Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Thrust Reverser falls off 747 in Frankfurt

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Thrust Reverser falls off 747 in Frankfurt

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 27th May 2007, 01:13
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
James T73J - Brakes/RT

Hi James

If you can get hold of a AOM (you can find a copy on the net for 737-800) the manual goes in some detail as to why aircraft use reverse thrust.

You are right in that the use of the reverse thrust helps reduce the huge load on the brakes, as you can imagine brakes on a 747/767/757 or A340 are very costly to replace. Greatest load is present at highest rate of knots, so deploying reverse thrust once you have main gear touch.

The level of brake modulation is calculated and the force required to slow aircraft down at a set rate is dependant on whether reverse thrust/spoiler deployment has taken place, so if no reverse thrust or idle reverse thrust is used then the force required by the brakes is that much greater.

Anyone remember what happen with that Qantas flight that overran on a wet runway landing BangKok?? no/idle reverse thrust or autobrake set to 1 or 2 rather than 3 or Max?
b737800capt06 is offline  
Old 27th May 2007, 04:03
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: n.s.w
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Looks like more T/R inspections coming up, a few years ago QANTAS lost a cold stream nozzle out of Cairns. This caused a lot of problems for us but we haven't lost one since.
company_spy is offline  
Old 27th May 2007, 05:22
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Switzerland, Singapore
Posts: 1,309
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, mon ami, I have ended up on a slippery runway (31R at JFK) in a DC-10 with the cockpit over the grass but the wheels, luckily, still on the concrete.
Well, my friend, if you hadn't used reverse, it's quite sure where you would have ended...
Dani is offline  
Old 27th May 2007, 06:48
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Anyone remember what happen with that Qantas flight that overran on a wet runway landing BangKok?? no/idle reverse thrust or autobrake set to 1 or 2 rather than 3 or Max?
Landing was the 'normal' QF config

flaps 25 no reversers

Autobrakes were orignally set to '2', the captain later adjusted them to '3' after ATC informed them the runway was wet

you can read the full ATSB report here
http://www.atsb.gov.au/publications/...904538_001.pdf
dkaarma is offline  
Old 27th May 2007, 07:13
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: London
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Didn't a Russkie jet get a bad press some years ago for self-reversing off a stand at LHR during a lollypop-wavers strike?
delta96 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.