BA038 (B777) Thread
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Durham
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Grip The Nettle
Heat the fuel lines, make sure the pumps don't cavitate, condition the fuel as necessary, and insulate/heat the tanks AND make sure the software/hardware to monitor this works...as in "able to talk to each other"..maybe even developed as one unit!!
I bet $50k that somewhere there is a memo to the same sitting in a desk somewhere..... It is a sad reflection on humanity that problems like this in times of war are solved quickly.
I bet $50k that somewhere there is a memo to the same sitting in a desk somewhere..... It is a sad reflection on humanity that problems like this in times of war are solved quickly.
DERG, I am not sure I am following you here.
First you suggest the problem is not identified...
Then start suggesting solutions relating to fuel ice!
As I understand it, the AAIB identified fuel ice as the 'most probable' cause and solutions are being worked upon as we speak, with modified SOP in the interim. So your issue is?
Incidentally, you suggest to...
I would suggest that cavitation was more of a symptom that a cause. And dare I even suggest it was an important clue.
First you suggest the problem is not identified...
I find it very disturbing why the reason for this failure cannot be found.
As I understand it, the AAIB identified fuel ice as the 'most probable' cause and solutions are being worked upon as we speak, with modified SOP in the interim. So your issue is?
Incidentally, you suggest to...
make sure the pumps don't cavitate
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: NSW Australia
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What became of the BA 777
It has been some time now since a BA 777 arrived just short of the runway in London, and after the company announced there would be a report out in 30 days (after the incident) all has gone quiet, I do live under a rock, but has anyone else heard anything??
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Newcastle
Age: 45
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You must live under a rock!!! There is a large thread relating to this incident!! The roll back was caused by a build up of ice in the fuel heat exchange. The plane had gone through some extremely cold air on it's route to lhr. RR has reworked the plate exchange now I believe. The plane was wrote off.
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: San Diego
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
M.Mouse
I did not know it was on the autopilot all the way! It was!, until it reached 108 Kts! Obviously the crew was never trained too utilize the Aux. Power available in the leading edge form of the wing in a dive attitude! Why is everyone flying around on the dumb auto pilot? Where is the control feel! First indicaton of power reduction, nose over into required dive attitude to maintain flying speed, increase dive angle to increase system kinetic energy. Over the fence, flare into a level flight attitude (in ground effect) hold level flight attitude while the aircraft disipates excess kinetic energy and settles into ground contact. Get back to your basic flying skills, dont trust a dumb auto-pilot that will lead you right down to a critical108kts airspeed!
Join Date: May 2006
Location: London
Age: 69
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
No, that is a possibility which has only been indicated by unrepresentative tests.
There is no present solution, and it would seem that any solution (assuming the basic conditions were as stated in the two interim reports) will involve new behaviour of fuel/water mixtures and a re-examination of ALL existing designs, not just the BA038 airframe/engine combination.
There is no present solution, and it would seem that any solution (assuming the basic conditions were as stated in the two interim reports) will involve new behaviour of fuel/water mixtures and a re-examination of ALL existing designs, not just the BA038 airframe/engine combination.
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: EGMH..a down, not yet out, formerly awesome airfield
Age: 55
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
audio/video
I see that audio/video captured live at the incident has appeared. I Assume it is new as I have not seen it before? British Airways flight 038 traffic control video, 17 Jan 2008 - Wikileaks
Just another number
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Age: 76
Posts: 1,077
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
lomapaseo
Norton didn't find anything wrong with it. It sounds pretty genuine to me.
Here is a direct link to the tape;
http://88.80.16.63/leak/ba-038-air-t...ntrol-tape.wmv
Norton didn't find anything wrong with it. It sounds pretty genuine to me.
Here is a direct link to the tape;
http://88.80.16.63/leak/ba-038-air-t...ntrol-tape.wmv
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It is confirmed by flight global as genuine recording.
Audio record captures orderly BA 777 crash response
Audio record captures orderly BA 777 crash response
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkshire, UK
Age: 79
Posts: 8,268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thankfully, the clip has been erased from another forum on here.. Publishing it almost certainly contravenes the WT Act unless it is published with proper authority.
Warning Toxic!
Disgusted of Tunbridge
Disgusted of Tunbridge
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hampshire, UK
Posts: 4,011
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Maybe it shouldn't be on, and maybe I shouldn't have listened, but I did. I have to say the ATC was brilliant and how very cool and efficiently it was handled by all involved give there was no warning at all.
Guest
Posts: n/a
As heartwarming as the response by all was, it only underscores the severity of the problem, and as such, without reflection, deflects directed comment, as it were. In other words, it is off thread.
Likewise the 'Heroism' of the crew. Noted, on other threads.
This problem has not gone away, not as it would be framed openly in the industry anyway, and the 'fix' is a palliative, a poor one.
bear
Likewise the 'Heroism' of the crew. Noted, on other threads.
This problem has not gone away, not as it would be framed openly in the industry anyway, and the 'fix' is a palliative, a poor one.
bear
Maybe it shouldn't be on, and maybe I shouldn't have listened, but I did. I have to say the ATC was brilliant and how very cool and efficiently it was handled by all involved give there was no warning at all.
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: England
Posts: 730
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Fargoo... That doesn't mean it should appear on here too! Would you like it if you were involved in a major incident and had your words spread all over??
What's with the attitude? I was just letting you know it's on the Flight Global site too. No need to have a go
A little respect for your fellow forum users goes a long way
Warning Toxic!
Disgusted of Tunbridge
Disgusted of Tunbridge
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hampshire, UK
Posts: 4,011
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It was produced by NATS for internal use, someone needs a seriously hefty kick up the jacksy for leaking it out.
Join Date: May 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 796
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It's nothing to do with the WT act, I couldn't give a fig about that.
The fact does remain though that it was an internal NATS production, produced by and for NATS, ŠNATS and to the best of my knowledge was never intended to be released outside of NATS. The fact also that it is not the full article but a part of it also suggests it has been removed surreptitiously.
I hope NATS are able to track who had access to it and find out who leaked because NATS has a lot of training material such as this (though not always as dramatic!) containing real r/t and radar recordings of incidents and I don't want to think that I or my colleagues are in store for more stuff escaping into the public domain.
The flight deckers round here might not be too impressed if more escapes either because much of it doesn't reflect particularly well...
The fact does remain though that it was an internal NATS production, produced by and for NATS, ŠNATS and to the best of my knowledge was never intended to be released outside of NATS. The fact also that it is not the full article but a part of it also suggests it has been removed surreptitiously.
I hope NATS are able to track who had access to it and find out who leaked because NATS has a lot of training material such as this (though not always as dramatic!) containing real r/t and radar recordings of incidents and I don't want to think that I or my colleagues are in store for more stuff escaping into the public domain.
The flight deckers round here might not be too impressed if more escapes either because much of it doesn't reflect particularly well...