Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Alpa Changes Position To Age 65

Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Alpa Changes Position To Age 65

Old 24th May 2007, 18:06
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Unionville, PA, USA
Age: 76
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up Alpa Changes Position To Age 65

Release #07.029
May 24, 2007
ALPA Sets New Course on Age 60
WASHINGTON, D.C.—The Executive Board of the Air Line Pilots Association, International (ALPA) today voted by an overwhelming 80 percent margin to end the union’s longstanding support for the FAA Age 60 mandatory retirement age for airline pilots. In the face of concerted efforts to change the rule in Congress and the FAA, the ALPA Executive Board directed that union resources be committed to protecting pilot interests by exerting ALPA's influence in any rule change.
“The Executive Board spoke clearly this afternoon,” said ALPA's president, Capt. John Prater. “ALPA pilots will be fully engaged in shaping any rule change. Any legislative or regulatory change needs to address ALPA’s priorities in the areas of safety, medical standards, benefit issues, no retroactive application of change, liability protection, and appropriate rule implementation.”
ALPA will now turn its attention to working to advocate the following priorities contained in the resolution:
Appropriate legislative language to prevent retroactive application of a change to the Age 60 Rule, to the effect that: “No person over 60, except active flight deck crewmembers, on the effective date may serve as a pilot (captain or first officer) for a Part 121 airline unless such person is newly hired as a pilot on or after such effective date without credit for prior seniority or prior longevity for benefits or other terms related to length of service prior to the date of rehire under any labor agreement or employment policies of the air carrier.”
Appropriate legislative language to ensure stronger liability protection for airlines and pilot unions in implementing a change to the rule, to the effect that: “Any action in conformance with this Act or with a regulation under this Act may not serve as a basis for liability or relief before any court or agency of the United States, or of any state or locality, nor may any action taken prior to the effective date of enactment on the basis of section 121.383(c) of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations as then in effect.”
Ensuring that, under a defined benefit retirement plan, a change to the Age 60 Rule will not reduce a participant’s or beneficiary’s accrued benefit nor reduce a benefit to which a participant or beneficiary would have been entitled without enactment of such a change to the Rule.
Opposing any additional age-related diagnostic medical testing.
Opposing any attempt by the FAA to obtain greater access to pilot medical records.
Supporting FAA Air Surgeon Tilton’s recommendation to require a 1st Class Medical certification every six months for pilots over age 60.
Opposing for domestic operation the implementation of the ICAO standard that at least one pilot in the cockpit be under age 60. Once sufficient data on pilots over age 60 becomes available, unless the necessity for this mitigation for the long term is clearly shown, advocate for removal of the ICAO over/under mitigation for all operations.
Support the ability of a pilot to retire prior to the mandatory age without penalty.
The Board charged that ALPA continue to aggressively lobby for the adoption of the Akaka bill (which would provide full PBGC benefits to pilots who retire at age 60).
The Road to Action
The ground began shifting on the Age 60 rule when FAA Administrator Marion Blakey announced in January 2007 that “the FAA will propose a new rule to allow pilots to fly until they are 65”, and that “(t)he rule we intend to propose will parallel the ICAO standard – either pilot or copilot may fly up to age 65 as long as the other crewmember is under 60.”
In response to the FAA Administrator’s announcement, Prater established the ALPA Age 60 Blue Ribbon Panel “to study the long-range effects of potential changes to the FAA Age 60 Rule and to identify issues connected to possible changes to pilot mandatory retirement age.”
The Panel presented its findings in the areas of aviation safety; collective bargaining; the cost and structure of heath care, disability, and retirement benefits; pilot training; medical standards; and scheduling rules to the Executive Council at its April 2007 meeting.
Concurrent to this internal ALPA work, legislative efforts in Congress to change the pilot mandatory retirement age accelerated, including the introduction of S.65 and H.R.1125 – “The Freedom to Fly Act.” The Panel concluded that the provisions in these bills do not sufficiently address ALPA’s issues with respect to a change in the mandatory retirement age.
In response to this conclusion, the Council recommended to the Executive Board that ALPA modify its policy to enable ALPA to influence legislation and regulatory efforts. This became more critical as legislative efforts to change the rule accelerated.
In its deliberations, the Board took into account the high likelihood of rule change through either the legislative or the regulatory process, as well as survey data from ALPA members overwhelmingly affirming that if the rule is going to change, ALPA needs to influence that change. ALPA will now develop a comprehensive legislative plan to do just that.
Founded in 1931, ALPA represents 60,000 pilots at 40 airlines in the U.S. and Canada. Visit the ALPA website at http://www.alpa.org.
# # #
ALPA CONTACTS: Pete Janhunen, Linda Shotwell, Molly Martin, 703-481-4440
FoxHunter is offline  
Old 31st May 2007, 15:19
  #2 (permalink)  
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Citizen of the World
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How very interesting. The same old sh*t from ALPA - trying to get seniority issues built into legislation. The law is one thing and your company seniority/retirement/promotion rules are entirely different. Most of all, however, it's good news for those US pilots who have always wanted to have the OPTION of continuing to fly beyond 60. If you are one of those who needs or wishes to do so then fine. If you're fortunate enough to not NEED to do so then nobody's forcing you to. Now for the next step - fly as long as you can pass your checks - medical and proficiency - without ridiculous ageist regulations that do not stand up to serious analysis.
SIDSTAR is offline  
Old 1st Jun 2007, 01:26
  #3 (permalink)  
Nemo Me Impune Lacessit
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Derbyshire, England.
Posts: 4,089
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Interesting to see how the ALPA position has done a complete one eighty since a few pension funds got raided!

Good news, never the less.
parabellum is online now  
Old 1st Jun 2007, 03:59
  #4 (permalink)  
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 2,084
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Age 65

Nice that the 'leaders' of ALPAS decide to endorse age 65 before they even acknowledge let alone publish the results of a membership poll on said issue.

Not quite sure what thay represent me for...
stilton is offline  
Old 1st Jun 2007, 06:55
  #5 (permalink)  
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Down south, USA.
Posts: 1,594
Received 9 Likes on 1 Post
As for (airline etc) pensions and the normal US "frontier-mentality" that allows them to be grossly underfunded or "borrowed from", I'm still wondering how the USAirways pilots signed their T.A. a few years ago and afterwards discovered that their pensions were not included.

Who overlooked this, or was it typically complex language which was not analyzed much by the USAirways pilots' attorneys, or did pilots also "wear the attorney hat"?

What a nightmare. It is astounding that their former CFO has survived this long (top-notch 'kosher' bodyguards as with old Frank in Houston?).
Ignition Override is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.