Pardon the Loud Noise, Captain...
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Texas, like a whole other country
Posts: 444
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
1 Post
If anyone didnt yet read it, it starts with a terrorists crashing a 747 into the Capitol building, killing the President.....
Dangers of a ND notwithstanding, it appears the FFDO program may be designed as a last resort before the fast jets take over with their own weaponry. Gruesome though it may be, is that not the likely fate of any commercial aircraft in the West that doesn't comply with ATC etc.? Whether it reached that point by someone overcoming an air marshall, a reinforced door or armed pilot seems a bit academic once it has occurred.
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: EGHP
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
CB - I guess you are right about the title, it was along time ago when I read it. The point is that is was in print before 911.
Re your 2nd para.
The main question on the thread is guns on the flight deck or not??
What happens after the terrorists have control is another matter entirely.
And I hope to hell that an a/c is not shot down in the European part of the West for not 'complying with ATC'.
There could be many genuine reasons for that.
Re your 2nd para.
The main question on the thread is guns on the flight deck or not??
What happens after the terrorists have control is another matter entirely.
And I hope to hell that an a/c is not shot down in the European part of the West for not 'complying with ATC'.
There could be many genuine reasons for that.
Interesting thought...
Does Kevlar (in a Flak Jacket) show-up on X-Ray machines???
Does Kevlar (in a Flak Jacket) show-up on X-Ray machines???
In the interests that this thread has gotten so broad in content I respectably decline to answer further questions about this in this thread.
Lead heads
Quote:
Most of the pro gun posters can't see past pulling the trigger!
Given that a (handgun) bullet proof vest can easily be disguised and concealed in hand baggage, the first shot would have to be to the head.
I'm told this is not easy, even at close quarters.
or maybe the bomb sniffing machines can be tuned to detect Kevlar?
Well then, lets run with your thought and see what makes sense:
If your cockpit door gets attacked from the cabin and gives way to reveal a terrorist wearing a bullet proof vest, are you going to prefer (at THAT moment) to be armed or unarmed?
Most of the pro gun posters can't see past pulling the trigger!
Given that a (handgun) bullet proof vest can easily be disguised and concealed in hand baggage, the first shot would have to be to the head.
I'm told this is not easy, even at close quarters.
or maybe the bomb sniffing machines can be tuned to detect Kevlar?
Well then, lets run with your thought and see what makes sense:
If your cockpit door gets attacked from the cabin and gives way to reveal a terrorist wearing a bullet proof vest, are you going to prefer (at THAT moment) to be armed or unarmed?
You won't know if the bad guy is wearing one or not so you have to go for a head shot. It doesn't have to be worn to get past security, 'nough said.
Reliance and or over confidence that the bad guy can be defeated with a single shot (because thats all you may get) is a mistake because rather than grappling with the guy in the cockpit you'll be doing a quick draw Mc Graw, most likely with a unsuccessful outcome unless you get him/her in the head.
I'm not against inflicting deadly force on the bad guys but their (must be) other strategies and devices that require less pilot currency, technical training and self control to reliably implement.
Mickjoebill
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Manchester
Age: 40
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm not against inflicting deadly force on the bad guys but their (must be) other strategies and devices that require less pilot currency, technical training and self control to reliably implement.
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: EGHP
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
MJB - 100% agree with your last piece.
But I cant believe that US pilots would be trained to go for a head shot on a moving target, even at close range. No way.
I'm not against inflicting deadly force on the bad guys but their (must be) other strategies and devices that require less pilot currency, technical training and self control to reliably implement.
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: US
Posts: 2,205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
AirScrew
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: EGHP
Posts: 17
MJB - 100% agree with your last piece.
Quote:
I'm not against inflicting deadly force on the bad guys but their (must be) other strategies and devices that require less pilot currency, technical training and self control to reliably implement.
But I cant believe that US pilots would be trained to go for a head shot on a moving target, even at close range. No way.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hopefully no one every details to you what is, or isn't, included in the training.
The nice thing about any self defense training at this level is that it's not on the 1000 yd, 500 yd, or 1000 inch ranges. Shoot, even practicing on a 100 inch range would be unrealistic. This isn't urban, or open terrain, combat with a sidearm. It's spitting distance, or closer, depending upon the aircraft cockpit.
P.S. CA Bud Flagg was EXTREMELY well liked at AA.
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: EGHP
Posts: 17
MJB - 100% agree with your last piece.
Quote:
I'm not against inflicting deadly force on the bad guys but their (must be) other strategies and devices that require less pilot currency, technical training and self control to reliably implement.
But I cant believe that US pilots would be trained to go for a head shot on a moving target, even at close range. No way.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hopefully no one every details to you what is, or isn't, included in the training.
The nice thing about any self defense training at this level is that it's not on the 1000 yd, 500 yd, or 1000 inch ranges. Shoot, even practicing on a 100 inch range would be unrealistic. This isn't urban, or open terrain, combat with a sidearm. It's spitting distance, or closer, depending upon the aircraft cockpit.
P.S. CA Bud Flagg was EXTREMELY well liked at AA.
I just couldn't help it I had to post (Specialy when people with no knowledge or intelligence at all go on an US bashing spree..). How about this, TSA misses gun (Human error or stupidity), or gun is introduced by accomplices working in the secure area of the airport or a "special" composite gun is assembled in the plane (after being carried by several different passengers). Hijacker (s) takes control of the passenger cabin and then shoots the lock to the cockpit to gain access. so for all the fools out there, maybe you should go and live in some hippie community with peace forever.... this is a very real and dangerous world. So the last line of defence is the crew inside the cockpit an the gun they carry give them a better chance. this is reality.
Last edited by Melax; 3rd Apr 2008 at 13:35.
I see a lot of problems with "shooting the locks out."
Have you ever tried shooting a lock? Are you sure this procedure works?
Sorry pro-gun guys, but some of the arguments here for armed pilots are really really reaching. I think it reflects poorly on the pro-gun crowd.
And please, no "cars kill people too". I don't think pilots want to park their cars in the cockpit either.
Have you ever tried shooting a lock? Are you sure this procedure works?
Sorry pro-gun guys, but some of the arguments here for armed pilots are really really reaching. I think it reflects poorly on the pro-gun crowd.
And please, no "cars kill people too". I don't think pilots want to park their cars in the cockpit either.
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: SW tip of Europe
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
(...)Hijacker (s) takes control of the passenger cabin and then shoots the lock to the cockpit to gain access(...)
Erm...no offence meant, Melax, but do you mean discharging a firearm in order to shoot the lock off...an armoured door???
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Bielefeld, Germany
Posts: 955
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Melax
I just couldn't help it I had to post (Specialy when people with no knowledge or intelligence at all go on an US bashing spree..). How about this
Originally Posted by Melax
for all the fools out there, maybe you should go and live in some hippie community with peace forever.... this is a very real and dangerous world.
Let me suggest that, when entering an international discussion, one try to comprehend and engage the arguments, rather than spit on them. It leaves a much better impression.
PBL
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Age: 66
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
TSA Forces Armed Pilots To Use Booby-Trap Holster
Check out the video on www.liveleak.com. Its titled TSA Forces Armed Pilots To Use Booby-Trap Holster. If you go to Media Map (new) and scroll down the right side to find TSA Forces Armed Pilots To Use Booby-Trap Holster.
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Age: 52
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"Like saying "sulphuric acid isn't dangerous - scientists with slippery hands are dangerous"
Love that quote...but of course only a fool would gie a beaker of sulfuric acid to a scientist who is know to have slippery hands.
The same can be said of humans - they are dangerous, some even psychotic - so why keep giving them obvious means with which to kill????
I certainly don't have a solution, but I have enjoyed the debate all the same.
Love that quote...but of course only a fool would gie a beaker of sulfuric acid to a scientist who is know to have slippery hands.
The same can be said of humans - they are dangerous, some even psychotic - so why keep giving them obvious means with which to kill????
I certainly don't have a solution, but I have enjoyed the debate all the same.
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: South
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Bullets & Guns & Cockpits?
"EISH"
This is the word one will get used to when you get any error in anything down here in South Africa.
So many opinions - but if I may add mine, for what it is worth, if any?
- It sounds as if our pilot friends in the US have something that was imposed on them. No matter what we argue it has to be dealt with in the most professional way they can.
- My appreciation of the situation: What ever they have to do with these .40 cal hand guns they have to do as safe as possible.
- Yes there are multiple very sensitive pieces of equipment etc... in the cockpit but from my little knowledge of the layout of a cockpit and the pictures we were shown in this thread that is now trying to become "a threat to national security"
it is clear that:
1. If the pilot was indeed handling the said fire arm for whatever reason he was supposed to according to reports we were given - he was pointing it in the direction of the part of the cockpit (from his assumed position in the aircraft) where it would affect no harm to any systems or equipment and definitely people in case of an accidental discharge. So what is the fuss? (Murphy: "If something can go wrong - it will". Me: "If something does go wrong - make sure the least amount of harm can result") Maybe the pilot listened to me???
- Before you want to crucify me - I am only stating and interpreting the facts as they were presented and I am not taking the responsibility for their factual correctness.
- I don't think I will appreciate being a Captain or First Officer at this time in the USA as I am not particular comfortable with guns in the cabin or cockpit - but I appreciate the differences in situations accross the world.
- I do however appreciate the facts and try to stay away from the emotions? (Very hard to not get emotional in Africa)
- But then again who cares about them if we can rant on and on about safe and unsafe guns?
- As for airport security and scrutiny of apron staff - maybe Europe is different but I understand the apprehension of pilots to accept that nothing can go through - although it is again just my opinion. There are too many examples of security missing small detail or not paying attention. There is no guarantee - no fail safe system anywhere in the world.
VG300
This is the word one will get used to when you get any error in anything down here in South Africa.
So many opinions - but if I may add mine, for what it is worth, if any?
- It sounds as if our pilot friends in the US have something that was imposed on them. No matter what we argue it has to be dealt with in the most professional way they can.
- My appreciation of the situation: What ever they have to do with these .40 cal hand guns they have to do as safe as possible.
- Yes there are multiple very sensitive pieces of equipment etc... in the cockpit but from my little knowledge of the layout of a cockpit and the pictures we were shown in this thread that is now trying to become "a threat to national security"
it is clear that:1. If the pilot was indeed handling the said fire arm for whatever reason he was supposed to according to reports we were given - he was pointing it in the direction of the part of the cockpit (from his assumed position in the aircraft) where it would affect no harm to any systems or equipment and definitely people in case of an accidental discharge. So what is the fuss? (Murphy: "If something can go wrong - it will". Me: "If something does go wrong - make sure the least amount of harm can result") Maybe the pilot listened to me???
- Before you want to crucify me - I am only stating and interpreting the facts as they were presented and I am not taking the responsibility for their factual correctness.
- I don't think I will appreciate being a Captain or First Officer at this time in the USA as I am not particular comfortable with guns in the cabin or cockpit - but I appreciate the differences in situations accross the world.
- I do however appreciate the facts and try to stay away from the emotions? (Very hard to not get emotional in Africa)
- But then again who cares about them if we can rant on and on about safe and unsafe guns?
- As for airport security and scrutiny of apron staff - maybe Europe is different but I understand the apprehension of pilots to accept that nothing can go through - although it is again just my opinion. There are too many examples of security missing small detail or not paying attention. There is no guarantee - no fail safe system anywhere in the world.
VG300
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: KSA
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Do our Euro friends realize that hundreds of armed passengers fly on U.S. airlines every day in the form of traveling Federal agents and assorted law enforcement personnel? They aren't directly connected in any way to protecting the aircraft (i.e. Sky Marshalls and FFDO's) their flying on?. Their weapon is a job-required tool they have to carry with them, even though most of them never have cause to use them in the performance of their duties, and qualifying with their weapons certainly doesn't involve tactics particular to an aircraft cabin.
The fear of armed pilots despite screening and training borders on the Irrational, no matter the atempt to drape that fear with a facade of rational debate. I'm convinced it's a cultural thing, and never the two opinions shall meet.
Euro pilots should certainly refrain from applying for airline jobs in the U.S., given that their fellow crewmember or some passengers in the cabin may be armed. I would think the fear would create in them a mental situation where they couldn't perform their duties.
The fear of armed pilots despite screening and training borders on the Irrational, no matter the atempt to drape that fear with a facade of rational debate. I'm convinced it's a cultural thing, and never the two opinions shall meet.
Euro pilots should certainly refrain from applying for airline jobs in the U.S., given that their fellow crewmember or some passengers in the cabin may be armed. I would think the fear would create in them a mental situation where they couldn't perform their duties.
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: a radar shadow
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
CNN is now reporting that the pilot involved is to be fired.
http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/04/17/pilot.gun/index.html
http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/04/17/pilot.gun/index.html