">
ACL 727 Pilots will be offered jobs at DHL Air once they pass the selection criteria, sim assessment etc. This has been made known to DHL Air and is a valid attempt to provide jobs to ACL Pilots by DHL
Not sure about ACL A300 crews being offered job at DHL Air if they are also offered an EAT job. On the lines of previous threads - possibility of ACL A300 Pilot to DHL Air, thus releasing a A300 job to a Belgian?.
Bit expensive though..
DHL Air would welcome any ACL Crews as they are freight minded and won't foxtrot oscar when any up turn in the pax market arrives. The ACL A300 crews might prefer EAT anyway given their days off patterns.
<img src="confused.gif" border="0">